Mobile Streams Share Discussion Threads

[apex345] 07/5/2024 12:14

Lots of sell trades based on no news,or is it just that the business is trading on the aim market.

[jdave1] 02/5/2024 17:21

The wider PI do not rate the RNS going on the price. As always smoke and mirrors language 'Pre money' value LMAO. Snake oil talk

[petercuntin] 30/4/2024 20:47

Mental
"$5m pre money value is what MOS want it to be"
How much have Moos raised pour bet Purchase

[stuie62] 27/4/2024 07:48

Barry on LSE asking why MOS would need to raise cash again.Simple really, Epstein tried and failed to raise 2 million quid last November to fund the new venture and working capital through 2024.How much have they managed to raise? A big shortfall means more cash needed or they go under.

[apex345] 24/4/2024 12:34

Share value Down the aim Drain

[barnes4] 22/4/2024 18:55

How is this even still going?

[stuie62] 22/4/2024 18:20

Over 1% of the Company dumped at an all time low tells you all you need to know.That's 50% below the insiders placing price :))))Not long now before another attempted raise to keep the lights on or going bust before year end.

[jdave1] 22/4/2024 14:30

Estadio will be a huge drain of cash as it is a start up.

Perhaps it may double the Bitso or EFC NFT's into double figures!

I have noted that 1 individual wallet has recently bought both the Pumas and Atlante new drops. So we have a fan of both Pumas and Atlante at the same time LOL. In other words some underwater PI has bought a chunk of 1 dollar Atlante NFT's, then a few of the Pumas ones at 24 dollars to try and pump a bit of life into the DEAD NFT drops.

All of the last four drops add up to about 1500 US of sales, without any overheads(Bitso experiences, EFC Icons, Atlante and Pumas)!

Bedroom business

[roleybirkin] 22/4/2024 11:16

Post this morning by Mobile Streams Plc



Seems that progress at Estadio is taking place and fast...

[purchaseatthetop] 16/4/2024 16:45

The amazing thing is that it has any market capital at all!

[stuie62] 16/4/2024 16:38

The end of this week is 1 month since their latest cash call.How much did they raise and what's the monthly cash burn?Don't forget they are woefully short of the amount Epstein attempted to raise in November. There's a reason why Barry has gone into full ramp mode, the Company is skint and desperate for cash.

[apex345] 16/4/2024 09:06

More businesses moving away from the aim market ,mobilestreams should do the same ..

[apex345] 16/4/2024 09:01

Down the aim Drain.

[amtech1] 15/4/2024 07:56

And yet city still posts over there even after he was caught pretending to be someone from the states, against LSE rules, against market rules. You've got to wonder how he got away with that.

[roleybirkin] 12/4/2024 12:45

Short and snappy article put out by WA. Technology today...

[stuie62] 11/4/2024 22:02

I see Barry is accusing me of stock bashing on LSE.My ban there was allegedly for misinformation. Let's see if he has the minerals to raise his head here and call me out for stating Epstein attempted to get away a huge Placing in November last year?As things have transpired since my ban, it seems I've been correct regarding the dire state of this Company as seen by the lack of revenue and the pathetic Placings since.And they are still hundreds of thousands of pounds short of working capital.

[terminator101] 11/4/2024 07:58

That's one way to get your money back. Join the aim directors gravy train and suck the cash out of the gerbils.

[stuie62] 11/4/2024 07:18

Barker being ramped as a sound appointment.Not sure why to be honest?He's managed to call this very very wrong, despite having the ear of Epstein. He Tr1d at over 0.1p off the back of the Bitso deal :)))Perhaps Epstein considered his credentials of baseless ramping on LSE and Hive as worthy of a place on the BOD?Or maybe its his ability to be first to 'like' every HeroesNFTClub Tweet? ;)

[purchaseatthetop] 11/4/2024 06:50

Details of the Agreement

Under the terms of the Agreement, the parties have agreed a target revenue figure over the 5 years of the contract, of which MOS's share is approximately USD 3.7 million. This net figure is the estimated revenue MOS will receive after any rev-share payments have been made. The Agreement also requires MOS to make a small initial cash payment to Atlante and if certain revenue targets in a year are met then a minimum revenue guarantee would exist for the next year.. However, in the context of the revenue that MOS would receive for this to be activated, the Board considers these would be modest and achievable from within the next year's revenue that MOS expects to receive from the contract. The Board further believes that, noting the expected recurring nature of NFT revenues, it estimates that its maximum net exposure, under all but the most extreme worst case commercial assumptions, including the upfront cash fee, would be approximately USD 50,000 over the first 3 years of the Agreement. The Agreement contains a 3 year break clause and standard terms for termination.

Have we achieved the “most extreme worst case” yet?