AIM is a bit dire at the moment, but if a business is making money and growing, the share price will eventually reflect that. |
Now you're sounding like a bot again, NickB, although I know that you're not.
I'm afraid IM has misled us at least twice on timing.
He might be learning to under-promise and over-deliver, although it seems to be a work in progress. |
Concentrate.
Agreed.
It’s very impressive.
It’s just a shame no one is interested in AIM stocks, because 2 years back this would have taken off on that news.
100k user announcement, and some positive write ups might draw a few people in, otherwise we will have to wait until we see some money coming in. |
For all the BS on this board, let's celebrate the actual story: 1,000 users to 40,000 users in two months. |
‘ they don't have features on the shelf ready to go’
😂 it’s not Tesco home delivery |
So 3 weeks since the questionnaire and nada.
Makes me think they don't have features on the shelf ready to go and that was more to prioritise what they are working on. |
HB Thanks for explaining the comment I didn’t understand it!
Interesting, so what have they said that you don’t trust? |
There is no ‘loyalty’;, we could trust them 157%, it wouldn’t alter anything.
We own shares in BIRD with the hope and expectation of some return, otherwise why would we be here? But there is no guarantee of success.
Maybe you should take yourself less seriously horneblower.
BIRD will fly or it won’t. Not long to wait now. |
5p or 7p by year end?
I’m going 5p, as I think the institution is going to want to be done selling by then, so could push price down further.
Plus I think the last announcement of 40k users is the last we are going to hear from Blackbird this year.
However if SSB/The Riddler posts one of his charts, we could go to 4p. |
I don’t trust anyone when money is involved. |
Hi, cocorico,
I don't really think they are bots. I just reacted to NickB and salmon9 saying they trusted the directors 100% and johnveals saying 90%.
I don't trust anyone more than 60%, let alone directors of an AIM company that I have never met!
Such loyalty is madness, hence my bot accusation.
Good luck. |
HB
I have sent you a PM
regards |
It's the downside of having funds as investors. They have no control over when they have to fund redemptions by their investors. When they do get an outflow they have to sell some of the fund investments to finance the required repayment. Clearly they sell those that have underperformed and BIRD is likely to be well up if not top of the list because of its past history. It may have more promise than all of the rest of their investments put together but that is as yet uncertain whereas the need to repay their investors now is certain and urgent. They don't use their own money to fund the redemptions. |
Out of the loop here. What confirms we are paid bots?
Also, I'm growing weary of commenting here so if anyone would like to pay me to continue, just pm for bank ac dert. |
Horneblower
What is the point in your comment?
Is it in any way constructive and helpful, or is it just a sense of misguided humour?
I have had alot on recently and made an oversight. Big deal! |
Oh dear.
I always suspected you all were bots.
This rather confirms it. |
NickB
Of course, I see what you mean. Instead of even considering individual investor portfolios, I had simply thought about funds that individuals would be invested in. How silly of me to only consider part of the picture. |
A slight equivalent would be me looking after someone else’s investment portfolio if they wanted to close it I would be forced to sell at 5.5p
Fund investors will be under pressure themselves. |
My guess would be there are declared rules that must be followed.
Remember fund managers get paid on AUM, and seek to avoid underperforming their benchmark, not making money for their clients.
It will not ultimately matter for us. |
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
Hot Features
Premium
