We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cadogan Energy Solutions Plc | LSE:CAD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B12WC938 | ORD 3P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.25 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 08:00:14 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drilling Oil And Gas Wells | 8.47M | -1.56M | -0.0064 | -3.52 | 5.49M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/3/2021 23:02 | There are some Ukranian articles about court challenge between Astrogas llc, Geonadra and Naftogazexpluatatsiy I don't understand one thing. Astrogas llc is a subsidiary of Cadogan Petroleum plc but journalists refers 'Astrogaz LLC from the orbit of Nikolai Zlochevsky (Burisma Group)'. | brumbrum79 | |
10/3/2021 22:56 | Natural Gas Production Favorites Swapped Places On February 23, the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the Kiev District Administrative Court dated October 6, 2020, thereby completely redistributing the roles between the key disputants of the process, Astrogaz LLC from the orbit of Nikolai Zlochevsky and Naftogazexpluatatsiy In the photo - Nikolay Zlochevsky This fight was started by the side of the founder of the Burisma group. The lawsuit, filed back in the summer of 2019, contained claims against the State Service of Geology and Subsoil in terms of inaction to issue a special permit for the use of subsoil. We are talking about a license for the commercial development of the Pirkovskoye oil and gas condensate field (Poltava region). Astrogaz argued that the company had submitted the package of documents allowing it to apply for out-of-competition obtaining a special permit to the State Geological Survey in October 2018, but did not receive a response until a direct appeal to the court, that is, in the fall of 2020. Why is this firm better than others, which gives it a reason to expect to receive a license without a competition? Mostly the background. Since 2007, Astrogaz has had a special permit for the use of subsoil in the Pirkovskoye field. Since that time, the company has invested decently in "its" site, having carried out its geological study, including pilot development, as a result of which the so-called "approbation of reserves" was carried out. This very approbation, according to the rules that existed several years ago, was a sufficient basis for the out-of-competition issuance of a special permit. Just for a new special permit for the use of subsoil under a simplified procedure (without an auction), Astrogaz began to apply for a few years ago, when the company's “old” license was about to expire. The Gosgeonedra did not feel this petition, explaining their refusal by the fact that the licensee did not fulfill the work program, which is an integral part of the license, which led the parties to the courtroom. In addition to a philosophical complaint about the passivity of the geological department, the lawsuit of Nikolai Zlochevsky's side also contained a specific mundane part: to oblige Roman Opimakh's department to issue a special permit. As OLIGARCH reported, the District Administrative Court satisfied the application, however, it did so in such a way that neither side was satisfied with the decision. It said that the inactivity of the Gosgeonedr could indeed be qualified as unlawful, but at the same time there was no question of any obligation on the part of the state structure to issue a special permit to Astrogaz. The first instance court limited itself to a cautionary conclusion about the need to consider the applicant's application. For Astrogaz LLC, this meant that the company had to return to the standby mode again, which in the case of licensing activities in the field of subsoil use could last for years. For OOO Naftogazexpluatatsiy "The Astrogaz company asks the court of appeal to cancel the decision of the court of first instance and adopt a new ruling, which satisfies the administrative claim in full," - said in a statement by the lawyers of the side of Nikolai Zlochevsky. In the photo - Rinat Akhmetov "The company" Naftogazexpluatatsiy From the background of this conflict, it is clear that initially the spark ran between Astrogaz and Gosgeonedra (and not Astrogaz and Naftogazexpluatatsiy But where is Rinat Akhmetov's company here? The lawyers of the richest Ukrainian answered this question quite intelligibly. “Claims filed by Astrogaz LLC relate to the granting of the right to use the subsoil of the Pirkovskoye oil and gas condensate field for the purpose of geological exploration, which is located within the Pirkovskaya area. Meanwhile, by the order of the Cabinet of Ministers dated July 5, 2019 No. 507-r "On determining the winners of tenders for concluding agreements on the sharing of hydrocarbons," OOO Neftegazexpluatatsiy More than a year has passed since that moment, which showed that Neftegazexpluatatsiy Zinkovsky, whose gas resources are estimated at 3.8 billion cubic meters. And this is largely due to the conflict with Astrogaz LLC. But is Rinat Akhmetov's team approaching its goal now, when the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal canceled the above-mentioned decision of the Kiev District Administrative Court last year? Yes, it’s true, it can still change. Zlochevsky's team has the right to prove their case in the Supreme Court, whose decision today is absolutely unpredictable. | brumbrum79 | |
10/3/2021 22:50 | АХМ 05.03.2021 Фав 23 фев На фот Эту В «Асm |