We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Getech Group Plc | GTC | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
8.50 | 8.50 | 8.50 | 8.50 |
Industry Sector |
---|
OIL EQUIPMENT SERVICES & DISTRIBUTION |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 29/2/2024 11:10 by 32campomar GTC are doing exactly what Kobold are doing in America.And look what’s happened to their share price over there. |
Posted at 22/2/2024 14:16 by 32campomar If GTC can successfully demonstrate AI can more accurately locate resources, these shares will fly.Next few year could be something very similar to the dotcom bubble when anything linked to the internet soared. AI I think will be just as big and the catalyst for a boom - just look at Nvidia's valuation in the US |
Posted at 07/2/2024 11:23 by rivaldo Interesting post from GTC's LinkedIn a few days ago:"Lamborghini detailed the extension of its decarbonisation strategy on Tuesday, making the electrification of its lineup the most significant investment in the history of the company. We are using our Globe earth model to identify sedimentary lithium deposits, crucial for the burgeoning electromobility sector. Discover how our cutting-edge methodology is shaping the future of sustainable lithium mining: hashtag#GTC hashtag#Lithium hashtag#CriticalMine |
Posted at 29/12/2023 20:06 by yump In an article about Baker Hughes (clients in O&G), Hargreaves lansdown state that after an extended quiet period, O&G exploration is booming.I don’t know the comparative spend between 2015 and now, but in 2015 GTC had revenue of 8mln and pretax of about 2mln. If the O&G revenues are not picking up and reported as picking up by GTC, why not ? Have they permanently lost clients in O&G and are just scrabbling around in new markets, or have they become distracted ? |
Posted at 19/12/2023 21:39 by yump Book5Are you incapable of understanding that GTC don’t have to have a patent in order to have IP which has value ? A patent is a form of IP. IP does not necessarily mean a patent. This is O-level maths. Sets, subsets, intersecting circles representing them to show which ones overlap, which ones are separate, which ones are inside another one. The pictorial representations so that youngsters understand. I’ll try again: GTC can have something to offer (IP) that is not a patent. It seems GTC are very unlikely to have something patentable - as I already explained. But they may well have IP. You think they have nothing because they would have patented it. No they wouldn’t, if it wasn’t a patentable invention. But that doesn’t mean they have nothing, which is what you claim. Are you posting just to waste my tine or do you enjoy looking daft ? Patents are a subset of IP. Not having a patent doesn’t mean they lack IP. You may believe they have nothing, but not patenting anything is not evidence that they have nothing. If you think it is evidence that they have nothing, then you are simply wrong in that assumption. It is an illogical conclusion resulting from an error in your thinking. |
Posted at 17/12/2023 20:52 by book5 YumpU said to me “You’ve made an assumption that GTC have nothing special to offer.” Then you said: “The chances of GTC patenting anything is imo zero.” My point was that GTc has nothing special to offer because it does not have a patent It seems you agree with me. You contradict yourself. It would help if you were honest with yourself. You should explain what GTC has to offer that is “special.̶ U divert the discussion by making personal attacks I said before this would go to 5p, and I was right This will reach to 3.5p during 2024 |
Posted at 17/12/2023 14:16 by yump You said GTC would patent something valuable if they had it and yet you clearly don’t understand the difference between patents and IP rights.You keep changing the points you’re making, so there’s no point in entering into any debate with you. You make your assumptions and I’ll make mine. Be nice if you based them on facts and actually read what I have posted properly. I did not say that GTC amortised anything. I clearly made a general point about IP amortisation to try to explain to you how IP can have a value that is nothing to do with a patent. The chances of GTC patenting anything is imo zero, unless they have a fancy drilling machine with some AI hydrogen detecting computer attached to it. |
Posted at 17/12/2023 00:14 by book5 YumpYou refer to “amortisation in accounts.” OK, please tell us what value GTC gives to any “IP” we may own in the balance sheet, and what is its annual amortisation? The latest annual accounts show 2.9 million intangible assets, but since then, GTC has closed the hydrogen business unit. What type of IP do we own? A patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, or combination. Is it only applicable to O&G? We own software that the market does not find very valuable, and the evidence is in our market cap. |
Posted at 15/12/2023 14:27 by yump Book5You’ve got a GTC price list then ? Don’t know what your motive is but you seem to be making things up with no evidence. GTC’s original business was doing fine until O&G exploration tanked. Nothing to do with pricing. Nothing to do with local preference. Nothing known about whether GTC are losing out to competitors. Even if it was the latter, for a business as small as GTC’s, the market is big enough to get a decent share. You’ve made an assumption that GTC have nothing special to offer. That isn’t borne out by their previous O&G success or the current order book. Fair enough if you just don’t believe any of it. |
Posted at 17/10/2023 16:46 by yump Sigh! Again, please explain to us all, what would have happened with H2Green, that hasn't happened because of government. As I said, Inverness has millions from the Scottish gov, so what is the problem there ?I don't recall any announcements from GTC. What were they hoping to achieve ? We just don't know, because it was all just paper plans with nothing specific on exactly how GTC were going to develop asset value. Apart from mentioning 'asset' a lot on the part of Copus. What were GTC expecting to happen, that has been thwarted by the government ? I'm interested in facts, I don't give a toss who is in power. Where does GTC detail the plans and explain how government has messed them up ? I think GTC may have suffered from unlucky timing, in that the rise in interest rates has made debt and raising money very difficult and/or expensive. (blame Truss if you like, even though they were rising before her October idiocy and continued afterwards). (Anyone who thinks interest rates would have been nice and friendly without Truss, is living in cloud cuckoo land. Other much bigger things have been happening, haven't they ?) So any plans to invest in the (virtual ?) H2Green projects, in order to get asset value at some point when the projects developed, will have been scuppered. I think the comment in the RNS is a complete giveaway and an admission of a mistaken adventure on GTC's part. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com |
ADVFN UK Investors Hub ADVFN Italy ADVFN Australia ADVFN Brazil |
ADVFN Canada ADVFN Germany ADVFN Japan ADVFN Mexico |
ADVFN France ADVFN US ADVFN Korea |