Globaldata Share Discussion Threads

[farnesbarnes] 17/7/2007 16:11

And the price has bounced back nicely.

(shhhhh...)

[kenbachelor] 17/7/2007 15:14

I must say it takes a lot to get you lot excited. Not one post in the last week.

[johndee] 09/7/2007 08:37

sold 1m ..average 25.8 pence....but lost lots on other shares.........

[johndee] 09/7/2007 08:36

yes..had 1 million before split.sold before split too

[kenbachelor] 09/7/2007 08:27

When making comparisons, don't forget the split (10:1) in 2001.

[johndee] 09/7/2007 08:16

went to 5.60 while i held..missed on the big profits...........had 100,000 of them.........................

[kenbachelor] 09/7/2007 07:37

You did very well then.

I don't remember them before 28 September 2000, when I realized that card payment on the net was bound to be good in the future. I bought at 168.79p and saw most of it disappear within the first 12 months. Having bought more since they recovered, I now have 50k at an average of 173.35p.

[johndee] 09/7/2007 07:18

I remember now. I sold out t equiv of 2.80

[johndee] 09/7/2007 07:18

yes...and Auxinet used to be called corporate executive search...thanks.......

[kenbachelor] 09/7/2007 06:25

Datacash used to be called Auxinet!

[johndee] 09/7/2007 00:06

is this the same company that was called corporate executive search 1998 to 2001 or so?...shares went from about 1.25 pence to about 56 pence within 18 months...................highest point was on 29th feb 2000..equiv now to 5.60 pounds..................

[kenbachelor] 06/7/2007 11:38

What have we done to deserve this morning's rise?

[scburbs] 27/6/2007 13:46

"The Group has seen good growth in both revenue and transaction volumes so far
this year. Revenues lost from the fallout in the US are continuing to be
replaced as our customers expand their operations in other countries."



Interesting statement if rather opaque. When they say good growth, do they mean good growth excluding the fallout in the US? When they say revenues lost are continuing to be replaced do they mean they are being replaced or that this is a gradual process and, therefore, they are actually down?

[scburbs] 27/6/2007 11:38

Rigrat,

There was a reason the share price crashed last year (I don't mean crash bankrupt, I mean crash substantial fall). DATA has yet to report any results relating to periods after the US gaming law change.

At the time, Investec estimated that US gaming accounted for 30% sales and 40-45% of profits.

You need rather more than sound management for the business to be worth more than before the US law change. Contract news has been positive, but I think the full negative from the lost business is not currently reflected in the share price.

[rigrat] 27/6/2007 09:18

I think the company has sound management, DATACRASH,NEVER. The more likely scenario is the likelyhood of a share scam operation. The AIM has been easy pickings for the criminal mindset.Some,will have been taken in by the promise of huge returns.

[scburbs] 26/6/2007 16:47

Either it will bounce at this level or Datacash will become Datacrash. I am holding onto my short position as it looks fundamentally overvalued to me.

[farnesbarnes] 26/6/2007 16:23

I'm more concerned that i) the uptrend may be broken, and ii) the 245 level has to hold.

[stuart37] 26/6/2007 13:19

Getting close to a trade on the long side...........

[kenbachelor] 18/6/2007 12:56

I withdraw the question. The trades show zero buys and 27,000 in small sells, so the answer is obvious.

[kenbachelor] 18/6/2007 12:41

Does anybody know what is causing today's fall?

[farnesbarnes] 04/6/2007 11:54

SSHHHHHHHHHHHH...

[kenbachelor] 04/6/2007 11:44

Up another 5p this morning and still nobody getting excited on here, except for me.

I'm currently in profit over £49,000 and not even considering selling.

[guythomas] 31/5/2007 20:51

so why isn't earthport following suit since they have a partnership with datacash

[aerotus] 31/5/2007 20:26

Blimey! This share price doesn't know the meaning of down!