I-nexus Global Share Discussion Threads

[shujja1] 12/5/2020 14:59

20p first target

[shujja1] 12/5/2020 14:59

20p first target

[shujja1] 12/5/2020 14:59

20p first target

[purple11] 12/5/2020 11:41

taken a few gla

[mcrudden] 11/5/2020 14:50

Eyes on Indeed

[ihavenoclue] 11/5/2020 14:28

60% rise and 0 posts for ages

[petewy] 13/7/2018 12:50

hxxps://www.investorschampion.com/channel/blog/june-2018-aim-new-arrivals-a-big-month-for-newcomers-and-one-giant-leaver

IS
Herald Investment Management Ltd. 4.03m 13.63%
Amati Global Investors Ltd. 3.16m 10.70%
Hargreave Hale Ltd. 2.66m 8.99%

On my watchlist. Cloud companies have been good to me.

[martywidget] 22/6/2018 06:31

Investor relations:

YouTube:


London Stock Exchange welcome i-nexus Global plc to AIM


i-nexus Global Shares Rise At It Begins Life On AIM Market (ALLISS)
21 Jun 2018 10:32


First Day of Dealings
Released 08:00 21-Jun-2018



UK-based ‘six sigma’-style software company iNexus to float in London


Small cap investors Herald and Amati back new float I-Nexus
20 June 2018, 11:09

[martywidget] 22/6/2018 06:26

!FOLLOWFEED

[wiganer] 04/1/2007 09:52

New thread started.




Btw, I don't hold and never have, though have been tempted recently.
Up 25% today.

[the skies the limit] 03/1/2007 22:23

Author: paulypilot Number: 76995 of 91072
Subject: Re: INVOX BID ?? Date: 14/11/05 17:28
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!

Recommendations: 8
Hi,

I think it's fair to say that whatever the Regulator comes up with, Invox will find a way round it. That's how this type of business operates all the time - dancing on the edge of what is permissable.

Teh bottom line is that they have a huge database of 3.5m people who are repeat responders to their offers. So the customer will keep responding providing the prizes are attractive. Exactly how that is formulated is relatively unimportant in my view.


Incidentally, I contacted Simon Cawkwell to tell him what a rotter he is shorting Invox (he knows I'm heavily long), and it turns out that he bought in his short after the Gunn announcement today.

So he made a reasonable trading turn on it intra-day.
In terms of the market, his actions will have actually helped stabilise the share price, since he softened the spike up this morning (by selling into it)& then helped bring the price back up again after it fell this afternoon on the second RNS (by buying stock to close his short).

So a nifty bit of work on his part.

Regards, Paul.

[the skies the limit] 03/1/2007 22:14

Well evil didn't get burnt after all but pp did...

Author: paulypilot Number: 76985 of 91072
Subject: Re: INVOX BID ?? Date: 14/11/05 16:30
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!

Recommendations: 3
Hi,

Indeed, I was flabberghasted to see that EK has shorted Invox today. His logic looks muddled to me. Fair enough he doesn't believe the Daily Mail story, but the price only went up about 3 or 4p on the back of that story anyway, hardly a great opportunity to open a short, surely ?

The stock is highly illiquid as well, so if the big seller is done (Paul Hargrave) then EK could find it very difficult to close his short without forcing the share price up considerably. And that of course would pull in loads more buyers, making the situation a lot worse for him.

I cannot see the sense in shorting something on a PER of 4.7, the clever money has already been made for shorters.

Let's hope Simon gets burned on this one ! It makes me uneasy having an opposing position to EK, but he gets plenty of things wrong. Let's hope this is one of them !

Altogether a very bizarre day on this stock !! Bid, no bid, former Director selling, and a Bear raid, all on one day !!!! :-)
Encouraging that the price is unchanged on the day though.

Regards, Paul.

[the skies the limit] 03/1/2007 22:09

Yes that was him...lol

[the skies the limit] 03/1/2007 21:55

Hi Ratty and who was that other dummy that was with PP...LOL

No wonder they call em fools on the TMF. Very apt.

[loverat] 03/1/2007 21:53

£250,000 is more than just a mistake.

Besides, other more astute investors saw through the management before
the news came out that they had wrecked the company.

Pauly spent 2 hours with the management on a one to one basis at the last
AGM and he fell for it hook, line and sinker. What is worse, other investors invested on the basis of his write up of that meeting.

[Abuse team] 03/1/2007 21:39

Post removed by ADVFN

[the skies the limit] 03/1/2007 21:19

The times you and fusey warned the board about pp i lost count.

I think its a disgace. That £250,000 that paulpilot lost could have gone to charity.

Other investors lost huge sums as well.

[the skies the limit] 03/1/2007 21:17

Paulypilot the ramper apologises and blames managment of INVOX for his own folly...



The fact of the matter is fusebox warned that INVOX was a dog and paulypilot coud not be trusted as he was ramping it for his own ends.

[loverat] 03/1/2007 20:52

I wonder how many shareholders turned up for the AGM this year.

Anyway, has anybody set up a new thread under the new name?

[plast] 01/1/2007 19:12

brightview, hum sounds like they are going into double glazing.
lets all hope this will change things around, three name changes since ive held them, if they carry on changing there name at some point they may , i say may just get it right, but im not holding my breath.

ps, invox, its not the name that needs to be changed its your way of thinking.

[rbonnier] 14/12/2006 11:14

I dont think anyone imagined the enormity of the destruction of the company thats why we all got our back sides wacked with this one.
£5 MILLION ANNUAL PROFITS TO £50K LOSSES OVERNIGHT??????
That is the magnitude of this incredible disaster which is quite unbelievable as these were not flash in the pan profits this company was highly profitable and cash generative for 5 years .
Only Paul Parry knows how he managed to destroy 99% of shareholders funds overnight I dont think we ever will.

[loverat] 13/12/2006 15:08

What a difference a year makes on the AIM.

Who would have believed that the management here would have wrecked the company
and reduced the share price to 10p?

[loverat] 13/12/2006 07:51

I think Envesta failed because the directors were a bunch of
crooks. Not sure if it's the same here or if they have just been
totally incompetent. They have certainly brought the company
to its knees far quicker than anyone could imagine.