ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

GCP Gcp Infrastructure Investments Limited

74.70
-0.70 (-0.93%)
22 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Gcp Infrastructure Investments Limited LSE:GCP London Ordinary Share JE00B6173J15 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.70 -0.93% 74.70 74.70 75.10 75.50 74.80 75.40 896,353 16:35:02
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt 51.71M 30.91M 0.0355 21.07 651.68M
Gcp Infrastructure Investments Limited is listed in the Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker GCP. The last closing price for Gcp Infrastructure Inves... was 75.40p. Over the last year, Gcp Infrastructure Inves... shares have traded in a share price range of 59.50p to 88.50p.

Gcp Infrastructure Inves... currently has 871,232,650 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Gcp Infrastructure Inves... is £651.68 million. Gcp Infrastructure Inves... has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 21.07.

Gcp Infrastructure Inves... Share Discussion Threads

Showing 526 to 550 of 925 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  25  24  23  22  21  20  19  18  17  16  15  14  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
30/5/2023
17:04
cc2014, thx fair enough, but they maybe slightly false too in so much as it gives capital for equity sales to chase at maturity
Presume you know gilts quite good, tn25 4.80% and gilts cgt free

hindsight
30/5/2023
13:14
#531

Some of them no. I wouldn't lend to if not protected. That's a fair point.

But some of them yes. Investec at 5.15%. Shawbrook at 5.06%. Close Brothers at 5.01%

cc2014
30/5/2023
12:51
@dp - "inflation only becomes entrenched when it is fuelled by wage rises and raising interest rates, in the face of a tight labour market, does that"


There's a job at the Turkish Central Bank waiting for you ;)

Wages rising at over 6% atm, which goes a long way to explaining why Core is 6.8%. Higher interest rates are needed to press down harder on demand & create unemployment.

Or, we could go further down the immigration route. Or find an answer to the c.2.5m on the sick.

In other news, GCP appears to be bouncing a little off the bottom.

spectoacc
30/5/2023
12:34
cc2014, lets be honest the FSCS bonds are a false market, would you lend to those banks if it was not protected ?
hindsight
30/5/2023
11:33
So why then with a wall of quarter of a trillion pounds of private lockdown savings and an economy opening up to supply side constraints did the MPC preside over zero interest rates and continued to print. It's simply beyond any reason and poured fuel onto a fire already out of control, not least in the housing Market where they caused a boom that we needed like a hole in the head. And though house prices aren't part of CPI, higher costs feed through to general inflation and wage demands.

( reply to Donald Pond, concur with CC2014)

stewart64
30/5/2023
11:31
I wanted to reply to your post Stewart but tbh I really don't know where to start without having a rant about the incompetenance of central banks and government treasury departments which would go on and on and on.

I will try to be brief.

It is obvious in economics regardless of whether you prefer John Maynard Keynes or Milton Friedman that printing money causes inflation. Well obvious to me anyway. Obvious to Theresa May too with her "there is no Magic Money Tree" quote a vieled reference to MMT (Modern Monetay Theory) all the central banks experts were promoting

So, we had the QE from the 2007/08 which never got unwound. Then we had the Brexit QE which never got unwound and then Covid arrived.

And the Covid QE is where things get really bad because the Covid QE was pushed into circulation with little economic output. I point this out very carefully as at least with all the other QE it kind of ended up being spent on stuff. Hospitals or roads were built. They might have been built inefficiently at too high a price but at least there was some asset produced of benefit to society. The Covid cash produced very little economic output. True helicopter money.

And the rest we know.
"Inflation won't occur"
"Inflation is transitory"
"Core inflation won't rise"

To sort of use a medical analogy. If every time the patient is ill, the patient is given higher and higher doses of drugs to keep them happy, eventually it becomes apparent the drugs are no longer helping the patient but harming them. Now we have to wean oursevles off the drugs. And the patient is going to kick and scream because the withdrawal symptoms are going to be long lasting and painful.


The challenge is that if I look at markets they are still completely screwed up. Base rate at 4.5%, FSCS protected bonds paying 5% for 5 years. Tesco corporate bonds with 6 years to go paying around 4.95%. And if I take the view that Tesco bonds rates are simply just wrong due to QE then the price of everything else is still just wrong.

cc2014
30/5/2023
11:19
I take the opposite view. Inflation was entirely the result of pandemic savings meeting an energy and food price squeeze. But those one off pressures are over. inflation only becomes entrenched when it is fuelled by wage rises and raising interest rates, in the face of a tight labour market, does that. What will someone do when their mortgage rises by £100 a month? Cut back on (non existent) discretionary spending or ask for a pay rise? Unless we have high unemployment raising rates will just prolong inflation imo
donald pond
30/5/2023
11:05
Lynne Truss, @stewart64? Eats, Shoots and Leaves? ;)

But yes, "transitory" was notable b*llocks as said by many at the time. Sure, cost-push is difficult to counter, but the BoE have done themselves no favours whatsoever. Plenty of us, from Private Eye downwards, predicted "Ollie" Bailey would be naff.

Two even went for Unchanged last time.

