We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kibo Energy Plc | LSE:KIBO | London | Ordinary Share | IE00B97C0C31 | ORD EUR0.0001 (CDI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0375 | 0.035 | 0.04 | 0.0375 | 0.0375 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 08:00:09 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 1.04M | -9.78M | -0.0026 | -0.15 | 1.51M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/11/2021 16:19 | FCA regulated I hope! | sirianbotham | |
19/11/2021 15:39 | "... I'm an independent analyst who looks at possibilities and analyses them as information for investors. I did that successfully for many institutions covering over 70 miners up ...." Do you mind sharing your real name? I presume it is not the one you used when you emailed me threatening legal actions?!? I think we all the answer but would be good to see if you are honest enough to do so! lurker5 19 Nov '21 - 14:42 - 6515 of 6515 Dear oh Dear ! I see Yasx continues to miss the point re this thread and NCCL. He's obviously incapable of understanding the calculations I put forward in starting this Kibo thread to show it never would be viable at the share price it then had, and because I recognised - and explained - the idiocy of those and their 'arguments' who were ramping it on LC's behalf. The little chap can't understand them. AS for NCCL I'm not a share 'tipster' and never have been. I'm an independent analyst who looks at possibilities and analyses them as information for investors. I did that successfully for many institutions covering over 70 miners up to 2008 when the market for independent, objective, analysis collapsed (due then FCA's predecessor's misconceived regulations preventing funds paying for research.) Those institutions wanted thoroughly researched information, and not 'tips'. My NCCL calculations still stand in case it goes ahead. I have no idea whether it will, just as Yasx hasn't, but claims he is clever than those who are more honest. The little chap has no other way to keep his own ego afloat than by denigrating anyone or any company he can find, without the intelligence to spot the basis or premise on which any research or opinions they might have produced. In all the posts he's made on other companies, he's never shown the slightest knowledge of how companies actually work (a bit like that other blusterer beginning with 'Y'. Hmm) So any intelligent or experienced reader of his posts will conclude that he has no professional qualifications or experience, but only a lot of time on his little hands. | yaki | |
19/11/2021 14:42 | Dear oh Dear ! I see Yasx continues to miss the point re this thread and NCCL. He's obviously incapable of understanding the calculations I put forward in starting this Kibo thread to show it never would be viable at the share price it then had, and because I recognised - and explained - the idiocy of those and their 'arguments' who were ramping it on LC's behalf. The little chap can't understand them. AS for NCCL I'm not a share 'tipster' and never have been. I'm an independent analyst who looks at possibilities and analyses them as information for investors. I did that successfully for many institutions covering over 70 miners up to 2008 when the market for independent, objective, analysis collapsed (due then FCA's predecessor's misconceived regulations preventing funds paying for research.) Those institutions wanted thoroughly researched information, and not 'tips'. My NCCL calculations still stand in case it goes ahead. I have no idea whether it will, just as Yasx hasn't, but claims he is clever than those who are more honest. The little chap has no other way to keep his own ego afloat than by denigrating anyone or any company he can find, without the intelligence to spot the basis or premise on which any research or opinions they might have produced. In all the posts he's made on other companies, he's never shown the slightest knowledge of how companies actually work (a bit like that other blusterer beginning with 'Y'. Hmm) So any intelligent or experienced reader of his posts will conclude that he has no professional qualifications or experience, but only a lot of time on his little hands. | lurker5 | |
19/11/2021 14:13 | more questions in TZ hxxps://www.thecitiz Only if they had a Coal powered plant up and running ... | yaki | |
19/11/2021 11:37 | Johncasey - prolific ADVFN ramp account. Secret squirrel backs their unsubstantiated cut and paste post. Sigh. | frankandbeans | |
19/11/2021 11:33 | Based on my research, I won't be surprised if is the case. UK- TZ investor forum this week, Aus coal player, IntraE suspended itself as share price was motoring up and working on sell of its coal assets in TZ, etc etc JohnCasey 19 Nov '21 - 10:52 - 6508 of 6509 rumour of massive news...savvy buyers getting in now | yaki | |
19/11/2021 11:31 | Good for you. Now what’s any of this got to do with KIBO paid member of ADVFN or otherwise? | frankandbeans | |
19/11/2021 11:18 | Best comment on this board for ages'Personally I would like to see these boards move to validated status of both paying and none paying members.'Same for all social media platforms. They are a scourge on society. | sirianbotham | |
19/11/2021 10:52 | rumour of massive news...savvy buyers getting in now | johncasey | |
19/11/2021 10:04 | 7.5m buys, in 3 trades, within few mins of each other Mmmm | yaki | |
19/11/2021 09:56 | Good question, why don’t you look at past Q&A sessions and you should find your answer to that. | frankandbeans | |
19/11/2021 09:37 | “Its one of the questions I have for Louis“ Good luck with that. Q&A or AGM? And Yaki it doesn’t really matter who vetoed it, the intention of the board was to do a further consolidation. I wonder why. Tricky one that. | frankandbeans | |
19/11/2021 09:07 | "...but that was vetoed " and who by? Not by you, me old beans but some of the big retail holders Frankandbeans 19 Nov '21 - 07:48 - 6496 of 6497 They would have done another consolidation last year ( I think? ) but that was vetoed though imagine had it gone through what the shares in issue would be now? They aren’t shy to do the odd placing at whatever price they can get one away at, with all that extra headroom to issue significantly more… | yaki | |
19/11/2021 07:48 | They would have done another consolidation last year ( I think? ) but that was vetoed though imagine had it gone through what the shares in issue would be now? They aren’t shy to do the odd placing at whatever price they can get one away at, with all that extra headroom to issue significantly more… | frankandbeans | |
19/11/2021 06:29 | I notice the entire BOD hold less than 2% of the company, a fair proportion of those shares were issued in lieu of bonuses and salary from time to time, a wretched state of affairs, that tells you all you need to know. Given Coetzee's abject and ongoing failures it is truly amazing he has not been booted out. 55m shares on IPO in 2010, now nearly 3 billion but the real number is 4.2 billion after a 1 for 15 consolidation in 2012. Woeful. | grimreaper2019 | |
18/11/2021 22:37 | YasX Pleased to see you can still afford cakes. | uknighted | |
18/11/2021 22:22 | UK, Reciprocated. As for the dancing, regrettably struggle with that these days! But, do still have plenty of tea and several slices of cake. All the best. | yasx |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions