Mediclinic Share Discussion Threads

[sprydon] 09/7/2013 12:54

I agree John, there are a number joining. It was just a casual observation. Nevik, most importantly is there any indication of when the suspension is going to be lifted? are they just waiting so to announce a wealth of positive news on relisting?

[johnspain] 09/7/2013 11:57

nevik,
read your previous posts and think I see what you are getting at.
feeling a little better,thanks

[johnspain] 09/7/2013 11:51

nevik - thanks for the 'clarification' :)

at least you can't be accused of ramping a suspended stock :)

cheers, John

[nevik2] 09/7/2013 11:48

Thats the point I don't know how as it was private and confidential, plus I'm confused as to why I was told.
All I can say is I've hinted at it in recent posts.
I've asked what state is Intabet in as a product.
I was given a positive answer, later after an exchange of emails and a question regarding "is that happening?". I was given names as to whom it's happening with right now.
Not sure that makes any sense. Not that anything I say or do will effect the share price today.
I also have to hold my hands up and say I don't know exactly what it means, on the face of it all sound very encouraging.
I'm expecting/hoping for an announcement to clarify, while trying not to get carried away on a river of hopes and wishes heading for disappointment lake.

[johnspain] 09/7/2013 11:21

nevik, could do with some good news, how about sharing?

thanks, John

[nevik2] 09/7/2013 11:19

I had an email from PJ a few days ago, either he is having a laugh at my expense or things actually could be pretty good sooner rather than later.
I have no reason to suspect that he is anything other than a good bloke, I do just wonder why he told me the things he did. I almost wonder if he wanted a controlled leak of information.
Straight answers to straight questions regarding Intabet, something I have not always had before.

[johnspain] 09/7/2013 11:10

sprydon - for balance there was an article in the standard about 3 companies listing on AIM yesterday.

[sprydon] 09/7/2013 11:04

Makes you wonder eh?

Don't know if we are in suspension or delist territory? One of the same? either ain't great...

[nevik2] 09/7/2013 10:47

Ok got it after clicking the link again after registration.

[nevik2] 09/7/2013 09:50

Sprydon
I tried the link, signed my soul away for no doubt more junk mail but I can not find the AIM article.

[sprydon] 09/7/2013 08:32

Interesting article about the number of companies that have delisted from aim market.

[nevik2] 05/7/2013 15:46

Just because you have the best odds does not mean you will win, or the bookie will lose.
You don't know if they have a working product or not, neither do I. There is a very good chance they do have a working product.
The marketing would be done by whoever is offering it as a service, only if it is a standalone product would MDC have to market it to the public.
Did they not say it was not going to be a standalone earlier? Phil can do the marketing to potential clients by knocking on doors, not TV adds.
If right now that product is being shoehorned into another bookies/casino site then the short term problems are a long way to being solved.
Fact is we don't know, we are not anymore or less aware of what is happening than we were before delisting.
There is as much reason to think it's happening as it is not, very little knowledge either way to do anything other than guess.

[adh0] 05/7/2013 13:34

You are deluded. I admire you optimism but you are not being realistic. Short term, they have no working product, medium term they will lose money as they have to market the product if it exists and revenues if they come will take time no product makes £s the second it begins. Long term the business model is flawed and even if it wasn't Purple Lounge and HMRC liabilities will kill MDC.

TWL may win long term. I do stress "MAY" as I seriously doubt it if you give people only the best odds then they wont lose and therefore the bookmaker (or Intabet if the broker) wont win. Regardless they have the short and medium term problems to contend with.

[nevik2] 05/7/2013 11:44

I believe it was being marketed as an add on for other companies and less a stand alone product. So no doubt if it is being taken up by others it will be those others that launch it and no doubt they will want it to be for the start of the season.
Who knows. I just wonder if getting back on the list, deals with others in final stages are aiming for a week or two before the season starts. It would make sense if you were in a position to make that happen to do it. And what a winner you think that should be for us all. It's all if's and might be, there is a chance all the same. What a good start to the season that would be, add in a win for the Canaries......perfik.

[bw123] 05/7/2013 10:49

Surely they are looking at a launch ready for the new foorball season next month? (or at least you would hope so!).

[nevik2] 05/7/2013 10:44

Lets for a minute think about this from a positive view.
Suspension is doing no harm to the share price.
Suppose Intabet was finished as per the date given, suppose it has one or two takers. They would need to integrate Intabet into their existing system, check it run it check it some more, problems always occur. It all takes time to do properly. It could easily still be way on track but not in a position to announce a done deal.
Just suppose it gets listed with a major deal attached? I wonder where it would go to?
Just suppose or lets pretend, what would it be worth? share price of 1p, more? Dilution would be the killer in the long run, but a spike of enthusiasm could briefly overlook that.

[adh0] 04/7/2013 14:00

Maybe, I dont know. I dont see what was in the posts which made them have to be removed. I have seen other very very good posts go "missing" before. It is a worry.

[nevik2] 04/7/2013 13:59

No I reckon it's ADVFN not wanting to fall foul of the law.
Posting saying I know more than you, then slander a company or individual with made up stuff is not a good idea.
We can speculate, offer an opinion on how we think it will play out. But to start stating derogatory remarks as fact, is going to far without unless it's backed up with proof.
I would guess PJ has had a word or MDC solicitors have had a word.

I also have a sneaky feeling good news might not be to far away and no I can't back that up with proof, it's speculation on my part.

[jaka] 04/7/2013 13:44

Was it a trick of the Drummond's? Could it of been on of its advisors? Just a thought.

[adh0] 04/7/2013 13:27

Posts are going missing, which is never a good sign. Even if untrue then they should be left so people can discredit them and show they are untrue. Removing negative posts was a trick of the Drummonds it is disappointing that it has continued.

[nevik2] 04/7/2013 12:39

samk4 still not going with it. It's only PJ? fine by me, as it stands not much more would be needed full-time. My business is only me as well and that's worked well for a number of years.
If MDC comeback with a product and deals will you be pleased or disappointed?

[adh0] 04/7/2013 11:37

Time for an EGM?

[nevik2] 04/7/2013 09:07

samk4, sorry but you heard? come on what inside line do you have? none I bet, no more than your "bailiffs have been in" remark from earlier.
I doubt you have any part of this company in your portfolio, more like you had some dosh in Purple Lounge and now have an axe to grind.
You have no more of an idea what state Intabet is in than any of us do here.
The situation is unclear and bad enough without people making up stories.