I don't see 6% - or even 5.5% per the market - but possibly worse is how long we'll be stuck at eg 5%, thanks to the BoE's loss of credibility. It was cost-push, now it's something nearer wage-price.

spectoacc
30/5/2023
11:03
I agree hindsight but GCP does have good protection against credit risk. The investments are generally loans secured against cash flows that are partially government backed and often have inflation protection. Some of the counterparties, such as NHS trusts in the original PFI assets, have government guarantees. It's hard to imagine wind farms or solar providers going bust and loan repayments have priority. It's not as if GCP is lending to companies: it lends to individual ring fenced projects and generally has a right to step in if needed. The sister fund GABI is more exposed to counterparty risk in the normal sense
donald pond
30/5/2023
10:56
I've really had to recalibrate my opinion of where GCP and other Bond proxies should be in the last few days following on from the realisation that Core inflation has become dangerously entrenched. It hasn't helped that I have lost complete faith in the MPC. Had the Governor behaved and not continued his super optimistic dovish commentary over the last Winter, Markets might have some belief in where we are headed. But we will now have to pay a premium for his folly, maybe rates will need to hit 6% to restore confidence. If only they had all been like Catherine Mann who ploughed a lonely furrow, to deaf ears from the rest.

Meanwhile the discount on GCP is narrowing rapidly even as it falls. Investec offers 5.45% fully FSA guaranteed against 8.45% here. Yes 3% is a generous uplift for assets that are probably safe, but we are going much higher niw we have to pay for the Governor's folly.Not that the leftist media ( the BBC in particular) will blame him, Lynne Truss' fault innit, even if she only did 1% of the damage.

stewart64
30/5/2023
09:07
"In general however it is difficult to dig that deep into the underlying assets"

Exactly donanld pond, why wearing my income pot glasses think these need to be at a decent discount now the outlook for credit risk is negative rather than positive
The managers say lot is senior debt but without knowing cover its a bit meaningless

hindsight
29/5/2023
16:50
Tbh hindsight you don't learn that much from those. They are intermediary accounts from a company that lends on behalf of GCP but it's only one of a few intermediaries. Also, the biomass projects in default may turn out to be the ones recently refinanced at a profit. In general however it is difficult to dig that deep into the underlying assets
donald pond
29/5/2023
14:52
Done bit more digging, seems maybe some loan issues even back in 2022

Page 2 section 2.3 Going Concern



Clearly this deserves a discount, but cant decide what

hindsight
26/5/2023
18:33
Followed for a while here but no position, was always concerned when tide turns offshores get hit the most. Seems thats priced in now
Using 81.2p redemption 112.24 yield 7% 10 years, get YTM of 11.7% ?

hindsight
26/5/2023
17:13
Ha ha RNS'd the same time I posted - good.

Averaged a few today, seller still very much in evidence tho. GCP not alone with that.

spectoacc
26/5/2023
16:46
GCP Infra today announces that pursuant to the general authority granted by shareholders of the Company at the annual general meeting on 15 February 2023 to make market purchases of its own ordinary shares, it repurchased 250,000 ordinary shares at a weighted average price of 82.20 pence per share, to be held in treasury, on 26 May 2023
spoole5
26/5/2023
16:28
Nowhere near having used the £15m - by my calc? First day without one yesterday.
spectoacc
26/5/2023
16:25
Wonder why they've stopped buying back
spoole5
26/5/2023
09:33
I know Phil Kent well and he is very conscientious. The recent news on refinancing and locking in power prices was very positive. Part of the problem may be that many of the institutions invested here are income funds and so they are getting redemptions due to the risk free return elsewhere. But there is clear value here for the patient
donald pond
26/5/2023
09:18
I don't think you can lay any of this apparent undervaluation at the door of current management. They are the victims of outside forces (an inflation shock), you can safely lock cash at 5% now with an FSA guarantee and base rates look headed for 5.5%. I'm sure it's overdone, I did sell out prior to ex dividend as my faith in Cenral Bankers plummeted to an all time low. Now it's dawned on most investors that the BOE has been run by a bunch of imbeciles these last three years.
stewart64
26/5/2023
08:56
The yield is now 8.5%, discount over 25%, and there is no reason to think there is any problem at underlying asset level. Gravis seem to have problems with GABI and with Phil Kent running both I think he is spread too thin. Orix took a sizeable stake in Gravis a couple of years ago and are sending in support but it can't come soon enough.
donald pond
25/5/2023
16:43
This is the Market reaction I expected following the BOE inflation report that came out on ex dividend day ( the price then was 90p) I mistakenly ascribed the small drop to that report. The amazing thing is Bond proxies were unmoved even though the writing was on the wall and I said as much on that day. Thw report was sugared coated by BOE as always and misled the Market, nobody in their wildest dreams could have guessed then that Core inflation was going to come in at a 6.8% shocker a week later. Paraphrasing the Ripper regarding wall writings....Bailey is the man that will not be blamed for nothing
stewart64
25/5/2023
15:40
No point lending anymore with the shares on a 25% discount, may as well use the capital to buy back.
spoole5
25/5/2023
09:52
Yep; high end resi can be done by smaller house builders/and individuals but increasingly no one can compete with the volume house builders - they can build c£20 cheaper than anyone else - which on a £300 psf end value is massive Of course the cost of that is identikit housing estates across the country
williamcooper104
25/5/2023
09:41
Guess it certainly is for RPI, but not for recent/current inflation. Also interesting inflation generally low when house prices are rampant, and housing lower when inflation rampant. But that's interest rates of course.

On a side note, it's very difficult to build cheaply now, irrespective of land cost - probably why only the volume housebuilders are able to do it successfully. Materials/skilled labour costs are through the roof (no pun intended).

spectoacc
Chat Pages: Latest  25  24  23  22  21  20  19  18  17  16  15  14  Older

Your Recent History