Conygar Investment Share Chat (CIC)

Share Name	Share Symbol	Market	Type	Share ISIN	Share Description
Conygar Investment Company	LSE:CIC	London	Ordinary Share	GB0033698720	ORD 5P

	Price Change	% Change	Share Price	Bid Price	Offer Price	High Price	Low Price	Open Price	Shares Traded	Last Trade
	+0.00p	+0.00%	173.50p	172.00p	175.00p	173.50p	173.00p	173.50p	11,000	14:00:25

Industry Sector	Turnover (m)	Profit (m)	EPS - Basic	PE Ratio	Market Cap (m)
Real Estate Investment & Services	9.4	-4.7	-6.9	-	122.91

Conygar Investment Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1326 to 1346 of 1350 messages

Chat Pages: 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 Older

Date	Subject	Author	Discuss
06/6/2017 22:42	700 houses in Haverfordwest!!??....its ridiculous.	lochgarman	Read Full Thread Reply
05/6/2017 17:33	I see the Western Telegraph have posted that CIC have pulled out of the Retail and Cinema side of the Slade Development at Haverfordwest. The plan for the 700 plus houses is to continue...subject to a buyer to develop and build them.	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
27/5/2017 17:43	I see horizon has decided not to build the worker accommodation on the Rhosgoch site but on the site at Wylfa. 46mill isnt a lot of money in CIC's piggy bank to pay for all the development work...ie 40mill to build the development platform at Fishguard..and with EU money about to dry up...how do you see the future for Conygar?	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
30/4/2017 17:19	CIC still has a charge against them...anyone any idea what this relates to?	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
13/3/2017 13:02	First they need to get the licence from NRW to dredge. Secondly they need another licence re the archaeology which will be posted as a Public Notice and 6 week consultation process shortly. Thirdly they will need a HRO Harbour Revision Order which they have not yet applied for. They cant apply for a HRO if they havent got a Marina Operator and if they are serious about a Marina and not just a housing estate then they need a HRO. They have asked NRW to leave the Marine Licence in place at Pembroke Dock so that they can sell it off as a going concern. So before they can build anything or put a spade in the ground they need the Marine Licence to dredge and the Marine Licence yet to be applied for relating to the preservation in situ of the wrecks...so we are not exactly about to start work in the immediate future. Back to the wonderful UK and internet access. Comments welcome	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
03/3/2017 21:40	yes..its positive	lochgarman	Read Full Thread Reply
28/2/2017 18:49	Aren't we due some news on the Holyhead project this week, which should also be positive?	strathroyal	Read Full Thread Reply
28/2/2017 17:28	well ppl u are quite right...this is what happens when u dont read the fine print...the joys of being somewhere with limited internet access....I stand corrected...totally!!...well, no idea what to make of it...will be interested to see what happens with Regional REIT limited....Question is I suppose is.... Will they invest the money back into the company and develop their Wales projects out or what?. They seem to have only been interested in paying themselves healthy salaries and NOT paying out their shareholders...so...wait n see.	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
25/2/2017 15:39	What do you mean NO Debts...they have a net debt of 27 million	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
25/2/2017 15:38	Good Lord no...have u not been watching Suits...lol. I am just crooked	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
24/2/2017 14:39	FWIW revised plans for Fishguard Marina were submitted jointly by Conygar and Stena in January, which has been well received locally. Perhaps this exercise in clearing the decks will enable the project to proceed. In the meantime they have abandoned the parallel plan for the marina at Pembroke Dock.Http://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/14217427.Revised_plans_submitted_for_Fishguard_marina/	shavian	Read Full Thread Reply
24/2/2017 07:45	Looking positive: credible management team (reflected in NAV discount) portfolio fit, great liquidity. Let's see how the deal details turn out...Sky?	void concept	Read Full Thread Reply
24/2/2017 06:42	Lots to be grateful for with this deal. Credible management team (reflected in the premium on their NAV) Plus greater liquidity. Great portfolio fit. Terms look reasonable. Let's see where the deal detail ends up but hopeful. Sky??	void concept	Read Full Thread Reply
23/2/2017 16:55	Great news! The big money is in their development plans... finaly they have got their priorities right and with no debt can start developing.	greg the grinch	Read Full Thread Reply
23/2/2017 12:25	Deal with RGL looks very good albeit there is actually a slight loss on disposal as RGL shares trade 3% or so below NAV but that seems very acceptable as the deal effectively gives Conygar a fresh start. Certainly the market seems to like it.	strathroyal	Read Full Thread Reply
23/2/2017 10:35	Completely wrong again, crooked. There is a fundamental difference between requirements to report market sensitive info through the RNS route, which is a condition of listing, and the Companies Act requirement to register with Co Hse the purchases of own shares. Are you really a lawyer? It's you who's lax, not Conygar.	ursus	Read Full Thread Reply
22/2/2017 18:04	I stand corrected. Why back date it and put it up now...where it been since then. Along with all the the RNS 's they have not put up on Company House Website...seems a bit lax to me.	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
21/2/2017 13:34	The explanation is not difficult to find if you bother to read the document filed at Co Hse on 8 Feb. The repurchases took place in Oct and Nov 2016. And if you bother yourself even more, and look at RNS's published then, you will see that all those repurchases were promptly notified to the market. Is yr post an indication of the care with which you comment generally on Conygar?	ursus	Read Full Thread Reply
21/2/2017 13:16	https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04907617/filing-history I see another repurchase of shares...but this only appears so it would seem ...may be wrong on company house beta website...seems to have been missed off the recent activity...I see there are great gaps on company house website too...perhaps they are trying to comply with statutory RNS by hiding it...lol.	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
28/12/2016 15:45	Maybe the new Nottingham investment represents the money they are no longer going to spend in Wales.	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply
20/12/2016 10:53	which good aquisition lol. but yes u sum it all up well. Seasons Greetings.	crooked lawyer	Read Full Thread Reply

Chat Pages: 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 Older