Insig Ai Share Discussion Threads

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 20:12

hazl. What have the funds raised in the last Placing been spent on?

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 20:11

hazl. If you owned your own Company, would you employ someone you could not afford to pay?

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 20:09

hazl. What do you think the strategic advisor was ''employed'' for?

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 20:08

I dont blame any one other than myself

I criticise the Directors for the long trail of failure, as evidenced previously.

I don't give 2 hoots about your positions, as they are irrelevant as research, im just interested in research of the Company.

However you judge comments by the position.

[hazl] 21/3/2024 20:05

Ignore the macro and you will stumble.


It is highly amusing really .
You are underwater here and you blame everybody but yourself.
You blame the company, Kumbuka even me!

You pressed the button son at a higher price.

We have bought in cheaper and you dislike us for it.
What different reason can there be?

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 20:04

hazl please answer the simple question rather than deflect

[hazl] 21/3/2024 20:02

So well done for investing here!

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 19:57

hazl. Maybe you could post for us what Investors Chronical's view is of INSG, as you obvioulsy hold them in such high regard?

Have they tipped it..or...????

[pj 1] 21/3/2024 19:55

hazl Every ''industry';' or sectors, has market leaders and laggards.

The key to investing is to invest in the leaders and avoid the laggards, i.e. POS stocks

Which one is this? I'll give you a clue, Its certainly not a leader

[judijudi] 21/3/2024 17:54

It’s been bargain territory for months and months
Doesn’t look like anybody is interested to me (apart from whoever shrewd claimed he knew was buying a while ago)

[hazl] 21/3/2024 17:28

Exactly!
Rather bargain territory perhaps if you believe the industry will carry on up.

[judijudi] 21/3/2024 16:24

🤣😂
Err
Whatever anybody bought at they are now worth 16p per share!

[hazl] 21/3/2024 15:42

Why don't you sell PJ1 or is your original investment, now pretty worthless?

[judijudi] 21/3/2024 12:22

🤣😂

[hazl] 21/3/2024 12:03

PJ1

Your words

'The Directors alone have turned it into a sucker stock.

What is wrong with you?'



Wrong.


The sentiment in ESG changed to a negative stance.

Normally making a company uninvestable, for a while.
That has happened.


Will the industry find it's feet?
I expect so.

It is what our esteemed leaders want.
Mr Bernstein has put a lot of money in.


The indications are all there.

And it can be bought for a song!

[judijudi] 21/3/2024 11:08

What a 🐔

[hazl] 21/3/2024 11:05

Edit oh I see you tussle on another board!
Goodness amusing.

lol

[hazl] 21/3/2024 11:02

Funny but true mudbath.

[mudbath] 21/3/2024 10:59

"I (hazl) haven't really thanked you kumbuka for your support on this crazy board, with investors talking their own investment down.
But I have appreciated it, many of the boards have been apalling as they have lost money."

lol

[hazl] 21/3/2024 10:55

I haven't really thanked you kumbuka for your support on this crazy board, with investors talking their own investment down.

But I have appreciated it, many of the boards have been apalling as they have lost money.

Buy low sell high if you can.

[hazl] 21/3/2024 10:53

You were delighted when you thought I wouldn't be posting JJ.
So I reckon that previous poster was right.
When your little investment soured, you then played both sides of the street and went short.
PJ1 Is playing right into your hands.

[judijudi] 21/3/2024 10:48

😂🤣
Of much more relevance is where’s the much vaunted contracts?

[hazl] 21/3/2024 10:30

Thanks to Investors Chronicle.


'New FCA labels should help investors know what to expect from ESG

Funds investing with an environmental, social and governance (ESG) tilt have followed up a poor 2022 with a lukewarm 2023, as mixed performance and weak flows weighed on the sector. A range of market, political and societal factors are to blame, but investors can take some solace from the fact that the underlying trends that first prompted the move towards sustainable and ethical investing have not gone away.

A new set of regulations from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) should make it easier for investors to avoid 'greenwashing' and pick green funds that reflect their views on sustainability next year. In the meantime, investors will hope that the recent market rally is a sign of things to come.

Jason Hollands, managing director at Bestinvest, sums up current trends by stating: “Interest in ESG funds seems to have lost momentum over the last couple of years." Inflows data partially backs this up, particularly for 2023. In the first 10 months of the year, responsible investment funds saw outflows of £1.7bn, with September registering the highest outflow on record, according to the Investment Association.

The sense is that the poor performance of ESG funds last year has translated into investor outflows this year, particularly as returns remained underwhelming.

Hollands points to the 2022 performance of commodities, oil and gas, and defence stocks, which performed well in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and which are necessarily excluded from most sustainable funds, as one factor in the underperformance. Meanwhile, valuations for the growth stocks in which ESG funds tend to invest have come under pressure from higher inflation and interest rates. This year, that has been compounded by operational problems for major renewable energy companies such as Ørsted (DK:ORSTED).

Dzmitry Lipski, head of fund research at Interactive Investor, agrees, noting that a combination of higher interest rates, inflation and energy prices have both impacted performance and shifted sustainability and ESG from the investment agenda, “at least in the near term”.

On average, ESG funds are doing worse than their conventional counterparts, according to Refinitiv Lipper data. The chart below shows the extent to which ESG and conventional active equity funds have underperformed their respective benchmarks on average over one, three and five years; conventional funds come out on top across all timeframes. This year, 60.4 per cent of conventional funds underperformed, compared with 69.2 per cent of ESG fund'.


Older but very relevant.

[hazl] 21/3/2024 09:52

I have tried to bring peace to this board, but it is futile.
People behaving like little children in the playground.


If you really want to have JJ and PJ1 talking it down day after day it means nothing to me, as I am patient, more than some, and will be happy to see the market eventually show it's hand.


The people I feel sorry for are Banshee and Noujay , long termers no wonder they rarely post, they are more sensible.

And of course Kumbuka.... like me a recent entry I have never come across him on any different board, he has tried his best.

[hazl] 21/3/2024 09:46

I am sorry Kumbuka I thought you meant Langbar.
Anybody remember that company that was in trouble?
I remember little about it now,it was a long time ago.


As to elrico, yes I had no idea, that you were referred to as Langton.

As to 'we all know' rubbish, how can you 'know' something that isn't true?


The internet is being legalised more than it used to be ,so be careful with false accusations.

There is no 'mistake, 'slip up', your feathers have been ruffled that's all.