ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

INTQ Internetq

180.875
0.00 (0.00%)
17 Mar 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Internetq LSE:INTQ London Ordinary Share GB00B5BJJR09 ORD 0.25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 180.875 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Internetq Share Discussion Threads

Showing 2826 to 2848 of 3450 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  114  113  112  111  110  109  108  107  106  105  104  103  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
07/12/2015
09:27
Boff ... I take it you read the rebuttal , suggest you read it 2 more times with a neutral lens of analysis. Interestingly it's difficult to open new short positions via spread bets
ramas
07/12/2015
09:23
The markets should really pay more attention to a company director (even if guilty of the cardinal sin of being Greek) than some nasty little short selling maggot who's already been in trouble with the FCA (And is probably about to be in a lot more)
boffster
07/12/2015
09:19
A reasonably convincing rebuttal IMO .
They could have made it far more convincing for me if they had commented on their cash position-the third time they have passed on the opportunity to do so which makes me feel the worst.

cerrito
07/12/2015
09:09
no thanks, something dodgy about those pizzas
mister md
07/12/2015
09:06
Roast pig and stuffed pork pizza on the menu tonight, all for 1 drachma
onjohn
07/12/2015
09:03
now if the directors would buy in size we might actually believe the RNS ...
mister md
07/12/2015
08:49
added a few at 72p
Reminds me a bit of the situation at PLUS earlier this year

mister md
07/12/2015
08:43
Boffster - yes, enjoying a cautious punt on this too. Not on a long term hold though!
mister md
07/12/2015
08:38
I like it Mister MD! ;)
boffster
07/12/2015
08:37
yes, either that or more allegations to come so that shorters can exit their positions under 100p
mister md
07/12/2015
08:34
Statement released so the CEO can offload his stock to mugs. Globo part 2.
breaktwister
07/12/2015
08:30
So they say they have 160 b2b clients but their 2014 report says that 80% of revenues are derived from only 3 clients?
breaktwister
07/12/2015
08:13
Pig n pork shorters getting well burnt this morning...
joemillion
07/12/2015
08:10
I haven't read the full response.I did read the note on DSO. This is complete nonsense. You lower the DSO by getting a credit control team together to collect the cash due. Not by acquiring businesses that already have lower DSO's I mean W.T.F
ch4p_85
07/12/2015
08:07
One in the eye for Winnifroth and his dirty little short-selling chums. Give it up Tom!!
boffster
07/12/2015
08:07
In my opinion their response does not adequately explain their intangible assets position.

In the beginning they explain that only €0.7m of their payroll was capitalised as intangible assets and that they therefor are not reducing their operating costs by capitalizing a significant amount of payroll as development costs. So far so good.

But further down in their response they state that "Any technology company that is focused on cost containment and fast lead times
for developing software platforms is likely to use, in part, expert external
developers for some of the software development work"

I had a look in their annual report for 2014. For 2014 they purchased software worth ca. €18m euro.

This means that they are not only using external developers "in part", but external developers are supposedly responsible for 96% of the software development for this company. Even accounting for that the purchased software may include some licenses like windows, sql server, etc. the ratio is going to still be at least 90% of the software development performed by external developers.

I personally don't know of any technology company which has a technology offering as a core of their business, while outsourcing 90%+ of the technology development. Well, there was one company which also did this, named Globo.

firede
07/12/2015
08:03
How right they are. Watch the bounce this week lads!
joemillion
07/12/2015
07:19
InternetQ is of the view that the bloggs author is a fraud
dlku
07/12/2015
07:18
Well if that doesn't clarify things! Tw you chimp
bigfrocks
07/12/2015
06:42
;O) ... or rather ;@)
abcd1234
06/12/2015
16:59
As describe here:
lordshipstrading.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/the-pig-and-pork-scam.html

alewis2005
06/12/2015
16:45
"pig n pork"... ??
abcd1234
05/12/2015
18:08
Hi boffster, the shareprophets articles suggest that the revenue figures are fabricated, inflated by use of pig n pork. Deliotte should review the evidence and invedtigate imo.
breaktwister
Chat Pages: Latest  114  113  112  111  110  109  108  107  106  105  104  103  Older