Bahamas Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[dynamohum] 08/1/2021 10:54

I don’t own any shares . .
Am I losing out ?

[linton78] 08/1/2021 10:48

TS1 - posted by page of cups yesterday around lunchtime on LSE. Check his posting history.

It was a speculative comment but included detail of Miami University for testing... did he pluck that out of the air or...?

Ps - good to see big sissy flapping around with no shares. Somethings don’t change.

[bigsi2] 08/1/2021 10:35

Reeks of desperation

[bigsi2] 08/1/2021 10:35

I've always found rumours started by desperate holders on LSE to have a high degree of accuracy...Was it per chance the same individual that started the rumour over an imminent deal with EXXON or a deal with SHELL?

[thatsmart1] 08/1/2021 10:18

Which post on LSE are you talking about Linton as the first one I can see is your one over here? Is this just a rumour you started?

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 09:43

SEEMS THEY HAVE FOUND WATER. HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAH 👏👏👏🤣8161;😀ԅ12;🗑🗑;


Linton788 Jan '21 - 09:21 - 49042 of 49044
0 3 2
Speculation of fluid samples being taken from P1 to Miami University for analysis by helicopter yesterday over on LSE.

If that is the case....

I wouldn’t want to be out of this one over the weekend.... :-)

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 09:43

SEEMS THEY HAVE FOUND WATER. HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAH 👏👏👏🤣8161;😀ԅ12;🗑🗑;


Linton788 Jan '21 - 09:21 - 49042 of 49044
0 3 2
Speculation of fluid samples being taken from P1 to Miami University for analysis by helicopter yesterday over on LSE.

If that is the case....

I wouldn’t want to be out of this one over the weekend.... :-)

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 09:42

My idiots are now losing another 2.5% today. Hahahahaha hahahhahahah

Soon my millionaires can celebrate their 1p January party. Idiots. 🗑🗑🗑🗑8512;😀ԅ12;😀😀;😀👏👏👏
28079;

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 09:41

My idiots are now losing another 2.5% today. Hahahahaha hahahhahahah

Soon my millionaires can celebrate their 1p January party. Idiots. 🗑🗑🗑🗑8512;😀ԅ12;😀😀;😀👏👏👏
28079;

[eggchaser] 08/1/2021 09:24

Credit to StarChild of LSE fame and fortune.I think today's RNS is very good. 1. Ex-CERP assets progressing well with mega plans this year to achieve 2,500 Boe/day by end of year2. No more shares issued at this time. Decision whether to do so or not extended till next week 13/1/21. 3. As I read it, worst case scenario is an additional £3.75 million (US$5 million) .......188m shares........... as the final final final funding requirement for all ex-CERP and Percy-1 exploration operations, with no additional enforced privileges to Lombard. 4. I believe 13/1/21 has been chosen because it would be 23 days into the drill and the BoD will confidentially know (a) if all or some additional drilling contingency costs will be needed, (b) whether there is evidence of oil so far. 5. To me, it does not mean if the £3.75m is converted on or soon after 13/1/21 the drill is a duster. 6. I get the impression the BoD and possibly Lombard know something we don't yet. But the BoD can't disclose until (a) they are sure and (b) Gov informed. Refer to the last past of para 6.iii as it seems to me Lombard are going out of there way to be flexible and nice!!!! Why?!!!!7. To add to point 6, I see no evidence of Lombard doing massive share-dumping in the last few days. Is it low volumes or something else? IMHO. DYOR.

[linton78] 08/1/2021 09:21

Speculation of fluid samples being taken from P1 to Miami University for analysis by helicopter yesterday over on LSE.

If that is the case....

I wouldn’t want to be out of this one over the weekend.... :-)

[casket1] 08/1/2021 09:04

#"We are very concerned that the drilling rig is still continuing off the west side of Andros because of the impact to the environment that is happening right now.... Oil drilling in our waters is a serious threat to current and future generations of Bahamians and needs to be considered very carefully, not rushed into under a cloud of secrecy.',,,,,,,

Not sure I would characterise 10 years as "rushed into"........

