Cloudtag Share Discussion Threads

[ionlypostafterbbms] 06/4/2017 11:28

Maybe grannysnuffs could be The People's rep here.

After all he is qualified; he has a vested interest, has lost a huge sum, has plenty of spare time & is a very savvy & experienced AIM trader.

[grannysnuffs] 06/4/2017 11:16

bacon muncher and his student paid posters, PMSL

[wshak] 06/4/2017 11:10

A sign of things to come may be that CTAG haven't made their annual accounts publicly available. That would suggest that they want a low vote turnout.

[wshak] 06/4/2017 11:07

IOnlyPostAfterBBMs,I think there is a fine balancing act for Amit here. Does he go for more wonga from private investors, potentially giving them enough votes to get someone on the board to have a look at where the money has disappeared to, or does he dilute them away now?I'm puzzled why CTAG shareholders think other resolutions to keep existing directors are okay, given what has gone on? I'd have thought the first thing to do would be to get new board members involved?If CTAG are giving the SG short shrift, I'd hazard a guess that they are going for the route of diluting people's interests away and quietly shutting down. If CTAG do engage on a SERIOUS basis, they are probably going for a last hurrah.

[ionlypostafterbbms] 06/4/2017 10:56

These two LSE posters get it. Incidentally, these two posts have generated ZERO response from the mugs.

Shaungreen47
Today 06:35

Speaking of Brokernan, one thing before I go.

There will be at least one influential person within the group who will be working on behalf of the BOD. That is for certain.


the_freedman
Today 07:04

Brokerman did join LSE after the suspension ;)

You might not be able to say or want to but has any of the chief rampers joined the SG?

[grannysnuffs] 06/4/2017 10:49

i think its time to track u down and put one across ur cheek, u deserve a little payback pal

[andy] 06/4/2017 10:45

loglorry1
6 Apr '17 - 07:24 - 62 of 66 0 1 (premium)

"The SAG say they have experienced people running it"

Their definition of "experienced" probably varies to ours, they need a bear onboard with some market knowledge IMO.


"I think Amit will have them for breakfast."

Sadly so do I unless the SAG wise up quickly.

[dudishes] 06/4/2017 07:28

G'day Andy, knew I could find you here.

I received a message from Tom W (I did back him on a court case, which he won), he sent me a very nice message, prior to packin up! Msgs have flowed since, and maybe he will continue.

He has covered the fact that he was rubbish on the investment front, but very clever at reading accounts, not for Evil, no, for the interested investor.

If punters chose to take his advice, suggest that many would have gained by closing, or shorting.

Evil is a friend of mine (think he backs up this statement, his wife does)!

Whatever Tom does, its been damn good fun!

[loglorry1] 06/4/2017 07:24

The SAG say they have experienced people running it but don't seem to even grasp properly what the 0.1p nominal value means. They seem to think this is the value that sets m/c whereby new money goes in. I think Amit will have them for breakfast.

[andy] 06/4/2017 06:42

Nod,

Good question, I doubt anyone knows the answer for sure.

The NEX does not normally have liquidity, but if CTAG list there it might have, so the answer may be it depends on if there is suffcient liquidity.

[andy] 06/4/2017 06:37

OK I ahave read the resolutions and #5 is about the disolution of pre emption rights to issue arund £500,000 worth of shares via various methods.


The SAG are "talking to some exerienced investors" without naming them, nor their "experience"!

This does not bode well, IMO.

I agree, they need a cynic like Wshak who can tell them like it is, but sadly four raging bulls are more likely.

Rince and repeat coming unlss SAG up their game.........

[nod] 06/4/2017 00:00

Apology if this was discussed on the old thread:If CTAG is now trading on NEX what happens to the L1 Capital agreement? Can L1 continue? Or, is that the end of L1 funding.

[henchard] 05/4/2017 23:39

WShak,

Indeed, I don't think I've seen anything like it before on this scale. Amit has really raised the bar on what can be achieved with a stock promotion. I think the continued enthusiasm to put money into the company may be down to subtle hints he's given his loyal LTHs that his secret masterplan all along is to make a trade sale for hundreds of millions or even billions in 2017. He's done it before you know, according to his self-penned CV.

[wshak] 05/4/2017 23:20

Henchard,I'd do it, if asked.My first rule would be, under no circumstances, give any of these f@&kers any more money.I don't think that kind of consultancy will go down too well. People are falling over themselves on LSE to argue that they should be given first right of refusal to provide money - and they want it to be at a suitably high level.You couldn't make it up.

[ionlypostafterbbms] 05/4/2017 22:56

Funny and true.

[henchard] 05/4/2017 22:51

Probably the best thing the SAG could do would be to hire a knowledgeable bear as a consultant. I'd nominate WShak for the gig but I think the SAG grassroots would veto it and put forward their own candidate - maybe David Greece or grannysnuffs.

[henchard] 05/4/2017 22:25

Apparently the SAG 'leaders' have sent an email out to members tonight. Judging by a quote from the email on LSE, the SAG leaders have no understanding of nominal share value and the authorities being sought by CTAG in resolution 5.

[andy] 05/4/2017 22:06

I have been told SAG now have 800 members and over 45% of the equity.

They are recommending voting "yes" to resolutions 1 - 4, and "no" to resolution 5, which I would imagine everyone agrees with.