Cap-xx Share Discussion Threads

[monkeywench1] 08/12/2016 07:50

This will drift until further news.

[vauch] 08/12/2016 07:19

if you look at any product the fist units will cost a lot as are near hand built.
on production run this sort of saving should be expected the question is the profit the company make on each one still as near as it can be the same or has it also been reduced by 50%

[cocker] 08/12/2016 05:31

I have just again re-read yesterday's rns & 2nd time around it actually sounds better. Massive savings for potential customers, price reduction also offers new opportunities & finally in detailed talks with several clients. I guess CPX is one of those companies that just could make one of us a fortune, but beware. Possible acquisitions /capital funding, needs to be restricted, as all to often dilution of shares comes at a great cost to existing shareholders(Rhythm one ,Monitise, oxford bio to name but a few).I would guess that the next six months are perhaps the most important & like most, FIRM orders or cost saving joint ventures are needed to propel the company forward.

[monkeywench1] 07/12/2016 20:03

However I feel we will have a tickle down until there are actual orders received/JV announced.

Not a problem for LTH`s.

[monkeywench1] 07/12/2016 20:02

Yeah be great to tickle up tomorrow.

[jedad] 07/12/2016 19:50

Great volume today ,,be good to tickle up tomorrow ,, lovely seeing it all coming together 👍👍

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 10:07

Tini5, never thought you were; these holdings RNS really do need a new format, they're incredibly obscure.

[tini5] 07/12/2016 10:01

Yes, thanks for the education - didn't intend to mislead!

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 09:51

No issues Pugg1ey, post away.

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 09:49

It is massively confusing and I'm sure they like it that way. For all we know they could be currently buying what they sold through a different fund/investment branch. This unfortunately is the dirty world of stocks and shares, which is made inherently worse by us being listed on AIM.

[pugg1ey] 07/12/2016 09:48

I have posted that on LSE Darnoc. I got your name right second go:-)

[bouncingbean] 07/12/2016 09:48

Yes thanks for that - got it now

[pugg1ey] 07/12/2016 09:45

thanks Darnoc64, very confusing

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 09:39

They are different areas/departments within L&G. For example today's holding RNS is for Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM). The holdings RNS prior to this was just for L&G. And the one before that included L&G Unit Trust Managers (UTM).What today's RNS states is that LGIM have sold shares causing them to go below the 5% threshold.

[pugg1ey] 07/12/2016 09:29

buying...and at a higher price than they sold

[bouncingbean] 07/12/2016 09:25

How does that work then, the last rns from l&g says they were just over 3% now they are just under 5 % have they missed a notification?

[rayrac] 07/12/2016 09:24

Selling...

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 09:20

Sorry to say Tini5; they have been selling, gone below 5% holding.

[tini5] 07/12/2016 09:15

If I'm reading the tea leaves correctly, Legal & General Group have increased their holding from 11,164,549 to 14,089,549 shares. Not a huge amount of money granted but better buying than selling.

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 08:18

Very true.

[pugg1ey] 07/12/2016 08:05

but when the price is right, someone will start to pay fees to get exclusive testing imo

[darnoc64] 07/12/2016 07:59

Pugg1eye, I don't have a profitable trade, I have a profitable investment - been here for two years. The point you make is fair, but the concern for me is that these new units, which have different components and construction, will now have to undergo further trials by potential buyers. During which time more R&D will take place and so the cycle will start again.

[cocker] 07/12/2016 07:47

Early days for a world leader & although frustrating it appears that they are moving in the right direction. Lowering cost by some 50% can only open more doors for CPX. All in all a useful rns with a hint of what is to come.