[pro_s2009] 08/1/2021 08:29

..........."There's no sense in finding oil and contributing to the destruction of the environment," he said. "It goes completely against the Prime Minister's wishes, and those of his government. It goes completely against all the commitments that The Bahamas has signed on to regarding environmental protection and mitigating climate change."

#Joe Darville, chairman of Save the Bays, one of the two environmental groups bringing the action, described himself as "ecstatic" over yesterday's ruling. He added: "Oil drilling should not proceed if it is not conducted in accordance with the law and not in the best interest of our people.

#"A key part of the mission of Save the Bays is to fight against the scourge of unregulated development, and ensure that every foreign investor who comes here with a plan acts according to the laws of The Bahamas and in the best interest of the people. We intend to hold BPC to that standard."

#However, Casuarina McKinney, the Bahamas Reef Environment Educational Foundation (BREEF) executive director, was more circumspect.

#She told Tribune Business: "The judge's decision to allow the Judicial Review to proceed is a huge victory for the environment and for the rights of Bahamians to be heard on something that affects all of us.

#"We are very concerned that the drilling rig is still continuing off the west side of Andros because of the impact to the environment that is happening right now.... Oil drilling in our waters is a serious threat to current and future generations of Bahamians and needs to be considered very carefully, not rushed into under a cloud of secrecy.',,,,,,,

[pro_s2009] 08/1/2021 08:29

..........."There's no sense in finding oil and contributing to the destruction of the environment," he said. "It goes completely against the Prime Minister's wishes, and those of his government. It goes completely against all the commitments that The Bahamas has signed on to regarding environmental protection and mitigating climate change."

#Joe Darville, chairman of Save the Bays, one of the two environmental groups bringing the action, described himself as "ecstatic" over yesterday's ruling. He added: "Oil drilling should not proceed if it is not conducted in accordance with the law and not in the best interest of our people.

#"A key part of the mission of Save the Bays is to fight against the scourge of unregulated development, and ensure that every foreign investor who comes here with a plan acts according to the laws of The Bahamas and in the best interest of the people. We intend to hold BPC to that standard."

#However, Casuarina McKinney, the Bahamas Reef Environment Educational Foundation (BREEF) executive director, was more circumspect.

#She told Tribune Business: "The judge's decision to allow the Judicial Review to proceed is a huge victory for the environment and for the rights of Bahamians to be heard on something that affects all of us.

#"We are very concerned that the drilling rig is still continuing off the west side of Andros because of the impact to the environment that is happening right now.... Oil drilling in our waters is a serious threat to current and future generations of Bahamians and needs to be considered very carefully, not rushed into under a cloud of secrecy.',,,,,,,

[pro_s2009] 08/1/2021 08:27

...........While the Supreme Court's rejection of a "stay" was the main result BPC was seeking, since it largely removes all obstacles to the completion of its Perseverance One exploratory well, its opponents have hailed the fact that Justice Hanna-Adderley has given them permission to bring Judicial Review proceedings against all the project's permits and approvals.

#In particular, she agreed that the Planning and Subdivisions Act applied to BPC's project, and that it likely needed site plan approval under this law. "The definition of land as set out in Section 4(1) of the Planning and Subdivisions Act seems to suggest that the drill site is located within the territorial waters of The Bahamas and would be subject to the Planning and Subdivisions Act," the judge found.

#"In my view the applicants have an arguable case on the applicability of the Planning and Subdivisions Act...... I find that the Town Planning Committee should be joined as a party to this action as its presence before the court is necessary to ensure that all of the matters in dispute may be effectually and completely determined."...............

[pro_s2009] 08/1/2021 08:27

...........While the Supreme Court's rejection of a "stay" was the main result BPC was seeking, since it largely removes all obstacles to the completion of its Perseverance One exploratory well, its opponents have hailed the fact that Justice Hanna-Adderley has given them permission to bring Judicial Review proceedings against all the project's permits and approvals.

#In particular, she agreed that the Planning and Subdivisions Act applied to BPC's project, and that it likely needed site plan approval under this law. "The definition of land as set out in Section 4(1) of the Planning and Subdivisions Act seems to suggest that the drill site is located within the territorial waters of The Bahamas and would be subject to the Planning and Subdivisions Act," the judge found.

#"In my view the applicants have an arguable case on the applicability of the Planning and Subdivisions Act...... I find that the Town Planning Committee should be joined as a party to this action as its presence before the court is necessary to ensure that all of the matters in dispute may be effectually and completely determined."...............

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 08:23

Brilliant post by BigSi for our bin 🗑 boy Linton. Hahahahaha hahahhahahah

According to you it share price was supposed to be 5-6p on spud ...
now it’s 4-5p on a strike??!!!

Your newfound grip on reality is very refreshing.

You’ve continually berated PRO for simply pointing out the reality BPCs situation as it currently exists based on what have transpired to be correct understandings of the company’s own updates... seems silly no??!

Low life still has not honoured his debt to BigSi. Well expectations were low from a peasant. 😢

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 08:23

Brilliant post by BigSi for our bin 🗑 boy Linton. Hahahahaha hahahhahahah

According to you it share price was supposed to be 5-6p on spud ...
now it’s 4-5p on a strike??!!!

Your newfound grip on reality is very refreshing.

You’ve continually berated PRO for simply pointing out the reality BPCs situation as it currently exists based on what have transpired to be correct understandings of the company’s own updates... seems silly no??!

Low life still has not honoured his debt to BigSi. Well expectations were low from a peasant. 😢

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 08:22

My idiots are losing money again HAHAHHA 😂 and it is only Jan 7. 2.1p bid. Some genius went short at 3.2p and sold at 2.35p. Hahahahaha hahahhahahah

[specialistlegionsupercharged] 08/1/2021 08:22

My idiots are losing money again HAHAHHA 😂 and it is only Jan 7. 2.1p bid. Some genius went short at 3.2p and sold at 2.35p. Hahahahaha hahahhahahah

[linton78] 07/1/2021 21:32

Happy new year to you Egg.

You are a lone poster I can see amongst a sea of filtered posts!

[bigsi2] 07/1/2021 16:04

Perhaps he views it as charitable work

[eggchaser] 07/1/2021 15:50

It's a bit late for a no drill campaign!!!Lol they lost - the drill is still heading down!!

[eggchaser] 07/1/2021 15:48

Credit to StarChild of LSE fame and fortune.I think today's RNS is very good. 1. Ex-CERP assets progressing well with mega plans this year to achieve 2,500 Boe/day by end of year2. No more shares issued at this time. Decision whether to do so or not extended till next week 13/1/21. 3. As I read it, worst case scenario is an additional £3.75 million (US$5 million) .......188m shares........... as the final final final funding requirement for all ex-CERP and Percy-1 exploration operations, with no additional enforced privileges to Lombard. 4. I believe 13/1/21 has been chosen because it would be 23 days into the drill and the BoD will confidentially know (a) if all or some additional drilling contingency costs will be needed, (b) whether there is evidence of oil so far. 5. To me, it does not mean if the £3.75m is converted on or soon after 13/1/21 the drill is a duster. 6. I get the impression the BoD and possibly Lombard know something we don't yet. But the BoD can't disclose until (a) they are sure and (b) Gov informed. Refer to the last past of para 6.iii as it seems to me Lombard are going out of there way to be flexible and nice!!!! Why?!!!!7. To add to point 6, I see no evidence of Lombard doing massive share-dumping in the last few days. Is it low volumes or something else? IMHO. DYOR.

[eggchaser] 07/1/2021 15:47

I'd say his behaviour is bordering on grooming.... pmsl