ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

LION Lionsgold

2.65
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lionsgold LSE:LION London Ordinary Share GG00B3M9KL68 ORD NPV
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 2.65 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Lionsgold Share Discussion Threads

Showing 13201 to 13211 of 14025 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  537  536  535  534  533  532  531  530  529  528  527  526  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/1/2020
03:52
DJWALL on LSE is normally quick to rush to defend theparryrat.

This poster is now very conspicuous through his silence over theparryrats family's propensity for crookedness........or will he suddenly appear when he frees his arm which is usually stuck way up theparryrat's backside .............again and again!

1rodson
10/1/2020
10:08
Ahh but I am doing it ask Cocoran and Hazel.........let you know about old muscle bound on steroids ........he will do anything to protect his reputation.

That said look at all the claims he has made in support of Parry LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO if he falls down on these he will be finished in the financial world and with all the financing he has.........if they pull it he will be bankrupt and that's a fact.

Also but I am only assuming this so you can disregard it. His precarious financial,position could be the reason he threw in with a RAT in the first place................the thought of a quick Buck can influence many.

If parry and his gang have chosen to cheat ......I have chosen to right the wrongs using every possible legal trick in the book.........just like Cocoran tried to do but failed lololololololololo I never fail ask those who I was working with in the third world and others that know me!

1rodson
10/1/2020
07:04
Stop whining you clunge, you're not going to do anything or achieve anything..... You're boring.
copthis1
10/1/2020
07:00
Good work Rodders
1rickyb
10/1/2020
04:01
One thing needs to be said also and that is ..........that I most definitely point my contricional finger of guilt firmly and directly at Andrew of Proactive Investors for giving theparryrat so much exposure without first checking upon his antecedents!
1rodson
10/1/2020
02:24
My vision is fixed on theparryrat whose character revolves in his chimerian world of deception to which one has to descend to remain on top of thus making it difficult to improve when deprived of the light of right!
1rodson
09/1/2020
23:51
Still at it I see rodson...
I see that 2020 hasn't improved your vision at all.. hey ho.

pesto1
09/1/2020
21:04
LOOK WHAT PARRY KNOWINGLY FALSELY STATED

A SEAT AT THE TABLE OF WORLD BANKING

2018 IS GOING TO BE A HUGE YEAT FOR US!

[...] .proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/308465/-2018-is-going-to-be-huge-for-us-says-lionsgold-ceo-cameron-parry-8465.html

WE WILL RELIST IN Q1 2019 SAID BOTH PARRY AND COCORAN.....and they spewed many more deliberate lies with the purposeful intention to deceive ........and that is criminal

which seem to run in the parryrat FAMILY

.................................................................




THEN LOOK AT THE LAW AND SUE THE CHEATING CROOK. It's obvious now that all he wants is your money....so take his while you can.



Civil/commercial fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation and the tort of deceit

Ask yourself what is fraudulent misrepresentation? If you don't know its all here for you....be my guest!

Civil or commercial fraud commonly means a fraudulent misrepresentation, which can lead to a claim under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 or the common law tort of deceit.

Fraudulent misrepresentation is where a false statement is dishonestly made to a person upon which that person relies and, as a consequence of relying on that statement, suffers some damage.

Tort of deceit
The tort of deceit provides a civil remedy for an individual who has relied on a false representation to their detriment and requires the following elements to be proven:

an individual has made a representation to another party which is false;
the individual knows it to be false or was reckless as to the truth of the statement;
there is an intention to deceive and it is acted upon;
loss is suffered as a consequence.
Example of deceit
An example of when the tort of deceit will come into play is where an individual has made a false insurance claim to their insurer in the case of a motoring accident. If, for example, they claim that another party has damaged their vehicle in a collision, but it in fact was their own fault and the original statement has caused the insurance company to pay out, then that individual would be liable to the insurance company under the tort of deceit.

Elements of the claim
False representation
There must be a statement (written or oral) or conduct amounting to a representation which is false. A statement would obviously involve something being said or written, whereas conduct consisting of wearing a uniform or dress of some kind would be included.

Mere silence would not be considered a false representation.

Of a fact
The misrepresentation must be in relation to a specific fact, ie, the facts of the motoring case. Statements of opinion or intention therefore do not fall within the definition of a false misrepresentation.

Knowing or reckless as to whether the statement is false
For the tort of deceit to be actionable it is not enough that the defendant was negligent as to whether the statement was false (that there was a lack of reasonable grounds to believe the statement was true). The defendant has to know the statement was untrue or be reckless as to the truthfulness. Anything less than this is not enough.

This is a subjective test as it is relating to the defendant’s actual knowledge and state of mind.

There was reliance upon the representation
The representation does not need to have been the sole reason for the subsequent actions leading to loss – it need only to have been material in that it was one of the factors which together led to the course of action.

1rodson
08/1/2020
22:16
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO TALKING ABOUT THE PARRYRAT AGAIN ARE WE? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
1rodson
08/1/2020
20:08
MORE RUBBISHY NONSENSE AND FILTH ON LSE...HARDLY THE WAY TO ATTRACT CROWDFUNDING.
1rodson
08/1/2020
20:02
prove me wrong and I may do just that meanwhile just STFU

THE ONLY STUPID CVNTS HERE ARE THE SHAREHOLDERS FOR PUTTING UP WITH THE PARRYPIG.

1rodson
Chat Pages: Latest  537  536  535  534  533  532  531  530  529  528  527  526  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock