Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

[pug151] 19/5/2016 11:04

Bad Robot
19 May'16 - 10:38 - 4381 of 4386 0 1 (Filtered)

Bad Robot
19 May'16 - 10:42 - 4382 of 4386 0 1 (Filtered)

Bad Robot
19 May'16 - 10:44 - 4383 of 4386 0 1 (Filtered)

Bad Robot
19 May'16 - 10:57 - 4384 of 4386 0 1 (Filtered)

[daddy warbucks] 19/5/2016 11:00

Does anyone know a good hacker. Would love to expose the details of all these people.

[bad robot] 19/5/2016 10:57

Courtesy of HW
heat wave 19 May'16 - 10:54 - 27 of 27 0 0

Look at the sells !!!!!!!!

[bad robot] 19/5/2016 10:44

Courtesy of HW.

heat wave 19 May'16 - 10:43 - 26 of 26 0 0



Very grim today, selling, delaying reporting of sells

[bad robot] 19/5/2016 09:51

50k delayed reporting sell from yesterday.
Why are they delaying these reporting? Because if they goal is to keep this at £26m artificially, one would not show punters that people are selling in the background, when the objecting is to con them in buying at 70X more than it’s worth.

Punters basically loading up on a underdog at odds that’s usually for favourite.

[bad robot] 19/5/2016 08:53

The close group ramping inbreeders would never tell you about account, net assets of $501k yet mcap of £26m, BR did.

Now you should understand the mindset of these scamsters. My opinion be careful by what the clearly disingenuous people post. Check IT many failed P&D, all the fakes news, rumours in the last 7-8 years


IN BR WE TRUST

[bad robot] 19/5/2016 08:41

Just look at the sells lining up like little ducks. Some common sense finally
Net assets of $501k and certainly a lot less now, and punters paying 70X-80X more for a chance to gamble.

Company with net asset of $501k cannot be valued at £26m. Red alert.
Clearly extortion by the MM. Of course if one wants to speculate on a dog you do not pay 70x time more than it's worth. Only Donuts do this.

Yes I am bargain hunter too, but there’s no way I will allow MMS to extortionate me. Who are they trying to kid? There are people who are smarter than their entire gang in their firm combined

[pug151] 19/5/2016 08:25

Just filter it.

[theorb] 19/5/2016 07:43

No Bad Robot, lingering on the future!

[bad robot] 19/5/2016 07:22

GM
When they had the right was CHL valued at $1.3bn? And now they do own the rights now and hence net asset value is $501k.

Yes I think you are the wrong thread, you avatar states GCM

Right does not mean they owned the resources.

Just because some loons in CHL say it’s $1.3bn compensation does not mean it’s valid.

So the narrative for buying is to at 70X-80X Net asset based on some right which been taken away for years. Lingering on the past.

[mrshaungcm] 18/5/2016 21:34

They did have the right to mine a fair wak of coal a while ago - or am i posting on the wrong board

[bad robot] 18/5/2016 21:13

Anyone can explain to me as per half year statement, how can a $501k net asset translate to £26m?

When it's too good to be true then it's not true.

[jaf1948] 18/5/2016 20:40

neo, I did weeks ago. But it still fills the screen !

[neo26] 18/5/2016 20:35

Jaf

Just filter the idiot, desperate day trader...

[bad robot] 18/5/2016 19:59

For example if some tramp, stops you on the highstreet asking for 50 squids, would you give it to him/her? Most will just say phock off.

So why are punters willing to throw their hard earned money chasing puffs ramped by scamsters operating anonymously?


Basic mathematics how can $501K of net asset translate to £26m market capitalisation? Does this company prints its own money?

[bad robot] 18/5/2016 19:55

Hi Tivoli

I am saying this.
If Net asset is $501K it should be priced according, then it will be of speculative nature.

But punters paying 70X more for something bust (net assets of $501K), that's extortion by the market maker. It's basically palming a dud share to gamblers allowing bigger shareholders to exit.

90% of companies trading on AIM trade at discount between -50% -70% to NAV, but this one is trading at a premium of 7000%-8000%.

Shareholder equity means exactly what’s it worth at the present time

[jaf1948] 18/5/2016 19:49

What is happening here is exactly what happened on the OXS board towards the end of the arbitration.Just as nature abhors a vacuum, a BB about a company like CHL is either going to fill up with meaningless conjecture (since no one knows anything more about what is going to happen than anyone else) or be taken over by mindless idiots who have nothing better to do with their lives.Debbie is trying her best but alas I feel that won't be enough.

[bad robot] 18/5/2016 19:48

A new thread, where everyone gets to post, fair game, I will honour the request. All I interested to discuss is about CHL.

Why a company with net asset of $501k in Dec 2015, is valued at £26m?

No revenues, no capital, basically nothing? Any adjudicator can easily see, this is an invalid claim. How much profit they made before the issues?
Look at coal prices, this company would have folded anyway.

[tivoliworldgaming] 18/5/2016 19:43

BR,
That is like saying that if Churchill win the case then the share price will still be the same price.

[bad robot] 18/5/2016 18:24

From yearly account (RNS) Net asset is $501k, there's no point for such kind of calculation, punters are paying 70X more than it's worth.

Net asset $501k, mcap 25m

Usually it's the other way around punters buying cheap for a future reward not here.