Enquest Share Discussion Threads

[letsmakesome] 15/7/2019 00:50

https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/tropical-storm-barry-cuts-73-of-us-offshore-oil-production-federal-agency-says

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 21:34

No takers for post 10030?

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 21:28

jotoI said I still held to discodobber earlier today.I can confirm I hold less than you and Amjad.

[jotoha2] 13/7/2019 21:20

Stan can I remind you that you have indeed stated that you are up to your eyeballs in stock , and that you bought these at 17p , either confirm to settle the matter , or we can all see that it is all fiction , if that is the case then do not worry , there are lots of agencies that can help.

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 21:06

So you will not provide any reason for bullish other than the director buying, but will attack me for giving ten reasonable negative reasons?But if I say a number of shares that I (claim) to own then will prove I am long?Did you really say that, just I do not think I have ever heard anything quite so ridiculous (no offence deuchbag and gaslighter) ?

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 21:03

Caught out how, forgetting I called it a dog, whilst continually moaning about depletion, debt etc?

[jotoha2] 13/7/2019 20:57

Stan , you have been caught out , the only way to redeem yourself is to come clean and confirm exactly how many shares you hold in ENQ , if you say no , then we can only assume that it is all fiction .

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 20:56

You had umpteen opportunities to explain enq is not a dog.58p to 22p, with brent going from 54 to 67Two rights issuesSo this is good performance?

[discodave4] 13/7/2019 20:51

You are nearly 30% up in 3 months or so (allegedly) and you call your investment a dog, unbelievable.Sorry but IMO you don't hold here, nothing you have posted supports that, either you are a fantasist that simply enjoys winding people up and slagging them off or you are short and simply enjoy winding people up and slagging them off.Filtered

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 20:51

Of course not six hours ago I pointed out anyone not throwing glib targets around gets accused of being short.Thank you for making my point better than I could.

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 20:49

I see you are still talking characterisations and not the substance of the brent/sp comparison, which of course you have no answer for.

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 20:47

I like to call people out as you have done to me. If that is the best anyone can come up with, I have nothing to worry about.All posts made from memory and are truthful and honest, if you do not want to believe that, fair enough thats up to you.

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 20:43

Ok, I forgot I characterised in such terms. Given the share price was 18p last week with 64$ brent and anyone could buy as much as they wanted on the back of full speed kraken and relentless director buying, how would you characterise it?

[discodave4] 13/7/2019 20:33

Or how about this one:"Brent $67, Enq intraday 21pWoof woof."You are short here or just like to wind people up and have no position.

[discodave4] 13/7/2019 20:31

Or this one:"It is a very risky dog, to say otherwise is plain stupid"

[discodave4] 13/7/2019 20:30

Are you for real, how about this one:"Now being up to my eyeballs in enq, I am stuck looking forward to eating your hat when this dog gets to 60p"

[seangwhite] 13/7/2019 19:46

I would be happy with 30p by September and hope for all holders it gets there sooner!

[onjohn] 13/7/2019 19:36

really I believe this is Worth 45p

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 19:20

Joto

I posted my purchases at the time, 17.31 which iirc was the day after the 15p low.

Just how many times can you get facts wrong?

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 19:18

JotoYou dont have to like a company to be long. You just have to think the shares are going up. I said that in the thread of posts you claim to have trolled.I didnt say I was an investment guru, I said I had made a correct call and highlighted the poor calls of people who think they are experts - gaslighter and deuchbag

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 19:15

DDWhen did I say it was a dog?

[jotoha2] 13/7/2019 18:40

DD if you go back and check his comments around march 2019 when the share price was around 16p , he never once was positive about the company , but was very negative , so he slates the company and at the same time buys at it's lowest point , guru or what , the jury is out on that one.

[discodave4] 13/7/2019 18:14

Why would you call your investment a dog?, strange, if you think it is then why are you holding.This is high risk due their debt but it is undervalued when compared to its peers and do see 60p is possible in a couple of years........but as ever it depends on poo.What do you think it's worth?Cheers

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 14:48

JotoI dont imply anything. I tell it how I see it, even if that goes against my book.You can assume anything you like, but given you assume enq will be 60p by december we can draw very definitive conclusions about your deductive logic ability.After getting out of enq at 24, I posted very negatively about its prospects (recall field issues), everyone but andy argued this very strongly. Gaslighter and deuchebag were shown as the morons I accused them of being. The share dropped to 15p, I got back in at the low 17s and have been long since. Hope that clears things up for you.

[stansmith3] 13/7/2019 14:40

DDThanks, you too.Currently, have huge holding.I do not think I am negative, just realistic - this is very risky and potentially lucrative. The less experienced investors on this board have yet to learn that these two characteristics are linked.You only need read the accounts to see the mire enquest is in.Why dont you ask people who throw numbers around like 60p by december how they calculate that? What needs to happen to get there? What could get in the way of that?The bulls are great at calling people negative when they cite very good reasons - to be cautious and measured - but they accuse them of being short and deramping. Show the bull case, with numbers, the bear case is obvious we have been living it for four years.