ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

CLO Gx Cloudcomp

9.679
0.1315 (1.38%)
28 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Name Symbol Market Type
Gx Cloudcomp LSE:CLO London Exchange Traded Fund
  Price Change % Change Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Traded Last Trade
  0.1315 1.38% 9.679 9.642 9.717 9.779 9.545 9.66 3,038 16:35:16

Gx Cloudcomp Discussion Threads

Showing 26 to 48 of 50 messages
Chat Pages: 2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/8/2006
01:25
ALERT ALERT. This share is being delisted and effectively practically worthless on Sept 14 2006. The directors hold 70% of the shares and are voting in favour of delisting what they claim is CLO's 4% stake in Charlton Athletic.
SELL SELL SELL

mryesyes
15/6/2005
19:14
NCU is a much better buy , Pays a 8% Divi as well, and we have got Scott Parker to boot .... any way we choose.

B

biswell
15/6/2005
18:08
I keep re-reading it and it does appear to say that. I've never heard of a new issue at such a premium. When they set it you could have bought at less than half the issue price (although I shouldn't imagine it would have stayed there if you were looking to buy 9 million of them).
If there's no more to this than meets the eye then it's refreshing to see the insiders being so generous to the club/company.

t

tomrob
15/6/2005
16:16
Apparently!?
maxinvestor
15/6/2005
16:14
Placing at 60p a share when you can get them at 38??? Sounds crazy!! Is this right??
sawbones
05/5/2004
16:30
7th on the percentage gainers today shame there's no UEFA place for that.
t

tomrob
31/1/2004
11:06
curbs moving on is a definite possibility now....the again he has made a big issue over loyalty with scotty going under a cloud...I doubt he would do the same in a hurry....
badabing2004
31/1/2004
11:03
Bad for player and both clubs IMO.

Chelsea now have players bought since the Russian arrived who alrready don't figure in future plans.Where do Smertin,Geremi,Cole & Veron even? fit in. This leaves many players already uncertain about whether they'll be shipped out after a couple of bad games (Mutu seems to get bad body languauge from the Bosski when he misses; what price he leaves in Summer) - stability is key.

Charlton loose a talisman and £10M won't replace him, Curbishley is more convinced than ever that his ambitions will need to be fulfilled elsewhere, and Parkers chances will be intermittent, especially if he makes a heistant start. Lampard and Makelele (sic?) have to be first choice?

Expect he'll score the winner at highbury in the cup after all that!

madgooner
31/1/2004
10:53
and our turnover is 3 x that...+ nearly £10m in bank this year from the sale of scotty and improving incomes from Sky for more coverage, increased gate receipts, a much higher finish in the league means CAFC will be quids in this year...and very good chance of EUFA cup football next year....an undervalued stock if you look at it business terms.....ps I thought WHU were your main feeder club these days.....
badabing2004
30/1/2004
19:25
PS: Just noted that your Market Capitalisation is £11m - We should have bought you as a feeder club !!!!!!
flackwell-raineri
30/1/2004
09:22
congratulations to cfc on getting parker...good business for both clubs in the end...nad as a shareholder I'm happy..as a fan..gutted..still can't have it all..just hope he isn't picked against us at the bridge next week
badabing2004
24/1/2004
09:22
Madgooner - I hope your views of Parkers mental state proove right - Come on Scotty .................................Sign on the dotted line.
flackwell-raineri
23/1/2004
19:03
Chelsea increase Parker offer
By Leo Spall, Evening Standard
23 January 2004

Chelsea today made their third bid this month for Scott Parker, which Charlton are now considering.

Roman Abramovich's club have already had a "final" bid worth £7.5million, rising to £9m after 90 appearances, rejected.

But they have now gone back to Charlton with an improved offer for the England midfielder, who could become a Chelsea player in the next few days.

Charlton have stood firm so far and believe that the first two bids seriously undervalued Parker, who they consider to be one of the best young players in the country.

The football club chairman Martin Simons launched a broadside at Chelsea this week when he told Abramovich to "get lost".

However, Parker has been disappointed that his lucrative move was blocked after believing he had an agreement that would allow him to join one of the Premiership title contenders.

The 23-year-old has no get-out clause in his contract, which has more than four years left to run, but with the saga dragging on he has found it difficult to focus on his football. As a result, he was dropped from his side's 1-0 win at Everton last week and was sent home from training yesterday.

Chelsea are confident that their ability to pay huge transfer fees up front will enable them to do a deal .

A Chelsea source said: "We can pay a large percentage of the transfer fee up front which is increasingly rare these days and works in our favour.

"In the summer a lot of our deals were settled up front. If we agree a fee with Charlton then the discussion with the player will be very quick. It's a game of poker and there are still 10 days to go."

badabing2004
19/1/2004
15:09
Come on you Reds ! Still riding high in premier league, £10m bid coming for Scott Parker, Europe beckons (Eufa rather than Champions League) but not bad for a club that was bust and without a home just 10 years ago...what a recovery story and look at Leeds for the flip side....bring on the Bolton...shares are looking a bit healthier too and must be one for recovery during 2004 if this form continues, just look at the extra incomes over last season and if we do sell Scotty, well he will be a great loss, but £10m biguns is not to be sneezed at....
badabing2004
09/1/2004
11:35
+10% today....no news/volumes...??
badabing2004
05/1/2004
09:56
What a rotten club.
qazwsx123
05/1/2004
09:56
What a rotten club.
qazwsx123
05/1/2004
09:56
What a rotten club.
qazwsx123
31/12/2003
08:55
MG,

Maybe the fundamentals are not so great, but compared to most football clubs this is an oasis and we reduced losses from £10.7m last year to just £0.5 this year. In our current season, we benefit from more incomes through:

- Larger gates
- Much increased TV revenues
- Improved off-pitch and corporate incomes
- Hopefully, a much improved finish in the league
- Even a decent FA cup run perhaps (if we can beat the pykies this weekend)

Anyway, I admit it, I am blinkered but still like the look of 2003/04 season to date.

badabing2004
30/12/2003
23:28
Hmm..

NTA below current price, no profits and debt 300% of current market capitialisation..I'm no chartist, but the fundamentals are scary, before:-

-Declining football revenues
-Performance risk (what if you get relegated?)
-Overly strong player power
-Personnel risk, Scott Parker and Curbishly for spurs?? though heaven knows why either would..

madgooner
30/12/2003
23:24
chopsy, don't be so sure. Unsucessfully backed that horse from a long way out when Newcastle came from behind to make the champs league..got the footy right but still holding the NUFC shares from 120p (thankfully it was a play not investment type holding)..Same year got the Sheff U shares on a promotion hope, they made it up, I lost on the shares....Football has a civ called players wages IMO.
madgooner
30/12/2003
20:00
Going up now. Still 4th place. If CLO get into Europe that's big money.
chopsy
30/12/2003
15:08
Ticked up on the offer today....20p to buy....cheap as chips these are....
badabing2004
Chat Pages: 2  1