Yes and no
Easy to break it under stress as an individual user I found so extrapolate that to hundreds if thousands or millions of users hitting the system I don’t think it would pass.
All imho
Pricing would perhaps become uncompetitive if they had to throw lots of Cloud compute horsepower at it.
My guess these startups have discovered how difficult this really is.
Stephen did say it would be.
So back to Blackbirds technology USP I guess
It becomes more important for very large companies with millions of users and public performance perception and bad brand damaging PR. |
Didn't Scenery work? |
John
Correct imho
Another company called Sequence has had to pull back because they can’t seem to get it to work outside of their office (it seems)
I have been on their waiting list for years and it’s still Alpha
Has lots of features present that investors criticise elevate for not having but ours works 😀 |
The top engineering guy at Scenery used to work at Adobe he appears to have gone back and taken some people with him.
Probably because they were about to lose their jobs at Scenery?
I can’t see Adobe working with Scenery it’s not their style.
So waiting for the next announcement from Scenery
Anyway we currently have little to no competition in Cloud video editing
Having said that Adobe is working on a web based video editing tool (publicly talked about) so that’s interesting |
We’re obviously on the same path cabi. |
‘We are thrilled to tell you that we have decided to join forces with a larger platform to help realize our vision of creating a collaborative, AI-powered video creation product. We can’t yet say where we’re going, but we can say that they share this vision, and this decision gives us the best opportunity to help make our vision a reality at scale.’
It doesn’t seem that any significant value has been realised by Scenery’s owners, so presumably whatever they had was not much beyond an unscaleable front end.
The idea that cloud native video editing at scale had been achieved by Scenery, and somehow acquired by Adobe, for an insignificant amount doesn’t seem credible. |
Well, what ever happened between scenery and adobe they are no longer competing. Scenery statement is pretty appreciative of josh mcfarland / greylock so I don't imagine developers all just packed in work and moved to adobe without all parting on good terms.It shows adobe want collaborative cloud editing and with their record of buying up competition, should be an interesring 2025. Sooner rather than later for me. |
We are thrilled to tell you that we have decided to join forces with a larger platform to help realize our vision of creating a collaborative.
Scenery team and I are happy to announce that we are now with Adobe! We had an amazing journey and I'm extremely proud of the product and company we created at Scenery. Thank you to our investors, customers and all our employees that made my life so full for the past 5 years. I'm thrilled to take that momentum and help build the next generation of creative products with my amazing new colleagues. Onward! |
Overlapping posts cabi |
We know software engineers who previously worked for Scenery are now working for Adobe but did Adobe really buy Scenery?
I see no evidence for it beyond speculation on here. |
Well, one way or another, Adobe/Scenery appear to be an item. |
They haven’t bought Scenery.
The Scenery team have just joined Adobe. |
What is Adobe gaining by buying Scenery? |
Come on adobe, what you waiting for? You've already taken out scenery. I only want a pound a share, bargain. If you don't want the tech your only gonna have to pay a lot more to take out a competitor later on! |
When you compare AIM with the rest of the FTSE the P/E is similar, the yield is slightly less but the EPS growth is almost double.
AIM isn't quite the basket case it is made out to be.
Having said that the market mood definitely seems to be 'risk off'. |
Who’s JB? |
Chris
Interesting
I’m thinking that there should be one easy access giant global 24hr stock exchange if the listed company has multi country sales market.
I also wonder if AI will decimate back office jobs in the City I suspect a lot of structural change over the next few years. |
There's no question that AIM is not performing as was originally intended and its poor performance only compounds the failure of the main Stock Market (something like £30BN delisting from London this year). If the economy is to recover the LSE needs to reform itself or more likely given its recent performance be reformed by the Government. Its Spanish practices need to be sorted out with for example late notification of transactions which have been a frequent feature of BIRDs history needing to be made a serious felony (i.e. A Crown Court matter with eye watering fines and prison available as sentences)
The problem for BIRD investors is that being an AIM listed stock can have a significant impact on tax reliefs e.g. for IHT where 40% exposure can be reduced to nil.
Having AIM as the launch pad for a wide range of new technology stocks should be the target of any reforms. Spreading tax relief more widely to the benefits of ownership could attract £BNs for investment in the UK. |
:D
There’s no shortage of delusion round here |
NickB
I have always believed in establishing the facts and go where they lead. Anything less than that risks being a delusion.
Your post about long form and quality editing being elevate's strengths sounds like perfect positioning for the most professional customers.
That's excellent news, and great anticipation of what will be needed. |
I think salmon needs a break. He’s having trouble with humour and showing signs of tension.
Stop worrying salmon, everything here is going to be amazing. It’s been declared a BUY. |
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
Hot Features
Premium
