Simply Magic with plenty of Activity and Success ahead!!
Confidence Grows with Value Creation.
CEO confirmed..Testing at Darwin #1, in the Rudyard project is due to commence on 2 December 2024.
Huge Value Creation expected so get on the Train.. |
target='window'>Https:hxxps://youtu.be/J-D8nN3sIGg
Get ready as we have Testing liftoff Monday Dec 2nd.
Massive Value and pipeline ahead...WoW!
Simply Magic with plenty of Activity and Success ahead!! |
https://youtu.be/J-D8nN3sIGg |
No rigs on site ! There testing at one well and stimulating at second . |
Great Value potential with a Broker holding a 93p share price
These levels can prove substantial and with testing Monday 2 Dec not long to wait only Hours away!!
Plenty of Drilling in the pipeline with more potential expect an explosive week ahead.
Happy Days Ahead as CEO Confidence Grows..
Dont miss out and Get On The Train like Smart Investors. |
Stevie thinks Bo could have done with a bit more makeup on the video |
Interview from yesterday added to links above |
The problem with hype is that eventually you get found out.
Which devalues everything you subsequently come out with.
Anyone adding now is presumably giving Directors the benefit of the doubt. My sense is that when things don't initially go to plan, averaging down is - more often than not - a bad move. But good luck to anyone who thought otherwise today. |
Cheers Steve, all the best. I am staying hoping that Rudyard will be decent and they can stimulate Clink 1 and get it flowing. My confidence in Bo and DM has taken a big knock - wouldn't have been so bad without all the rampy pointless tweets. |
The interview was scripted, and Bo was actually reading his answers, as his eyes looked down at the script. Nonetheless, I felt his words were sincere about the future prospects, although his body language and facial expression seemed to show some embarrassment. I would anticipate that his exuberance will be more contained in future! I am happy to conceive the current situation as a temporary set back, and Rudyard will certainly help to rectify things, and to return confidence again. It's a temporary unexpected knock back, which has probably caused a more severe reaction due to Bo and David's expressed over confidence, and over excited twitter messages. |
I’m a buyer here now. Margin calls all done and dusted imo, and still plenty of potential upside to go after. |
There is no way to Sugar coat this, relevant that we are in Christmas period and Investors will not risk their Money, they will play safe, OUT.
Fortunately for me, I needed a wedge last Month and sold. Pure luck.
GLA Who remain. |
Bo looking deflated like the sp! Suet |
next few rnss better be good |
Jungmana i think the mud log 55% Hydrogen number is a red herring as the gas sample showed 0.7% so forget the Hydrogen |
Minchin and Bo are both undermined and should zip it going forward. Ok they both have a lot at stake but that is no excuse. Sort it please and behave responsibly. Suet |
Yup they have damaged trust pushing it the way they did on Twitter. If the next result isn't positive then that will do further damage.
They suddenly seem to have urgency to stimulate Clink 1 which they didn't before.
Today hurt but I am not selling any .... yet.
They have no discovery unless it is backed up with third party lab data as you mentioned. |
the key is the flathead zone where they found the 2.5% helium and 55% hydogen. it is the main producer in the Montana fairway. if that flows , then we will be doing great. |
Well if you look at the historic data for the Charles formation it hasnt flowed commercial rates. Imho its looking like clink 1 and the Ingomar dome could well be uneconomical
A case of zones having economical flow and uneconomical Helium and zones with economical Helium and uneconomical flow. |
yes i understand. with stimulation, should flow fingers crossed |
Jungmana worth remembering the Flathead hasnt flowed.
If the flow is poor then the Flathead will also be non commercial. |
Hooded Claw - glad you’re back in Hex’s Wacky Races.
What do you make of today’s RNS in the grand scheme of things?
Whilst perhaps not a defining moment, my view is that it’s severely undermined Minchin’s credibility. And - given his recent interviews about Amsden - called into question his fitness to be a Director of any public company.
IMHO it also means any future tweets showing gas-gushing wells or the like will be discounted by investors as entirely irrelevant, unless there’s firm data to back up commerciality. |
https://x.com/rckhlldd/status/1861763863009480958?s=46 |