We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crestchic Plc | LSE:LOAD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0SPFW38 | ORD 10P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 399.00 | GBX |
Crestchic (LOAD) Share Charts1 Year Crestchic Chart |
|
1 Month Crestchic Chart |
Intraday Crestchic Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
21/10/2023 | 08:04 | Crestchic Plc formerly NBI | 197 |
24/7/2001 | 07:38 | COMPANY FREELOADERS - the official thread. | 4 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 26/2/2023 11:02 by zho Countryman5,I think I first read about LOAD in one of Simon Thompson's pieces, and he recently recommended a not dissimilar business, Ashtead Technology, a fast-growing offshoot of Ashtead, which rents out equipment to support installation and decommissioning of offshore energy infrastructure, both wind turbines, and oil and gas. Having touched 355p after an upbeat TU in mid-January, the shares pulled back following a placing of 19% of the Company at 310p by the previous private equity owners. 2022 revenues are now expected increase by 30%, and upgraded forecasts for 2023 put the Company on a PE of roughly 12.8p (at 302p), with Simon T reckoning that “the earnings upgrade cycle has further to run”. |
Posted at 07/2/2023 09:39 by alter ego sold out this morning for 399.09p sorry to lose LOAD. Rotork have got a good deal. |
Posted at 01/2/2023 09:46 by whittler100 Dont' get too carried away by Samson; the way they work is to make a sure profit albeit a tiny one, from the purchase price to the final payout price post-takeover. |
Posted at 23/12/2022 11:15 by zho Paul Hill notes that a Cayman Islands hedge fund has taken nearly 6% of LOAD and sees the outside chance of a counter bid, perhaps from Ashtead or Schneider Electric:from 19:45 |
Posted at 10/12/2022 16:18 by smithie6 Dozey3"Age of anyone irrelevant; directors act for all shareholders." good luck on that one !! on AIM one can not expect "dirs to act for all shareholders" AIM, it is often like the wild west. Globo, Cupid.....many cases of dodgy dirs. recently the previous MD of Morse broke the regs. he sold his shares. he did not report it. he then revealed shocking co. news & the share price imploded. Will the system punish him ? I'm not holding my breath, the FCA is famous as lazy & incompetent, for decades. ------- Mr Harris can of course vote how he wants for his shares. The RNS says he has voted to accepted the offer. Does he have the option to change & hop to accept any higher offer ?. I don't know, but it would be normal. You holders might get a higher offer(s), who knows. & if less than 75% of the existing shares vote yes then the offer is rejected. |
Posted at 10/12/2022 15:59 by smithie6 btw£33 million raised via share issues £10 million total losses (!!) selling for £110-120 million is perhaps a good result. at least the investors that put the £33 million to subscribe for shares will "on average" be seeing a good return. (some share issues were done at >£4 .....so those subscribers will be booking a loss on those specific shares) ---- the previous MD lost a lot of money if his options were deleted when he retired since he had about 1 million of 'em. at £4/share that would have given him a big payment. ---- Does the FD deserve a payment of about ~£1.2 million due to this takeover due to his options ? By being the FD what did he do to deserve that ??!! or just riding on the back of the workers doing loadbanks ?? (& imo he screwed up on the terms for the loan from Hardwood, the co. took on very bad conditions imo, due to lack of experience or was the co. unable to get better terms anywhere else ??) |
Posted at 23/11/2022 12:01 by whittler100 Today’s move up in the LOAD share price may well have been prompted in part by a very positive site visit report published in Stockopedia in the investor comments section of SCVR. Very positive article and worth a read for any current/potential holders. |
Posted at 23/11/2022 09:38 by carcosa am guessing recent share price strength is on the back of this Just one of several outlets marketing "The Load Bank Market research report". Experience with these types of reports is that its a general round up of publically available resources to create a report to generate income for the marketing company. i.e. usually a puff piece dressed up to look something more than it is. The headline CAGR appear to me as missing the mark by a wide margin. |
Posted at 26/8/2022 06:25 by mrnumpty On page 23 , thé Questor column in today’s ( Friday’s ) Questor Telegraph has a shortish article about Crestchic ( “ These Aim companies have the financial strength to overcome rampant rate rises “ - the other two companies mentioned are Totally and Michelmersh ) . Questor is somewhat cautious about Crestchic’s exposure to the energy market but the column is encouraged by the “ high levels of demand from rising levels of data centre activity “ . The article concludes “ Due to an uncertain outlook for the oil and gas sector , we are not expecting its 38% share price surge over the past month to be repeated soon . But it nevertheless remains a long-term hold following a 77% share price gain since being added [ to Questor ] in April 2019 “ . |
Posted at 24/8/2022 15:23 by zho Paul Hill continues to bang the drum for LOAD:My current fair value for loadbank expert @Crestchic_UK is 330p/share vs 285p today. However for 2023, I estimate #LOAD should generate approx £12m of EBITDA - which on a 10x multiple, would produce a theoretical 12M Target Price of 400p. Plenty of upside still to go. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions