We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internetq | INTQ | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 180.875 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180.875 | 180.875 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 04/3/2016 09:57 by elrico accrilium - please not on my behalf, I already have a problem identifying whom I am without you confusing the matter.But given the state you have got yourself into over my INTQ short and assumptions made I thought I would give you a clue on this one. It is a little misleading though because I was already short ahead of the price I picked AVN as a short. Oh, and it had nothing to do with TW/SP. |
Posted at 01/3/2016 22:50 by elrico Sparky - Highlight my lies?INTQ were trading 360p+ 11 months ago, so some PI's are taking a 50% hit. If that is success in your book, what can I say. I asked a simple question to a simple truth (lie as you say) but you refused to answer. Your evidence for me lying and costing a lot of investors a lot of money, is right up there with Akazoo converting more premium accounts than both deezer and spotify. Now all you need is MONI & GKP to pull a rabit out of the hat. Give TOSCA bell. |
Posted at 10/2/2016 00:33 by elrico Sparky - Instead of trolling with negative ticks and making silly comments like OPTI have no money and chasing a dream...OPTI was fully funded until FY 2017 before either placing, with very low cash burn and several commercial partners funding R&d on JV's. Have a look at the chart and check how long I have been in...since 15p. I will grant you the last placing was a PR own goal and said as much on the thread and to the company. That said, the new placing is locked in for a min of 3 years so it can't be flipped....now that should give even you a clue of what's ahead.Watch OPTI next week and learn something. No cooked books, no smoke & mirrors and management with a PROVEN track record. Guess where some of my profits have gone? INTQ has very limited upside from here and if the MBO don't go through, you are toast. Take your blinkers off and leave your emotions in the bedroom. |
Posted at 02/2/2016 18:12 by eastbourne1982 Analcime,Further to your earlier post which I responded to, please tell me, what is in it for Toscafund and Penta, what are they gaining out of being potentially totally corrupt, there doesn't seem to be a lot in it for them, expecially Penta who don't hold any INTQ shares as far as I'm aware. |
Posted at 25/1/2016 11:29 by elrico Sparkey - If you're suggesting the last two trading days is an indication the market thinks I'm wrong, you are deluded. Less than 9 months ago INTQ was at a heady 360p...where has the 300p gone and why? INTQ needs cash and is overvalued by 25mls. |
Posted at 01/1/2016 18:22 by elrico INTQ floated in 2010, apparently generating cash and profitable, 5 years on and E18millions in debtd apparently mopping up music app which appears to have a far supperior record, (no pun inteded) than Dezzer and Spotify combined at converting trial customers to paying subscribers.I noted Canaccord Genuity have a recent buy note for this dog, which gives mu comfort given its track record with it's inability to spot a fraud, (QPP) even when its in-house analysts highlights the red flags, which it fired. You couldn't make it up. If INTQ was so profitable, why doe's it need cash from BOTH it's bank, Baarclays and investors? Now given Barclays history supporting FRAUD GLOBO I would imagine they would not want to be caught out again with another Greek scam!I suspect Barclays will have some awkward questions to put to INTQ in the not to distant future. |
Posted at 01/1/2016 17:55 by elrico Sparky - In answer to your question, nothing, I just agree with his view.....on INTQ at any rate. Now, have you managed to do some digging into the heads-up I gave you in post 3183 or do you want someone to do your leg work for you? INTQ has more than a whiff of PP brewing.And yes, I did open my short as I said I would. Ordinarilly, I don't like the practice, BUT when companies like INTQ, QPP, AFR, GLOBO, AVNTI and Daniel Stewart get up to stunts these do, then I have another moral compass and feel shorting is what they deserve for ripping off investors. |
Posted at 17/12/2015 08:39 by dlku 0I am rather bemused in post 710 by dlku above. I have been called every name under the sun by him in regard XLM on the said thread. Presumably because I called into question XLM's accounts etc. I like to think the majority of people (if not all the people) on this thread are adult enough to see the bullish and bearish side to any stock and have a reasonable adult conversation about a stock. That is what makes this one of the better threads on advfn. However I am puzzled into the motives of the poster. Take for example INTQ mentioned above. My initial thoughts are:- - It does not look like a lovely zulu stock - It does not have a growing EPS - No dividend - Dreadful free cash flow margins. In fact 5yr free cash flow margin is minus -4.728. Free cash flow for 1yr 0.17, 1yr ago -1.885, 2yrs ago minus 4.443, 3yrs ago minus 9.099 - Greek and listed on AIM - Increasing debtors, year on year, now at £38m, more than the mkt cap. - Total liabilities at £32m - One institutional with a 71% stake? - Dreadful chart. In my view Shareprophets have hit the nail on the head with their post on INTQ. What does everyone think of INTQ? |
Posted at 03/12/2015 21:45 by smithie6 Great post !Other UK cos can be added to list of scandals.. Such as Cupid , CPP & many more ----- On subject of warning posts about shares with dodgy accounts ..the story goes back further than Woody's posts imo On Globo msg brd the poster "protection" posted in Nov/Dec 2012 warning about it....and I posted in Jan/Feb 2013 & sold ...didnt feel too clever since it then doubled !! ...I posted negative views ref. Globo after any new accounts for Globo ( many on Globo blog on website) but deaf ears......but now suspended & nothing expected for shareholders... Globo & INTQ were known as very similar in many ways including capitalization of costs....and Im sure that various warning posts can be found Many INTQ holders knew the many warnings about Globo from numerous writers....& most chose to ignore them. Problem is imo that ppl dont care....if something is going up then often ppl will buy....self generating rising spiral..and often msg brds full of people patting each other on the back... ( anyone that kept holding INTQ after Globo bust and EROS scandal was nuts....some ppl got out) If you post negative views you just get slander in reply...( I know ! ) My losses in crashes of Globo, INTQ, Vislink, Cupid, Tungsten, Blur, Monitise...ZILCH Cant force ppl to use their brains. ------ Solution ? imo -Govt regulation - harsh penalties/fines of directors and NOMADs -directors' shares to be held in AIM deposit; to stop secret selling like Globo - prison - loss of private home ( if no pain nothing will change) But imo the mkt & Govt has no interest in changes. Fulltimeinvestors.co |
Posted at 27/11/2015 01:43 by eastbourne1982 Regarding the IC article, do they actually do any research into the companies they refer to ?? INTQ's advertising is focused on mobile advertising so surely the general shift to this is a positive not a negative, also I think the impact of ad blocking will be minimal especially for a business like INTQ with such a small share of the market.Regarding today's bounce, there was no reason for it, just like there has been no genuine reason for the hammering this has taken recently. Where the share price is within 12 - 24 months is what really matters, whether people have the nerve to hold on is another question. The short to medium term aim for the business should be to focus on improving it's free cash flow, if it can do this confidence in INTQ should increase substantially. On the proviso this is not a fraud I remain confident going forward, |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
