We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geong | LSE:GNG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B1570688 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.625 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
12/9/2014 13:19 | They said the same thing last year Way-hey and up she rises | sefton1 | |
12/9/2014 13:11 | Reduction in o/s accruals hasn't apparently led to an increase in cash. Auditors also questioning likelihood of getting accruals in. | evaluate | |
12/9/2014 13:07 | Results are quite encouraging with a reduction in outstanding accruals | sefton1 | |
11/9/2014 15:33 | Ok if the week commences on the 9th it ends on the 15th - so i would guess 4.31pm Monday 15th September. | rmillaree | |
11/9/2014 14:38 | Leaky as an old sieve. Must be a good trading update. | sir rational | |
11/9/2014 14:37 | Must be tomorrow then. | sir rational | |
10/9/2014 18:03 | You said that yesterday or is there an echo on this board | sefton1 | |
10/9/2014 17:52 | Tomorrow it is, I reckon. | sir rational | |
09/9/2014 17:30 | it now expects to release its audited results for the year ended 31 March 2014 during the week commencing 9 September 2014 Actually Monday was 8th not 9th (even in China). Tomorrow it is. | sir rational | |
08/9/2014 20:10 | I thought the Chinese 'New Week' always starts on a Tuesday? Explains the frenzied buying I suppose. | marth | |
08/9/2014 17:25 | Results out this week, chaps, tomorrow probably, 7am, I think the clue is in the typo '9'. | sir rational | |
04/9/2014 18:56 | Little bird tells me they collected £2m you were possibly not expecting. Means receivables are now getting paid. A bit late but better than never. £20m on the way. | sir rational | |
04/9/2014 07:09 | Mattjos, good to see you here. Looking forward to your input. An 84k buy at 4.73p straight off the bell today already. | rivaldo | |
03/9/2014 13:20 | Some optimism ahead. Already broken through the 100 and 200 MA. IG not accepting any more long positions here either. | sefton1 | |
03/9/2014 13:08 | 4.95p paid now | ryan83 | |
03/9/2014 13:08 | well ARC, capped at £3m, cash around £700k, and just profitable, in a high growth sector. Lacklustre results just out but good outlook. TRD, always high turnover (£20m or something) but hardly make any profit. Thats why investors are put off with those. I do however like ARC. GNG - chinese, no one believes the cash position (hence sell off every trading update after a spike) and always has high recievables that they seem to struggle to collect. | ryan83 | |
03/9/2014 13:03 | "AIM investors seem obsessed with chasing "jam tomorrow" oilies or empty shells, rather than real companies with existing revenue and profit streams." -------------------- I think that the term 'real company' - pretty much rules out GNG | augustusgloop | |
03/9/2014 12:56 | There are dozens of these types of undervalued stocks on AIM at the moment -- where the marcap is less than revenues / cash or a weak multiple of profits -- typically because the companies reside in unfashionable segments like software or recruitment. TRD, ARC, GNG, to name but three examples. AIM investors seem obsessed with chasing "jam tomorrow" oilies or empty shells, rather than real companies with existing revenue and profit streams. A bit of a shame. | skier100 | |
03/9/2014 12:31 | use LOG scale on EW charts. I've hilited as the second leg down as none of the rallies within it overcame the previous high so, consider it as one long leg of the retreat. At the end of it, it did rally over the previous reaction high - just! But, then continued to fall as Leg 3 played out. The first Upleg did significantly overcome the previous reaction high and then on retrace, it did not fall below its start level so, the theory is intact at present. In any event, since I'm in the stock now, I will sit and see if it plays out to the theory or not, irrespective of others opinions. | mattjos | |
03/9/2014 12:27 | the second leg down was only the longest due to the misleading scale you are using? | geheimnis2 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions