Investika Di Share Discussion Threads

[red river 1] 16/10/2007 13:02

The RAB holding is interesting as they disposed of their TMC holding some weeks ago. Seems they still have faith in the project then.

[strow] 16/10/2007 12:03

Thanks stemis

[stemis] 16/10/2007 11:38

strow, I've also updated header for your points on Belitung Zinc. Sorry it took me a while.

[pec2004] 16/10/2007 10:10

RAB will have a good idea of where this is going over the next couple of years.

[stemis] 16/10/2007 10:06

RAB look to have upped their stake by over 50%. I've updated the header.

[buetowa] 11/10/2007 16:40

Markets up!
Nickel up 47.6 cents to over $14 again; 3.4% !
TMC up 12.5 pence; 5.2% !
and
IVK down 1 pence !

Quiet board, so I thought I'd try and wake it up...

[rogerbridge] 03/10/2007 09:48

Put some more in my ISA with Hargreaves Lansdown last week

[strow] 03/10/2007 09:47

Yep-mine with them-stemis,did you read my posts re belitung??

[stemis] 03/10/2007 09:45

Eligble with Selftrade

[strow] 03/10/2007 09:43

Or barclays i assume,but then we all know about them

[david77] 03/10/2007 09:39

"eligible for ISA" - not with Fastrade

[tiggy2101] 03/10/2007 09:02

Thats a good point pec2004, I purchased a few IVK shares some weeks ago at around £1.80, I also purchased more TMC shares at £2.19 (my core holding has, and still is with TMC). IVK have certainly lagged well behind in price, and moves on very little volume.

[stemis] 02/10/2007 14:44

IVK dual listed in Australia and on AIM and therefore eligible for ISA = no CGT.

[david77] 02/10/2007 14:14

IVK listed in Australia and subject to full CGT. TMC listed on AIM and benefits from business assets tax relief - 50% CGT after a year and 25% CGT after two.

I had a gain of £1/2 million at one time on TMC but had only held shares a short time. All disappeared but I expect it will come back in time and then subject to low CGT.

[mpclag] 02/10/2007 12:07

stop moaning and start buying while you can

[pec2004] 02/10/2007 10:08

TMC up 10 and the mm's are lagging behind with IVK.

[strow] 28/9/2007 11:51

madmix-ridiculous it is then,but they didnt always do it-i think at some point they cottoned onto the cross holdings-anyways-happy to see it going up again

[madmix] 28/9/2007 08:50

Strow,

Its just so pants that the mms always line this with tmc,whether people are buying/selling here or not-it should not be allowed imo-they just dont want anyone to have a cheap way into tmc it seems,but cant see how they can be allowed to move it in line

Sorry, but that's ridiculous.

If there was an agreed takeover offer for IVK at £5 a share, would you not expect them to mark the shares up accordingly?

Equally, they will always react to good/bad news by moving the price initially.

The market makers often have long/short positions in the shares like the rest of us, and are simply pricing at what they see as a 'fair' level.

[badgerbadgerbadger] 28/9/2007 08:47

MM - I've done the same for pretty much the same reason, although the last time tmc was 280 on the way up the gap was about the same. The higher the prices the bigger the gap (simplistically). However, it seemed that CK has been a regular buyer of IVK rather than TMC and IVK also has other projects that could release good news.

[madmix] 28/9/2007 08:42

Interesting to compare the charts of TMC and IVK.

When TMC last traded at 280p, IVK was around the 240p level (vs the current 210p). Accordingly I've been buying IVK.

[strow] 28/9/2007 08:39

Its just so pants that the mms always line this with tmc,whether people are buying/selling here or not-it should not be allowed imo-they just dont want anyone to have a cheap way into tmc it seems,but cant see how they can be allowed to move it in line

[strow] 28/9/2007 08:17

yep :-)its good imo

[dunajcan] 27/9/2007 09:42

Does anybody know what do TMC reports mean for IVK? Is that good or not?