I-nexus Global Share Discussion Threads

[amorruso] 28/2/2006 15:00

Surely there is a limit to where this is heading? I understand how you feel mate.

[rbonnier] 28/2/2006 11:33

Masurenguy

>I am not Fusebox just one ducking p!ssed off shareholder holding this pile of incredible cr@p Nuff Said I Think.!

[mikey_b] 28/2/2006 11:23

Mas, ignore the trolls:

These are the users that you have chosen to filter out of the BBs

fusebox
Jesuz
Loverat
saltedcrab
Spectrum7
THE CHARTISTS

[masurenguy] 28/2/2006 11:22

"Heading slowly downwards I see to my absurd price target of 40p I wouldnt be surprised if profits were to exceed the market cap at some point..!!"

Hey Fusepox that pos EKT, which you stupidly ramp all of the time, is down 8.5% today. Why is that then ??

[rbonnier] 28/2/2006 11:18

Heading slowly downwards I see to my absurd price target of 40p I wouldnt be surprised if profits were to exceed the market cap at some point..!!

[masurenguy] 28/2/2006 11:14

"Not interested in INX but cant stand these two faced idiots who use the BB's to further their own ends...."

You berated me for posting on the TG21 board recently since I was not an investor in that company so why are you being a hypocrite and posting here ?

[spectrum7] 24/2/2006 13:02

Maybe GSands will now clarify why he ranted and raved at the "cretins" selling out of CYH......and then the very next day.....sold out ;-)
Not interested in INX but cant stand these two faced idiots who use the BB's to further their own ends....

[mikey_b] 24/2/2006 10:40

Many thanks for the clarity provided.

[gsands] 24/2/2006 10:35

Oh dear, why do these small cap threads attract so many cretins? Hopefully Paul will log on soon and moderate some of you.

Mikey_b,

In answer to your question re AMT - I was holding the stock when it dropped to 120p on fear and small PI selling despite overwhelming fundamental evidence to suggest that the stock was becoming ridiculously undervalued (based upon known knowledge)

I see a similiar situation here. Based upon known fundamental knowledge, this company should not be trading so cheaply. BUT of course, there is always that 'unknown' element - which is where the risk lies.

However, to simply conclude as some posters/ private investors have done, that the share price dropping is indicative of problems ahead, is completely daft.

Peruse the chart below to see what I mean:


free stock charts from ADVFN.COM



To put the above in context, the small panic selling punters who were 'robbed' of their stock sold at 120p sold at 66.6% lower than the current share price of 200p.

Quite a lot of upside for the smart cookies who were buying the stock then.

I am not saying that the same will happen here.

Maybe it will, maybe it won't.

But my money is on the table and if there is any further weakness then I will be buying more. The risk/reward is in my favour and every tick down makes it more so IMO.

[mikey_b] 23/2/2006 22:41

ah, like fuzzbox/speccy/lovemouse

[Abuse team] 23/2/2006 22:27

Post removed by ADVFN

[spectrum7] 23/2/2006 22:10

""Every heard of Japenese poker? Every time you lose you double your stake until you win""
..........said Nick Leason ;-)...what a stupid policy...grow up for christ sake !!

[spectrum7] 23/2/2006 22:09

GSands

I remember you prattling on like this about CYH.......
A warning to everyone....What GSands says and what he does are to completely different things ;-)...I am afraid he is just out to mislead...DYOR !!!

[mikey_b] 23/2/2006 22:01

what happened next?

[gsands] 23/2/2006 21:07

Every heard of Japenese poker? Every time you lose you double your stake until you win.

This slide in share price on low volume PI selling is perfect. Just a little bit more and I can double my holding.

Been in this situation before with AMT.

[gaybriefs] 23/2/2006 19:34

Well Ive been well and truly stung with this one,cant even stomach a top up to average down at these levels as there appears to be just no end to the continuous slippery slope to 0p.

[masurenguy] 23/2/2006 17:23

Mmmm...INX is down about as much as that pos EKT so far this year.

[fusebox] 23/2/2006 16:43

Balance sheet awful dividend on hold and operating in a dubious sector.

All bad news.

This share price has an awfull long way to fall yet.

[obbie11] 23/2/2006 13:17

GSands - I think the management like to keep their entry into on-line bingo low key and not make too much fuss incase they end up with egg on their face (my opinion only). I am sure their aim is to build the bingoloopy into a reputable brand that a large number of people play regularly. This is being achieved by creating a community within the bingo game and by special offers.

I've attempted to put my own numbers on the bingo site, which are all very subjective. From my own figures you may find the following interesting:

The bingo games I've seen have over 200 players (this is Sat evening), which I assume are all from Invox bingo sites; bare in mind that in a typical game the avarage cost per player per game is variable (£0.60 to £3.00) and that a game can occur every 7 mins. The player's prices may be 70-80% of the total ticket sales. So you can use that to build your own figures.

[wiganer] 23/2/2006 12:38

The problems isn't the P&L, it's the balance sheet.

If one is going to focus on EPS before goodwill amortisation, then to be consistent one has to look at the net assets excluding goodwill. They are negative, i.e. INX's liabilities exceed its assets.

[gsands] 23/2/2006 12:31

I am surprised the management haven't made more of their entry into the online gambling market. It seems to me that this 'could' grow into something quite big and does seem to fit well with existing businesses. The product can be marketed to database customers and Brightview users.

Has anyone attempted to put some numbers to this enterprise?

We ought to be able to find out how many hits the bingoloopy website is getting too.

[tobyblair] 18/2/2006 10:52

target 25p