Innovision Research&technology Share Discussion Threads

[buzzzzzzzz] 20/8/2007 09:58

Masurenguy

Look at your post 130 where I thought we had parted on a friendly note, remember?

It takes a very petty individual to come back and try and point score, and reopen an old issue!

That is why I am so angry!!!

[buzzzzzzzz] 20/8/2007 09:53

Benson

ALL the stocks not just INN, all the mm's have been told to cut their books.

It is common knowledge in the city, my broker told me!

[benson] 20/8/2007 09:41

Buzzzzzz - can you tear yourself away from your spat with Masurengeuy and asnwer this which I posted last night?

I saw that EVO was always on the offer and assumed they had a large sale order. When you say 'all their books' do you mean on every stock they have a position in or just INN?

BTW,how do you know this?

[masurenguy] 20/8/2007 09:14

"Buzzzzzzzz - 20 Aug'07 - 151 of 151: Actually if you could read I have addressed the reason for the fall. Firstly the inability of the company to release the full details of the two contracts they have signed. Secondly the panic in the market. Your inability to even acknowledge that two contracts have been announced which would have justified my bullish comments is indicative of your agenda. All you are interested in doing is scoring cheap points and hiding behind a screen which demonstrates your immaturity and cheapness".

Your theory that 'the inability of the company to release the full details of the two contracts they have signed' as one of the main reasons for the falling price since June is pure conjecture. The market knows that the contracts have been signed but there is no confirmation with whom or quantification of value. Nevertheless this is a positive development so why should it cause the price to fall (unless of course it had been ramped up too far already).

I don't have an 'agenda' other than my dislike for ramping. You are also very free with your immature and unsubstantiated allegations too. First - you accused me of ramping in your post #149 above - please substantiate that allegation by illustrating what I have ramped. Second - you accuse me of hiding behind a screen - hiding what exactly ? If you mean my identity then that is an accusation you can direct at anyone who posts on ADVFN threads, including yourself ! Your claims are extremely tenuous but that is fairly typical of rampers whose stock in trade is innuendo rather than facts !

[buzzzzzzzz] 20/8/2007 08:52

Actually if you could read I have addressed the reason for the fall.

Firstly the inability of the company to release the full details of the two contracts they have signed.

Secondly the panic in the market.


Your inability to even acknowledge that two contracts have been announced which would have justified my bullish comments is indicative of your agenda.

All you are interested in doing is scoring cheap points and hiding behind a screen which demonstrates your immaturity and cheapness.

[benson] 19/8/2007 19:12

Thanks. I saw that EVO was always on the offer and assumed they had a large sale order. When you say 'all their books' do you mean on every stock they have a position in or just INN?

BTW,how do you know this? Are you still holding INN?

[buzzzzzzzz] 19/8/2007 19:08

Benson

Evo's are cutting all their books to zero holding so they sold them to KBC.

[benson] 17/8/2007 13:14

250,000 market maker trade at 33p. Not sure what to make of that.

[wooden5] 14/8/2007 14:28

looks like we are entering into exiting times.this new agreement with sony erikson is going to lead to a good few new deals..or so im told

[benson] 10/8/2007 10:49

This stock is perplexing. Falls on light volume and then rises when the market is very weak. I have watched it daily for about 6 months and I wonder if KBC are controlling the price movements - perhaps recently filling an order?

[mistertibbs] 02/8/2007 22:34

Yes, must look at that one too. looks like INN now got funding to last until significant revenues come in round about 2008. Will keep my eye on this.

Another good thread PP. Your in competition with another goodie in Garth who I know from SMRT days.

[papalpower] 01/8/2007 13:32

Katy, yes, it could well turn out to be a similar frustration, a lot of these tech stocks are.....always on the cusp......and never moving over.

I'll have a look at BLS, thanks.

[katylied] 01/8/2007 13:23

PP your contribution here is apprieciated. Unfortunately, I have
become a wee bit cynical about INN. No doubt because it is a
couple of years now since I similarly ploughed a lonely
furrow. Humbugg's earlier comment sums it up really.
I still hold some, but won't be buying more...

However, if you fancy RFID related stocks, take a peek
at BLS. It has fallen back a fair way, without any
real explanation. The current price has been very
stable (so far) during this market downturn.
I have it high on my 'to buy' list, though
that doesn't prove anything at all...

[papalpower] 01/8/2007 13:02

Added another tech stock today (BVM), this one different as its profitable and also on very low PER (current and forward).

[papalpower] 01/8/2007 08:16

Interesting, appeared to be a 100K MM buy there.

[papalpower] 30/7/2007 09:11

Thats the way of all Tech companies, however with NAN and INN they both now have completed fund raisings, which gives them the longer term scope to start generating more and more revenues.

Timing is key, for me on both I hope to see good things in 2008 and 2009.

[humbugg] 30/7/2007 09:07

Papal,
nice stuff. the crux is whether it can sell the technology. you cant keep going back to the market, continued dilution etc. NAN the same, the time will come when they have to sell the product, if not, its fu*ked.

[buzzzzzzzz] 30/7/2007 08:23

G

U missed out on SPA and you will do the same here if you are not careful.

[papalpower] 28/7/2007 15:24

More info on NFC :