We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cadogan Energy Solutions Plc | LSE:CAD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B12WC938 | ORD 3P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.25 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 30,000 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drilling Oil And Gas Wells | 8.47M | -1.56M | -0.0064 | -3.52 | 5.49M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
29/4/2021 12:23 | Should get news shortly. Price action not looking good imho. | targatarga | |
22/4/2021 11:28 | Gas prices will go through the roof. Perhaps oil too. | itsriskythat | |
22/4/2021 11:06 | Nice buy risky.... How do you feel about the armour build up on the border! | targatarga | |
22/4/2021 11:01 | My buy this morning of 150,000 shares at 4.555p is not showing yet | itsriskythat | |
20/4/2021 21:05 | The other point on this licence the well was producing , when the licence was not removed was capped | thordon | |
20/4/2021 15:58 | Біт Cadogan Petroleum при Ком Усе Кол | itsriskythat | |
18/4/2021 12:07 | This is good news because the Supreme Court found no reason to deny Cadogan an appeal.So Pirkivska licence renewal should be validated when the Supreme Court judges have looked at the case papers. | itsriskythat | |
17/4/2021 19:43 | Pirkivska license - Supreme Court challenge: APPROVAL April 6, 2021 Kiev case №640 / 12569/19 administrative proceedings №К / 9901/10217/21 The Supreme Court, composed of a panel of judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation : Judge-Rapporteur - Stetsenko SG, Judges: Strelets TG, Tatsiy LV, having examined the cassation appeal of the Limited Liability Company "ASTROGAS" against the decision of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv from 06.10.2020 and the decision of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal from 23.02.2021 in case №640 / 12569/19 on the claim of the Limited Liability Company "ASTROGAS" to the State services of geology and subsoil of Ukraine, third parties: Limited Liability Company "Naftogazsekspluatat More informations here: hxxps://reyestr.cour | thordon | |
17/4/2021 19:22 | If you want to say a bit more about your comment "High Court at present" that would help others as well. | itsriskythat | |
17/4/2021 17:19 | In High Court at present | thordon | |
17/4/2021 12:42 | Анд This man has all the answers .. Анд | itsriskythat | |
17/4/2021 11:07 | Monastyretska development Yusenko Nadra has plans to drill four development wells outside the Blazhiv oil field into other structures on the Monastyretska licence. I can only read English so relying on the translation as here .. I now want to check on progress with the Environmental Impact Assessment here .. The conclusion of the EIA was published April 24th 2020 as document 5. Can anyone help me here with the conclusion? | itsriskythat | |
16/4/2021 08:05 | Gas trading Has the gas trading business resumed trading again this year? Last H1 2020 results showed no activity at all from trading. Was the only trading last year the sale of existing gas inventories? This trading business could be run on very few staff. Latest figures show 80 staff across the Cadogan business. Unknown how many staff are employed in gas trading. Staff costs and numbers are too high across the whole of Cadogan for a business with revenues just from oil sales and services. Any ideas or comments? | itsriskythat | |
11/4/2021 19:55 | Yes, Thordon. We will see what happens. The court challenge for Pirkviska license is not over, Astrogaz LLC/Cadogan have another chance. | brumbrum79 | |
11/4/2021 19:25 | Thanks Brumbrum but not quite over yet as always a clause Claim from the District Administrative Court of Kyiv case №640 / 12569/19 on the claim of Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" to the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine, third parties: Limited Liability Company "Naftogazsekspluatat Set a deadline for filing a response to the cassation appeal within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this decision and explain that the response is accompanied by evidence of sending (providing) copies and documents attached to it to other participants in the case. The term established by court can be prolonged at the request of the person if impossibility of performance of the corresponding procedural action in the certain term is caused by the restrictions imposed in connection with quarantine. The decision comes into force from the moment of its signing by judges, is final and is not subject to appeal. | thordon | |
11/4/2021 17:23 | Pirkivska license - Supreme Court challenge: APPROVAL April 6, 2021 Kiev case №640 / 12569/19 administrative proceedings №К / 9901/10217/21 The Supreme Court, composed of a panel of judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation : Judge-Rapporteur - Stetsenko SG, Judges: Strelets TG, Tatsiy LV, having examined the cassation appeal of the Limited Liability Company "ASTROGAS" against the decision of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv from 06.10.2020 and the decision of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal from 23.02.2021 in case №640 / 12569/19 on the claim of the Limited Liability Company "ASTROGAS" to the State services of geology and subsoil of Ukraine, third parties: Limited Liability Company "Naftogazsekspluatat More informations here: hxxps://reyestr.cour | brumbrum79 | |
08/4/2021 20:57 | go back on previous chats its all documented | thordon | |
07/4/2021 22:47 | Where can you find info abt ASKs? | researchcentre123 | |
07/4/2021 12:23 | The lowest ASK on show is 4.7p - only for 1 x 15k lot. After that it's just 3 x 15k lots @ 5p. Obviously negotiable although the trend appears to be definitely firm. f | fillipe | |
07/4/2021 11:54 | Somebody happy to pay 5p. Interesting | targatarga | |
07/4/2021 11:50 | Up-ticking today, since 1027hrs. f | fillipe | |
06/4/2021 21:13 | i suspect games played by Cadogan that i mean they could demand instead of shares in Proger Management SRL they could demand the shares in Proger. So no 3rd party shares If Proger Management SRL can not repay then in other words F''''''D and no option to transfer there holding in Proger. Game of Chess and one the new CEO can stick two fingers at the old CEO for doing the deal with his mates. | thordon | |
06/4/2021 19:20 | depends if Proger SRL is worth anything now or if Proger I can rake up any cash. | russman | |
06/4/2021 08:29 | I can't see owning a minority stake in proger is much good to Cadogan. If somehow they could get on with Proger (big ask) perhaps they could engineer a majority (issue some shares?) Then you have a business, Proger get a listing....This all assumes that Proger is actually worth something, which I don't know anything about. Otherwise taking a minority stake in a hostile company makes no sense, as they'll pay no divs and take the profits out in expenses and salaries. | researchcentre123 | |
05/4/2021 12:16 | Cadogan will still be held by the share holders , its where a company increases its holding in another company and is covered by reverse takeover rules. As the stake is worth more the Cadogan current share price which is undervalued anyway. | thordon |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions