We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibex Glbl | IBEX | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 113.00 | 00:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 113.00 | 113.00 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/1/2016 09:01 by gilgil13 Hi,Does anyone know what the reason (or at least stated reason) for IBEX listing in the UK as opposed to the US was? Seems strange given US HQ and 80-90% of revenue from US. Thanks |
Posted at 07/12/2015 10:36 by dasv Dan - if the market "categorically did not believe" IBEX it wouldn't be trading on 5x FCF, it would be trading at 0x FCF.I will however look into TRGI. I think you've answered your own question WRT clients by posting a link which mentions their clients. You ask "who the hell are these massive clients"? The article mentions a few clients:- "IBEX Global provides customer service for AT&T, DirectTV and Apple, according to the complaint." |
Posted at 05/12/2015 09:19 by dan_the_epic Partly, but this one is more troubling. 4. Of course, but who the hell are these massive clients where revenue is rising like a rocket ship? and for what..... call centres?! I suggest you look into TRGI and weird looking related party transactions, all RNSd. The market categorically does not believe IBEX. That is why it trades on 5x FCF |
Posted at 04/12/2015 09:04 by dasv 5 + 6. Do you mean this ?Seems like a licensing dispute which was withdrawn:- "On 31 July 2014, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Licensing, GP and the IBEX Subsidiary entered a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice and the Lawsuit was therefore withdrawn. Accordingly, no payment under the Indemnification Agreement was ever invoked and TRGI directly bore all the legal expenses associated with the Lawsuit." 4. Could say the same about OPAY (now PAYS) - reliant on a single client mainly until Skrill acquisition re allegations/facts - surely allegations are based on facts anyway? So I don't understand why you would draw a distinction. |
Posted at 03/12/2015 11:13 by taabo hxxp://www.morningst |
Posted at 03/12/2015 10:50 by imranawan Anyone know when the divi is paid? |
Posted at 12/10/2015 15:35 by mickharkins1 I just took a small opening stake today as the share looks good value - fast growing revenues with good operational gearing which should flow through to a strong growth in profits. On top, the dividend yield is impressive at over 7%. |
Posted at 29/9/2015 08:15 by referencepoint I have also made additional buys. It seems that ADVFN chooses to regard a transaction between the Bid and Offer price as a Sell irrespective of whether its a buy or sell. That pushes the price down, and other people see a falling price so decide to sell regardless of the fundamentals. Sad really, but all bodes well for the future.I originally bought in at 69p, so the current 9p annual dividend now equates to a 13% dividend on my original purchase. |
Posted at 03/6/2015 21:18 by foxman14 mrwhits I take it you are referring to the Microsoft 'court case'. That lawsuit was withdrawn on 31st July 2014 (see RNS 'Related party transaction' dated 29th September 2014). In any case any costs that may have been/were incurred by IBEX were idemnified by the group holding company TRGI.Mischief making are we? |
Posted at 25/2/2015 08:53 by wjccghcc Also had a few. Balance sheet is a bit weak but underlying debt is stable and they should start throwing off cash. 6.5% dividend yield and a PE of 6.5 makes it worth dipping in a toe. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
