![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blinkx | LSE:BLNX | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B1WBW239 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 20.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/2/2015 08:45 | Digi, You should have sold when the share price was over 200p...You wouldn't be so desperate and bitter now... | ![]() sikhthetech | |
27/2/2015 08:39 | Buying seems to have dried up! What a pity Blinkx dont try a little positive PR if they've got any Follow Monitise's example yesterday I can see this finishing deep in the red by this afternoon | leluot3 | |
27/2/2015 08:35 | Alex, On that we agree. Hardly our most vocal supporter since joining the team. i.e Complete silence. | ![]() loafofbread | |
27/2/2015 08:30 | "thrilled" was SC's fave. My own thrill was when SC stepped down. 1gw: appreciate your attention to detail. | luafc | |
27/2/2015 08:14 | Loaf - that is the kind of post that starts my day off with a smile. Great understanding of those two my friend. The Alex spin took a mighty 5 minutes. lol | ![]() barkboo | |
27/2/2015 08:08 | Judy Vezmar is standing down from the board of Rightmove. My assumption is she needs the extra time to concentrate on her NED role at Blinkx as they go through a five year period of mega growth and worldwide domination! 1gw and Alex may have a different slant on the announcement!? | ![]() loafofbread | |
27/2/2015 08:08 | 26p anyone?No..... Just Lou Lou and the gang.Last day of trade and we are in a closed period from Monday.Shares are all about dried up!Naked shorts will burn in hell! | quilarvium | |
27/2/2015 08:05 | Becky, that made me laff, expect the next one to be 5 cookery lessons alex, no question of shooting the messenger and it certainly wasn't an attack. 1gw, nice one, Dan has always gone out of his way to be helpful with calls/lengthy emails over the weekend. | ![]() shroder | |
27/2/2015 08:04 | well a small brain is better tha the digi no brain and we all know there are no guaranteers in this game are you prepared for black friday? or should that be red friday?! | leluot3 | |
27/2/2015 08:03 | Still in auction ? | toogood | |
27/2/2015 07:52 | and for your small brain lelout....we are gonna make some serious money again on this one and you know it.....talk and paste all you like,you wont stop this train now.... | ![]() digitalis | |
27/2/2015 07:49 | So digitalis filters his own posts! The ramping clowns that predicted 36p on Monday will be looking at 26p any day now! This is the worst BOD of any AIM company. Short on everything! Watch the fall in share price today. Just as I predicted seven days ago. And I'm always right | leluot3 | |
27/2/2015 07:48 | exactly.....now keep up the good work bashing,spamming and spinning.... | ![]() digitalis | |
27/2/2015 07:47 | I don't rate your idea of 'privilege' very highly.You must losing a packet.Have you told the wife they are 30p? | ![]() jonc | |
27/2/2015 07:38 | Lol.Digits at has filtered me for the fourth time.What an insane little man he is. | ![]() jonc | |
27/2/2015 07:36 | wow....rack em up leluot3 26 Feb'15 - 19:20 - 91047 of 91058 2 0 (premium) (Filtered) JonC 26 Feb'15 - 20:46 - 91048 of 91058 1 0 (premium) (Filtered) JonC 26 Feb'15 - 20:49 - 91049 of 91058 1 0 (premium) (Filtered) Simon E Self 26 Feb'15 - 20:57 - 91050 of 91058 1 0 (Filtered) JonC 26 Feb'15 - 20:58 - 91051 of 91058 1 0 (premium) (Filtered) Simon E Self 26 Feb'15 - 21:03 - 91052 of 91058 0 0 (Filtered) custardpie 26 Feb'15 - 21:17 - 91053 of 91058 0 2 (Filtered) | ![]() digitalis | |
27/2/2015 07:21 | Change of auditor. I have had a reply from Dan Slivjanowski on this. He states that "while our original aim ...was to determine new auditor for FY2016, we elected to make the change sooner based on our award to PwC." He also makes the point that "we maintain a great relationship with Deloitte - and still use the firm for specific projects." | ![]() 1gw | |
27/2/2015 03:47 | Shroder - what a disappointing attack on 1gw, one of the few posters who does some genuine research before making comments on this thread. Whilst I differ from you on some of your views on Blinkx I did at least think that you were attempting to provide some research to support your optimism. Unfortunatley, you are becoming like all the others who get upset if someone posts a criticism of the company. The most astonishing thing for me in following the posts on Blinkx is how uncritical many of the holders are. Uncritical, that is, in public. I might take the pi*s sometimes but I do believe that everyone who posts here has a decent brain in their heads and many will have private opinions that differ from their public announcements. I share 1gw's opinion on company RNS. They emphasised Samsung because they believed that it would give the impression that they had poached a high flyer from a respected company. The guy has good experience, there was no need to do that. They also fail to provide hard numbers - using adjusted EBITDA in their last trading update to mask losses and failing to provide the full picture on the Adkarma purchase. The price paid looks too cheap, unless of course it it is burning cash or highly leveraged. Information that was never provided by Blinkx. The problem with these types of updates is that you get the feeling that you might just be having the wool pulled over your eyes. Don't shoot the messenger. | ![]() alex1621 | |
26/2/2015 22:46 | JonC - most normal people see you and the rest of the rags as not so much meet the fockers - as meet the silly fockers! Custard Pie, like many of us - are not interested in silly fockers! | ![]() barkboo |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions