Bacanora Lithium Share Price (BCN)

Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Bacanora Lithium Plc LSE:BCN London Ordinary Share GB00BD20C246 ORDS 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  1.25 5.81% 22.75 57,568 08:00:09
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
21.50 24.00 22.75 21.50 22.75
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining -8.71 -6.30 51
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
08:28:58 O 105 23.70 GBX
Related Shares
Rio Tinto (RIO), Bhp (BHP), Mila Resources (MILA), African Battery Metals (ABM)

Bacanora Lithium (BCN) Latest News

Bacanora Lithium News

Date Time Source Headline
10/9/202016:01ALNCUK TRADING UPDATE SUMMARY: Prime People Hurt As Covid Hits Job Market
10/9/202007:45ALNCFAlliance News Flash Headline
10/9/202007:00UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Sonora Operational Update
18/6/202015:15UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Transaction Notification
11/6/202011:46UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Result of AGM
28/5/202007:00UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Sonora Lithium Project and Covid-19 Update
18/5/202007:00UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Notice of AGM
28/4/202011:05UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Second Price Monitoring Extn
28/4/202011:00UKREGBacanora Lithium PLC Price Monitoring Extension
20/4/202007:00UKREGIlika plc CEO appointed as NED of Bacanora Lithium plc
More Bacanora Lithium News
Bacanora Lithium Takeover Rumours

Bacanora Lithium (BCN) Discussions and Chat

Bacanora Lithium Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
18/9/202019:40Bacanora Minerals4,854
13/9/202014:40FINANCIAL TIMES: NEW BATTERY TO TRANSFORM ELECTRIC CARS3
13/9/202014:40Bacanora Minerals to head back to 60p37
13/9/202014:39long term holder4
24/10/201711:24BCN 70p to 33p?213

Add a New Thread

Bacanora Lithium (BCN) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
07:29:0023.7010524.89O
07:21:2023.7021049.77O
07:20:4621.533,000645.75O
07:20:4423.98122.88O
07:17:5923.98122.88O
View all Bacanora Lithium trades in real-time

Bacanora Lithium (BCN) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
22/9/2020
09:20		Bacanora Lithium Daily Update: Bacanora Lithium Plc is listed in the Mining sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BCN. The last closing price for Bacanora Lithium was 21.50p.
Bacanora Lithium Plc has a 4 week average price of 21.25p and a 12 week average price of 20.50p.
The 1 year high share price is 42.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 15p.
There are currently 222,981,837 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 417,905 shares. The market capitalisation of Bacanora Lithium Plc is £50,728,367.92.
Read Full Thread
Reply
21/3/2020
12:18		r65767: If you read the statements. 18 Months to Build production facilities and commence production. After that takes only 4 years production to cover costs of build - and every thing then is profit. Second stage is to double production. So waiting on Gangfeng for EPC. Then funding. Then start. This was supposed to be q1/q2 2020. This is delayed because of COVID19. China seems to be back to work (so Ganfeng to). Secker said last month it was delayed by COVID19. But now expected within 6 months (now 5 months) This share was between 80 and 112p a few years, and spiked to around 140-150p on the definitive cost/resource estimates. Good prospects for those that hold their nerves in this time of panic in the markets. Thing is its not like they have huge costs and dividends to pay. So just a waiting game because they have a cash position similar to its market cap. But lots of assets whose value is not represented in the Share price.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
17/10/2019
07:09		saint in exile: Finance will need to be sorted in the short term and when that is the share price will turn around for sure.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
07/8/2019
15:22		richsawko: I note Gleencore has halted production of cobalt at a mine in Afric citing reduction in price if the product used in car batteries due to over production. Could this be the reason behind the fall in our share price?
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
03/7/2019
14:16		jas0701: Thanks techI would've thought the share price would go sideways from 50p. Okay mm's might scare some pi's to get out and make a loss but then new pi's get in at lower price and will take their profits when share price rises. I'm sure if the price was kept at 50p plus new investors surely would've paid the higher price as company is doing really well in making positive strives.Really disappointed. Oh well it is what it is.It will correct itself either way.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
01/7/2019
16:51		marvelman: Steeplejack...just spotted your response to me amongst your post 4543..thank you. "GFL has an option to increase its interest in SLL to up to 50% within 24 months at a valuation based on the share price of Bacanora at the time of subsequent investment"# "I’m not sure what that means,Marvelman.Hopefully it does mean capital investment someway down the line" For me this is key. As I have already stated I sold this morning.I do now find it difficult to get a re-entry share price if it does come down further to an opportunistic level (which I actually hope it doesn't for the sake of those still invested as I have made my choice to exit and am content). It now not about the market cap which has always been understated but about the price GFL will need to pay per share to take their additional 50%. A bit of a conundrum. The ambiguity of the RNS makes it difficult to assess.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
01/7/2019
10:50		steeplejack: The 20th May RNS is more explanatory.To determine the 25p buy in price they used 20 day share price averages.They paid just over £7.5m for a 22.5% stake in Sonara but the price paid was referenced to the valuation being applied to Bacanora as a whole and the 25p paid for the 29.99% interest.This makes sense,BCN has other interests not just Sonara.The price that Ganfeng might pay for a further 27.5% of Sonara will probably be determined by the same formula.If you used,purely to provide an example,that same formula in say a months time and the BCN price averaged around 55p for twenty days,then a 27.5% slug of equity might cost Ganfeng around £18m ie the average price at 55p would be 2.2x the 25p average used before plus they’d be buying 5% more than previously.So there’s an incentive for all and sundry to push the BCN price as high as possible so the Chinese have to pay up! "GFL has an option to increase its interest in SLL to up to 50% within 24 months at a valuation based on the share price of Bacanora at the time of subsequent investment"# I’m not sure what that means,Marvelman.Hopefully it does mean capital investment someway down the line. As part of the Strategic Investment, GFL would subscribe for a 29.99% equity interest in Bacanora for a cash consideration of GBP14,400,091, being 57,600,364 new ordinary shares in the Company (the "Private Placement"), at a price of 25 pence per share, representing the volume weighted average price ("VWAP") on AIM of the Company's shares over the previous 20 trading days at the time of negotiation. Subject to the completion of the Private Placement, GFL would have the right to nominate one director to the main board of Bacanora. GFL would also be granted pre-emption rights in relation to new share issues proportionate to its interest in Bacanora. In addition, as part of the Strategic Investment GFL would be granted the right to acquire an initial 22.5% interest in a subsidiary of Bacanora which holds the Sonora Project ("Project Level Company"), for a cash payment of GBP7,563,649, equivalent to a price of 25 pence per share on the same basis as the Private Placement (the "Project Level Investment"). Subject to the completion of the Project Level Investment, GFL would have the right to nominate one director to the board of the Project Level Company. GFL would also be granted an option to increase its interest in the Project Level Company to up to 50% from 22.5%, within 24 months of the completion of the Project Level Investment. The valuation of any additional investment in the Project Level Company by GFL would be based on the share price of Bacanora at the time of the additional purchase. paragraph,you’ll see they paid around £7.5m for 22.5% of Sonara.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
01/7/2019
09:54		steeplejack: "GFL would also be granted pre-emption rights in relation to new share issues proportionate to its interest in Bacanora."More than likely they'll be an equity issue at some juncture as this extract from the RNS in the 20th May implies.By the by,the fact that Ganfeng will commit to providing project finance for Sonara of x million can't be translated into an implied BCN share price.The market capitalisation of the company and the capital outlay involved in bringing Sonara to production are two totally different things.Ganfeng have triumphed buying in to 29.9% of Bacanora at 25p.Read the statements and they have an option to further increase their stake in the Sonara project to 50% at a price determined by the Bacanora share price in the period prior to making a deal.Buying an equity interest in Sonara is one thing,the capital outlay another.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
02/5/2019
02:13		johncasey: lithium stocks in demand! Wesfarmers lines up Kidman Resources as latest takeover target By Lorna Nicholas - May 2, 2019 Wesfarmers Kidman Resources ASX KDR WES lithium takeover bid Wesfarmers’ bid values Kidman Resources at $776 million ($1.90 per share) – a 47.3% premium to its last closing price. Kidman Resources (ASX: KDR) has become Wesfarmers’ (ASX: WES) latest takeover target after the conglomerate lobbed a $776 million bid for the advanced lithium explorer. Today’s bid come less than two months after Wesfarmers made a $1.5 billion unsolicited grab for rare earths miner Lynas Corporation (ASX: LYC). The offer was followed with a statement from Lynas’ board claiming it “would not engage with Wesfarmers on the terms outlined in the proposal” and advising shareholders there was no action to be taken regarding the unsolicited proposal. However, in this morning’s announcement, Kidman’s board has noted it will engage with Wesfarmers with a view to finalising a binding transaction that will be put to shareholders. As a result, Wesfarmers has been granted an exclusive period to complete due diligence on Kidman till the end of the month. Wesfarmers’ offer Under Wesfarmers’ offer, it proposes to acquire all of the shares in Kidman at $1.90 each, which represents a 47.3% premium to Kidman’s last closing price of $1.29 on Wednesday. The bid has numerous hurdles to jump before it becomes a done deal including various shareholder and regulatory approvals and Wesfarmers agreeing to certain commercial matters with Kidman’s joint venture partner Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA (SQM), which is the world’s largest lithium producer – accounting for 20% of global supply. Backing the deal are Kidman’s three major shareholders, which hold a combined 16% stake and have noted they would vote in favour of the takeover should it become binding. Wesfarmers has also shored up its intentions to cement the deal by scooping up almost 70 million shares in Kidman on Wednesday giving it a 17% interest. Kidman Resources snapshot Kidman owns 50% of the Mt Holland lithium project in Western Australia, which hosts the Earl Grey deposit – known as one of the world’s largest hard rock lithium deposits with a resource of 189 million tonnes at 1.5% lithium and a reserve of 94.2Mt at 1.5% lithium. A definitive feasibility study is underway to develop an integrated mine-to-refinery operation, with a plant proposed to be established in Kwinana WA to produce a battery grade lithium hydroxide product for lithium-ion battery markets. Under the prefeasibility study, which was released in December, the operation would have a 47-year life to generate total life-time revenue of US$33.3 billion to be shared by both parties. Wesfarmers’ rationale With a diversified business portfolio spanning retail, chemicals, energy and fertilisers Wesfarmers expects to draw on its cash reserves, operating capability and knowledge to facilitate the development of Kidman and SQM’s proposed mine and lithium hydroxide plant in Kwinana. Wesfarmers’ rationale is to secure a stake in the accelerating electric vehicle revolution where it anticipates it will generate attractive returns due to lithium being a critical raw material in EV batteries. Currently, Wesfarmers manufactures industrial chemicals and fertilisers in Kwinana, which are shipped nationally and overseas. The company expects its experience will complement that of SQM, which has a market cap of around $13 billion, and vast experience in producing and selling lithium products including lithium hydroxide. This morning’s news sent Kidman’s share price rocketing more than 40% to reach $1.83 before mid-morning, while Wesfarmer’s share price dipped 0.89% to $35.47.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
07/9/2017
16:04		simonsaid1: Shares are often sold at negotiated rates, that doesn't mean the market has to follow for some weird unwritten magic reason! Rather it suggests that Cadence needed cash and the buyer had some power in the negotiation. It's possible that they'll instantly dump the shares on the market and harm the BCN share price, but seems unlikely that a 'strategic investor' would go to all this trouble to accumulate for an immediate sale. Easier ways to make a living!
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
08/9/2014
02:57		gilbly: Good evening from Boston. Here for 4 days then move to New York, Philadelphia, then Washington and home. Posted this on REM as Seanywauny requested it. I meant to add a piece on the Magdelena Borate Project but have only managed to do a summary comment re the share price. I have updated the post 11717 but left the REM interest at 12.19% after the 25 July placing rather than make the small change to 11.90% without much impact. DL will no doubt be adding to this in the future. BCN shares also need updating to the latest figure but this is a small change also. These comments are not intended as investment advice; they are only my opinion and take on the potential value of the Sonora Lithium Project. Briefly the RNS news was not that bad, the indications are that the 4 holes south of the El Sauz and the single hole to the East are trending towards the end of the basin of the lithium bearing clay. However it is encouraging that mineralisation is still in evidence. Also there are great indications from the Buenavista surface sampling, with up to 1700ppm lithium values being found. So as we move forward they are planning a larger drilling program to determine the detailed open pit design information and to expand the lithium resource base into the Megalit. No word of whether they are hoping to progress to complete any PFS or a PEA and on to a BFS, but there now appears to be more urgency to increase the resource base which is encouraging and money is available for this. DL has stepped down from two posts and presumably this is to allow more focus on his main interests, so perhaps things may start to motor from now. SONORA LITHIUM PROJECT VENTURE OF BCN AND REM - CURRENT & POTENTIAL RESOURCES, NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) AND SHARE PRICE ESTIMATE This estimate and guesstimate attempt is based on post 11717 on the REM b/board which was drafted from a REM viewpoint The size of this concession still continues to creep into my thoughts as I still cannot believe the massive potential of the Sonora Lithium Project. REM (19/8/2014) have now exercised their ‘earn in’ option by accelerating the settling of the $1 million exploration costs and have increased their interest to 30% in the JV#2 and have a first refusal to increase this to 49.9% on both JVs. (respective deadline dates are 30th September for JV1 and December 2015 for JV2). This is likely to cost more than the previously agreed arrangement with BCN. However I am unsure if the Canadian rules will apply re any negotiations on this and therefore the timescales involved. With the new funding available to BCN and REM we should be able to advance the required drilling to put the size of the concessions on the map. No doubt that REM will continue to increase their strategic holding in BCN. The estimate reflects the fact we now have battery grade which increases the price from $6,000 / t to $6,500 / t. Also a further increase for LCE to $7,000 / t may be likely in the future and any price increase adds leverage to the mine valuation and eventual share price. Additional leverage to the mine value may also be possible as CO-E has suggested that operational costs may reduced to about $900 / tonne, which would give the net resource value a great boost, however the more conservative costing of $2000 / tone has been used here, which is close to the $1958 / tonne used in the BCN’s documented PEA. The respective resources for LV and JV#1 have been upgraded from 2.413mt to 3.283mt with JV#1 now also in the ‘indicated' category (4/6/2014). Regarding these current resources on LV and JV#1 (3.283mt) we have enough to supply 3 Tesla factories for 20 years and it is likely this resource is going to increase in the future. This just needs the future relevant studies to confirm and fully define and declare the grades and no doubt the FS and BFS will deliver. BCN have their Borate projects and REM have their Austrailian (Yangibana) and Greenland projects. The post covers the following sections: 1. Simple calculations on the CURRENT resource valuation (La Ventana and JV#1) 2. The POTENTIAL resource valuation of the Megalit concession (JV#2) and is based on GUESSWORK and yes it is a big guess which will only be determined with drilling. 3. An estimate at the Net Present Value (NPV) and Share Prices over the concessions based on the current and potential resources for each of: a) La Ventana ('Indicated' resource) b) JV#1 - Fleur / El Sauz ('Indicated' resource) c) JV#2 - Megalit, Buenavista and San Gabriel. NPV calculation is for only one of the 4 parallel trending structures and is based on a GUESS of the resources 4. Estimate of the Neodymium Oxide at Yangibana and a rough estimate of the TREO resource valuation (from a previous exploration). 5. Summary of the calculations 1. CURRENT RESOURCE VALUATION (considering La Ventana and JV#1) mt - is a million tonnes bn - is a billon - JV#1 (Fleur/ El Sauz) - REM own 30% and BCN own 70%. - La Ventana (LV) - BCN own 100%. - REM has now increased their interest in BCN from 11.85% to 12.19%. - (Need to update to 11.9%) - LV had 930K tonnes of LCE or 0.93mt indicated resource, which has now increased to 1.273 mt. - JV#1 had a 1.48mt LCE inferred resource, which is now an INDICATED resource of 2.01mt. - Battery grade confirmed, so rather than $6,000/tonne for LCE it is now $6,500/tonne. - Operating costs of $2,000/tonne as per BCN giving a resource value of $4,500 / tonne. - Possibility of adding leverage to the mine value with a potential increase in LCE price to $7,000 / t or higher and a possible reduction in Op. Costs to $900 / t. - REM shares in issue 5,453,375,717 on 12/6/14. - BCN new shares in issue after placing is 78,174,752 - (Need to update to 78,690,661). - Assume exchange rate USD to £ is 0.595. a) BCN's La Ventana resource is worth 1.273mt x $6,500 /t = $8.2745bn Op. cost is $2,000/t x 1.273mt = $2.546bn. So allowing for Op. Costs, the La Ventana resource worth = $5.7285bn b) JV#1 resource is worth 2.01mt x $6500/t = $13.065bn Op. cost is $2,000/t x 2.01mt = $4.02bn So allowing for Op. Costs the JV#1 resource worth = $9.045bn c) Thus the combined current resource gross value for La Ventana and JV#1 is $21.34bn. with Op cost of $6.57 gives a combined current net resource value for La Ventana and JV#1 of $14.7735bn. d) Current resource values for REM and BCN from LV and JV#1 above are: BCN is worth (0.7 x $9.045bn) + $5.7285bn = $12.060bn = £7.176bn (GBP). REM is worth (0.3 x $9.045bn) + (0.1219 x $12.060) = $4.1836bn = £2.4892bn (GBP) allowing for REM interest in BCN. So BCN is worth about 3 times REM’s resource value for LV and JV#1. e) So REM current resource value per share is £2.4892 bn / 5.454bn = £0.4564 = 45.64 pence. (Resource value per share, not share price) BCN current resource value per share is (£7.176 bn) / 78,174,752 = £91.79. (Excludes the warrents) So that is the estimate of the current resource values based on the resources which are presently defined at the ‘indicatedR17; stage of grading for the LV and JV#1 concessions. However there is significantly more resource potential in the ground if you check out all the news and we are obviously not finished exploring. However this is still very speculative as the drilling has just started and the results are just coming through. COST NOTES / COMMENTS Regarding any additional costs I assume that all costs are attributed to the mining operational cost of approx $2,000 / tonne. The actual operating costs of $1,958 / tonne stated by BCN in their PEA include all costs attributed to the mining process in the table 13 of Key Operating Cost Assumptions. So in fact no additional costs need to be considered. Further these cost may reduce, as the cost of the Metallurgical process in the PEA was for Pugging with acid, whilst the confirmed Roast Leaching process, which gave battery grade, is thought to cost slightly less, so in fact the cost may come down. In their April 2014 presentation notes REM refer to possible lower costs of about $1,500 / tonne for Fleur and El Sauz, if I read this correctly it was because of the higher grades, so the metallurgy is important. This means any reduction in costs will add leverage to the mine resource value. In a recent interview Colin Orr-Ewing suggests $900 / tonne is possible but it does seem on the low side. However he should know as BCN have built and commissioned a workable pilot plant and have already proved that ‘battery grade’ is possible and has also been independently verified. Therefore if this is the case it will increase the resource value after op costs by 23% and this would be another boost to the company’s potential as we can be more competitive and supply cheaper Lithium thus helping to reduce the price of batteries and cars. The pilot plant has also been utilised to produce Li samples for potential buyers to assess and we await news on this front as presumably the companies are in discussions with potential customers. In the recent interview CO-E also stated they had 40 years supply and it was scalable, however I think the current ‘indicatedR17; resources as defined for the LV and JV#2 concessions and last upgraded to 1.273 + 2.01 = 3.238mt is more than enough to keep battery producers supplied for many years. The JV#2 is just starting to be explored but we have a few subtle hints that it will be large and Section 2 guesstimates the resource potential. As the lithium is at the surface the mining will be open cast and easy and inexpensive to mine. There will be local labour available as we are close to a town and this is likely to be fairly cheap The operating costs in BCN report (PEA) include the following: mining at $2.50 / tonne, mechanisation, trucking, supplying water from the river, natural gas, buildings, electricity, transportation, staff and labour and presumably other overhead costs. Roads were not listed and capital, which is listed, would have to be raised to build the mine and the processing. INVESTMENT NOTES So what investment options are open to BCN and REM? On the question of the concessions, REM have stated they are an investment company and their original intention was not to mine the site but to fully explore the ventures and prove and declare the extent of the resource value, then sell it on. This appears to be different to the BCN approach where it looks as if they are in it for the long haul. However REM may have second thoughts given the massive potential of the Sonora project. More recently DL has in fact tweeted he has a ‘mine to start’ and maybe REM will stay invested up to the start stage then sell once in production when the potential is then immediately apparent to one and all. BCN and REM may receive an attractive contract offers for the ore and stay invested for the duration, which may be for many years to come. In this regard they may negotiate a contract with a financial arrangement to allow implementation of the design and manufacturing to facilitate production and at the same time enable them to extend the Megalit exploration work. In the future they may decide to sell part of the Sonora ventures if the price is attractive enough, retaining a part investment for the future, as it is sure to be a big earner in the years to come. This will help to develop other alternative opportunities and investments etc. It may depend on the level of enticement which may lead to a straight purchase of REM or BCN or a part purchase. If BCN are proceeding to production REM may sell to them or sell to another miner or Tesla, Ford or a Mexican Co. Again it may depend on the enticement to strike a deal. Despite the fact REM are an investment Co, I would like to see the REM and BCN venture go ahead and come to production and realise the full potential of this claim. Although REM may not be a miner they may well retain their investment strategy and add stability to the partnership in the medium term. There is nothing wrong staying invested, when and if, BCN eventually start production, as they have worked together and can possibly reach a further agreement on progressing the mine etc. Sonora after all is a large and valuable resource that does not come along every day. Based on the potential resource value the companies should certainly have no problem raising finance to progress the mining or for REM to make purchases or fund a merger deal with BCN. REM must know where they are going with this and probably BCN too, I'm sure, as DL doesn't positively tweet for nothing or invest in a 12% interest in BCN for nothing. Moneyweek ‘s Bengt thinks nobody has spotted this opportunity and some, excluding myself, have been invested in this for well over a year. It just shows how long it takes to be identified as a potential opportunity and highlights the massive difference between being an explorer and a producer. It all takes time and relatively speaking the JV has come a long way in a short space of time, now all we need is a little patience for the Sonora to be developed. As REM are funded for the Greenland exploration and now have $10 million available (YAGM) and have made an immediate draw down of $3 m, further REM buying into BCN may be on the cards, in particular the increase in JV interest from 30% to 49.9%. Also with the BCN placing and listing on AIM there will be adequate monies available for the joint partners to advance their common exploration and take it forward to a definable and feasible project in order to declare real value / worth in the ground. Albeit they define a small area at a time and slowly but surely continue to add shareholder value. It depends on how fast the current resource requires to be declared and proven through PFS, FS and BFS, or perhaps put another way how quick they will need to extract the ore out of the ground. At least the existing indicated grade is valid for use in a FS or PEA. Although the concessions are large it is not just about the Lithium resource value, as there will be other rare metals discovered on the concessions and some of these have already been documented. Continuation of post 2. POTENTIAL RESOURCE VALUE OF JV#2 BASED ON GUESSWORK (not yet drilled but has commenced with drill results due for the first holes) The following is an attempt to value the resources from what we know; however essentially it still remains GUESSWORK until it is adequately drilled and assayed etc. It has not passed unnoticed that there have been a fair number of indications from the REM board on the potential size of these concessions, particularly JV#2. So I think we have been getting plenty hints re the size of the Sonora Lithium claims. As Sonora has 10 concessions what are they actually worth? On 4 June the respective ‘indicated' resources for LV and JV#1 were upgraded from (0.93 + 1.483) = 2.413mt to (1.273 + 2.01) = 3.283mt. The recent upgrade gave no indication of length covered by the new drilling at La Ventana and Fleur / El Sauz, so the potential resource value will be based on the previous post 4514, i.e. over 10Km of drilling a resource of 2.413mt was achieved with a resource value of $10.66bn. BCN / REM have indicated that the Megalit (JV#2) concession has 4 parallel trending structures extending for a 40Km length with Lithium clay identified on the surface. This amounts to an overall length of 160Km compared to the current drill length of 10Km. (It covers 234,291 acres with 247,451 acres covering JV#1 and JV#2 ). It is hard to comprehend that a resource can extend for 160km or about 100 miles. i.e.approx from Newcastle to Edinburgh. So if these parallel trending sequences of the Megalit concessions are consistent and contiguous fields in line with what has been drilled and with similar Lithium concentrations, is it conceivable that we may be looking at a 16 fold increase on the previously calculated resources of 2.413 mt for the 10Km drilled length. Assuming this is the case and we allow for $2000 operating costs, we have: a) A resource tonnage of 16 x 2.41 = 38.56mt. b) A resource value of 38.56mt x $4,500 / t = $173.5bn or £103.23bn. (GBP). Potentially a very large resource value, but still only guesswork until drilled. Currently Megalit ownership (JV#2) is: BCN own 70% and REM now own 30% and ignoring REM's current 12.19% interest in BCN, the potential resource valuations becomes: c) BCN resource is worth (0.7 x $173.5bn) = $121.5bn (USD) or £72.292bn (GBP). A resource value per share of £72.292bn / 78,174,752 = £924.75 (GBP.) i.e. over 20 years, £46.24 /year. d) REM resource is worth (0.3 x $173.5bn) = $52bn (USD) or £31bn (GBP). A resource value per share of £31bn / 5.4534bn = £5.68 (GBP). i.e over 20 years, 28.4p / year. Allowing for REM interest of 12.19% in BCN ($14.81bn), we have: e) REM resource value increasing from $52bn to $66.8108bn or £39.73bn Combining the LV and JV#1 resource values with the JV#2 guesstimate gives: f) A total resource = 40.973mt and a resource value of £14.773bn + $173.5bn = $188.273bn. g) REM total resource value = $4.1836 + $ 66.8108bn = $70.994bn. h) BCN total resource value = $12.06 + $121.5 = $133.56bn It is obvious that the BCN resource value is almost twice REM and with significantly less shares in issue than REM this will lead to a higher resource value per share. So that's an update on a guesstimate as to the resource value of the JV#2 / Megalit concessions. Remember the JV#2 resource at this stage is just a guess for the time being and purely speculative and only my viewpoint at the moment; however a large drilling program is now being targeted for the Megalit exploration. Note all other REM and BCN projects have been neglected but there may be some news re these resources shortly as progress is being made. A SIMPLIER APPROACH TO ESTIMATE THE POTENTIAL RESOURCE VALUE OF JV#2 (Still uses $10.66bn and not the $14.77bn with the upgrade as unsure of the LV and JV#1 drilled length) A much simpler approach is to consider that we completed drilling over a 10Km length across La Ventana and JV#1 and now have an indicated resource worth of $10.66bn which is equivalent to just over $1bn per 1Km of length. Therefore with the Megalit structures of (4 x 40Km) = 160Km, we have a potential resource value of roughly $160 bn. Nice and easy to remember a Megalit valuation of roughly $1bn per 1Km, but still only guesswork at this stage. The foregoing valuations are only my opinion and may be well wide of the mark with the conjecture / speculation. NOTES ON SPECULATION AND INVESTMENT etc The potential of the Megalit is based on guesswork, yes it is a big guess, but how wide of the mark is the guess? Originally I thought this was pretty ambitious however listening to Kiran Morzaria's presentation at the Investor Show where he talks about the consistency across the parallel structures, he said they could be looking at a 10mt resource, he then followed this up indicating it could possibly be the largest lithium find in the world, so it must be significant. Re the recent LV and JV#1 upgrade to 3.283 mt, if this was over 10km and we have 160km structure, in other words a 16 fold increase, this would be up beside the top Bolivia mines which have a LC resource of about 47mt. So perhaps the 16 fold increase in the LCE resource is not actually that far off the mark. Food for thought and no wonder REM’s DL said he had been waiting 30 years for this and they keep saying it is going to be big. Anyway there is no question that the value of the Sonora concessions are worth significantly more than the current resource value and perhaps it will not be long before a big name / miner snaps up a fantastic and profitable resource at a very cheap price. Hope not just yet. Most probably if it happens, it will happen before REM / BCN completely define the size and value of the large Megalit concession; otherwise the miner / buyer will have to pay us a heck lot more. In the meantime on with progress and further exploration. The only problem I envisage with the exploration is the timescales involved in drilling to prove the extent of the resource. Of course there is nothing to stop them increasing the number of drill rigs deployed. Also once the requisite studies have been undertaken they may decide to commence mining as early as they can, if that was the chosen path, so they can commence production whilst continuing to delineate the concessions. Logically, it is most probable that a contract will be signed with a big name and with an upfront payment that will permit production to commence simultaneously with the huge Megalit exploration continuing for a number of years to come. In due course the on going mapping, trenching and sampling may reveal other lithium bearing finds. They can obviously select their business strategy to maximize the returns on the path they pursue. Regarding pre production, BCN have already commenced engineering design work to scope and design a lithium carbonate plant with the capacity for 35,000 tonnes to 50,000 tones per year of lithium carbonate. Retaining the 12.19% interest in BCN, or increasing this, along with the 2.2% share in WLC will certainly provide useful returns in the future and these are currently worth about $9.17m and $1.26m, a total of $10.43m, handy if REM need the cash. Again repeating myself, the foregoing is purely speculation on the future resource value and is an attempt at valuating what the concessions are potentially worth at this point in time until it is drilled. This is a biggie but the question is how big? If it is not wide of the mark and we can assess with some degree of accuracy all associated future costs involved and we proceeded to mine it, what would the BCN and REM share prices actually be worth in the market place in the future? Section 3 takes a stab at estimating the share price from the NAV / NPV. Needless to say the foregoing highlights the massive potential of BCN as an investment opportunity and it is not surprising that REM have increased their interest in BCN. It is understandable though that REM have sensibly chosen to buy shares whilst they are cheap, now they have exercised the ‘Earn In' option to increase to 30% of JV#2 the likelihood is that this will be REM’s last option to purchase a cheap interest in BCN. It is also interesting to note that whilst the REM and BCN are on the up the WLC share price remained pretty flat until Tesla announced their interest. So why are REM buying an interest in BCN? to get the increased revenue benefit once producing? to achieve a leverage strategy and go for a merger or takeover? to get a seat on the BCN board? to attain an eventual controlling interest in the JV's or even BCN.? REM and BCN must have a strategy in place, but then we are not party to the undisclosed information and negotiations which must have been taken place now they have battery grade samples that can be assessed / tested by potential customers. So given that the current resource value has the potential to increase by a significant multiple and we have a huge and potentially valuable project, the question is; does the partnership mine or not. It’s looking like a yes vote to me unless one or other, or both companies receive a massive offer and REM must surely be thinking about staying invested and opting for the 49.9% interest in the concessions and if they do they may be in for the long term then. We should know by 30 September. Funding is currently available however any thoughts of raising funding through placing etc should not be seen as negative, but a necessity, in order to continue the exploration, assuming that it is warranted. BCN have now raised £4.75 million or (£4.038m) after commission expenses and REM have arranged a $10 million facility through YAGM without any real strings attached. The clear message here is that they apparently arranged funding with relative ease, whereas other exploration companies have not found this route to finance as pain free. The fact that finance can be obtained from independent financiers should prove invaluable when negotiating any pre production contracts and financial packages with potential customers. The funding should be forthcoming given the size and the potential of the resources and additionally the load will be shared 70/30 between BCN and REM. With a contract and money upfront we could bring LV and JV#1 to production, prove up part of the Megalit site and then sell parts off and realise the investment value early. Only one of a number of options open to the partnership. UPDATE –The update on the 4 holes drilled south of El Sauz indicates they are at the edge of the Lithium bearing basin as does the single hole to the east of La Ventana. They now propose a more extensive drilling program on Sonora to provide detailed open pit design information and also to expand the lithium resources into the Megalit. So it looks like the next round of drilling will be very interesting on the Megalit. The Buenavista surface sampling has returned Lithium values up to at 1700ppm in the clay sediments and this is essentially over an area 6km by 1.25km and it is part of the Megalit concession. Putting things into perspective, remember we currently have a resource of 3.283 million tones and without any more exploration this is enough LCE to supply 50,000 tonnes / year to three Tesla type or other factories for 20 years and we currently have a cheaper processing procedure which is a distinct advantage in negotiations. An estimate of the share price for the current resource on LV and JV#1 and also for the potential guesstimated resource on the Megalit is considered below. Just think of the current worth obtained from the drilling results and consider the potential worth we may have in the future given the size of the concessions and the potential value once it is drilled. Yes it is in the future as JV#2 is a huge site which will take a fair amount of time and money to define. Remember there are other projects to also consider for REM and BCN which will further enhance their value. Still trying to appreciate how large these concessions are, no wonder I never sleep. Food for thought and a little patience. Continuation of post 3. ESTIMATE OF NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) AND SHARE PRICE. The Net Present Value (NPV) and Enterprise Value (which looks at the market cap, the debt and liabilities and cash) are economic measures reflecting the market value of a whole business. Price to earnings ratios P/E are appropriate for many companies, but as mining companies have shorter lives another way to look at the valuation is to examine the NPV. I'm no expert at this but the NPV tries to take into account all of the money flows in and out over a period, say the mine life, and work back to see what the present day value is. If this is worked out and a negative figure is achieved for the NPV, then the project is not worth doing. So let's look at the Net Present Value (NPV) which attempts to value all of the projects future earnings by discounting it back to present day value. Regarding the concept of present value, what would you rather have £100 now or £100 in a years time; of course you would rather have it now as it will be worth £110 in a years time at an interest rate of 10% say. So the discount rate takes account of the value of the potential investment opportunity. A project study works out what the future project value is, now, at the present day value and discounts the figures over a period, the mine life, to allow for the potential investment which would give a return at a realistic % interest rate over the period. This discount rate includes an allowance for the degree of risk associated with the project and the discount is often set at 5% interest + 3% for risk, i.e. 8%. For the La Ventana concession BCN’ issued PEA based their NPV calculations on a LCE resource value of $6000 / t and $1958 /t operating costs over 20 years and at 35K tonnes per year (a 700k tonnes resource) and they calculated a NPV of $848m at a discount rate of 8%. The NPV was calculated for other discount rates also. They also considered a capital cost of $114million for plant, royalties of 3% and 34% tax and these are considered in the NPV estimates given below. (It is unclear if the Mexican government charges a 7.5% royalty, but BCN makes reference to this possibility and also to a 3% royalty to both CO-E and a Rio Tinto Co., and in future this would need to be incorporated in any evaluation). The indicated resource for La Ventana was 930K tonne and as at June it has increased to 1.273 mt. So with the calc based on 700Kt, a fairly large portion of the resource is unaccounted for in terms of value. If the indicated resource is accurate there is 573k tonnes remaining which is effectively another mine with 16 years at 35Kt/year. BCN are already looking at a scoping study for plant to produce a capacity between 35k to 50k tonnes per year. Uncertain of whether there is a limit to the capacity of the plant or what is practical or possible in this situation. I did some initial calculations to compare with the BCN figures. Basing the calculations on the BCN information, for La Ventana, at a discount rate of 8%, I estimated a NPV = $761 million (using what I thought they should be using for the royalty and tax figures) and with the figures they appeared to have used for the NPV, it gave a NPV of $801 million, which is still less than their £848 million value. So maybe these are conservative values for all of the NPVs estimated and referred to below. SHARE PRICE ESTIMATE BASED ON THE NPV CALCULATED BY BCN, AND BASED ON NPV ESTIMATES FOR LV, JV#1 & JV’#2. I don't think I have seen any attempts to value the project in terms of a share price estimate. I have worked out the resource value per share previously but not the share price. Anyway this is my effort as I see it and it is the end result of working out a fair number of NPV for different resource scenarios. Re the Net Asset Value (NAV) and NPV see comments at end of the section. (Essentially this assumes that the working capital, investments, and liabilities etc are small, and so the NPV is equivalent to the NAV which is used to estimate the share price). a) La Ventana - Based on BCN's calculated NPV value of $848 million for 35Kt over 20 years, gives: REM share price of 1.128p (allowing for REM's 12.19% interest in BCN) BCN share price (100% of LV) is £6.45 assuming 78,174,752 new shares. b) La Ventana - A calculation on the NPV for 36 years at 35Kt / year for a 1.26mt resource, discounted at 8%, gave a NPV = $930.3 million and results in: REM share price of 1.237p, (allowing for REM's 12.19% interest). BCN share price (100% of LV) is £7.08 assuming the new shares (78,174,752). . c) La Ventana - Using different figures on LV for a resource of 1.25mt, over 25 years at 50Kt / year, this yields an NPV = $1,264 million and gives: REM share price of 1.681p. (use for Final total as the calc. is based on top end of plant capacity of 50Kt / year). BCN share price (100% of LV) is £9.621 assuming the new shares. So if the REM share price reaches 1.68p this reflects only the La Ventana resources, or REM's share of it. Similarly for BCN if it reaches a share price of £9.62 this is only what LV is worth. d) JV#1 - With an updated resource of 2.01mt, and for a mine life of 40 years at 50Kt / year, (resource of 2mt), the calculated NPV = $1,404 million and is equivalent to: REM share price of 5.904p, including 12.19% interest in BCN. BCN share price is £7.48 assuming the new shares. So from above, based on the La Ventana (c) and JV#1 (d), both 'indicated' resources then: REM projected share price = 1.681 + 5.904 = 7.585p. BCN projected share price = £9.62 + £7.48 = £17.10 To sum these up the Share Price estimate is based on the current resource value of LV and JV#1 only and may apply in the future once the resource is fully proven and declared through the appropriate studies. But the more speculative share price for JV#2 which is based on a guesstimate is now estimated below. So not bad with still the "the biggie" to evaluate, JV#2 made up of the Megalit, Buena Vista and San Gabriel concessions. This is approx. a quarter of a million acres and has 4 trending sequences extending for a length of 40km (a strike length extending for 160Km). e) JV#2 - The drilling on the Megalit concessions has commenced and further drilling is planned. It is assumed that the 4 trending sequences are consistent and contiguous in line with what has been drilled, and they have similar Lithium concentrations, as indicated by REM. As these total 160km in length compared to the 10km already drilled on LV and JV#1, this is a 16 fold increase, so assume that the Megalit structures have a resource potential of 16 x 2.41 = 38.56mt.. But it is only guesswork at the moment. (NB drilling has updated to 3.283mt but unsure of the drilled length, so use 2.413mt (0.93 + 1.483). To estimate a NPV I have considered only one of the 4 parallel sequences / structures or in effect a mine that is one quarter of the potential resources and is equivalent to a 9.6mt resource. For a mine life of 48 years with a resource of 200K t / year, at an 8% discount, this produces a NPV = $5,751 million. This assumes, rightly or wrongly, we have processing plant with 4 x the current planned 50K t / year max capability. (This could be treated as 4 plants / mines on the sequence involving the same capital cost for each). Not sure about the practicalities on the mining plant here, other than it gets the ore out of the ground quicker and therefore helps the share price. This NPV, assuming working cap, invests. and liabilities are small, is the NAV and gives: REM a share price of 24.182p and is an estimate for only one quarter of the JV#2 concession. As indicated previously this is obviously guesswork at the resources until actually drilled, albeit we are getting a few hints at the size of the resources involved. BCN share price for one quarter of the JV’2 concession is £30.64. So if we are confident in the future that we do indeed have 4 proven parallel structures we can apply a multiplication factor of 4 to this, if not, then we can apply the appropriate factor depending on the existence of 1, 2 or 3 lithium bearing clay sequences. Therefore the REM share price assuming we have ALL 4 of the trending sequences on JV#2, would be 4 x 24.182p = 96.728p (assuming this multiple approach is reasonable, given the size of the concession). Also for all 4 sequences, the BCN share price would be 4 x £30.64 = £122.56. So summing up the REM share prices for the 3 ventures (LV, JV#1 and JV#2) we have: Total REM future share price estimate = 1.681 + 5.904 + 96.728 = 104.313 pence. For BCN a total future share price estimate = £9.62 + £7.48 + £122.56 = £ 139.66 (So 78,174,852 x £139.66 = £10917.8998 million or £10.92bn m/cap.) This is very speculative and probably a very long way in the future. For interest, if we just multiply the JV#1 estimated shares price for REM (5.904p) and BCN (£7.48) by a factor of 16 we get for the JV#2 resource: A REM share price = 94.46p and BCN share price = £119.68. I am not an expert but assuming that the methodology is ok that is my attempt to estimate the potential resource values of the concessions and valuate the share price potential. Regarding the Megalit, it of course may not be practicable to mine in the manner assumed. Also how appropriate is to try and assign a value based on scant info, but at least the guesswork approach is documented and is by no means set in clay. Everyone needs to do their own research on this, but on the face of it, it is sure to be a real biggie when the resources are fully defined. A point of interest, mining stocks have a certain amount of leverage and the stocks are often valued at 1.5 to 2.5 times their NAV. One factor is the price of the commodity and any potential increase in the LCE price would add leverage to the value of the mining. For example assuming the operating costs stay the same ($2,000), an increase from $6000 to $7,000 / t which is an increase of 16.7% would increase the resource value and corresponding profit margins from $4K / t to $5K / t or by 25%. Therefore in the future a £1 share would be likely to re rate to £1.25 with the ore price increase. Of course any future valuation depends entirely on the strategy that BCN and REN adopt with regards to further exploration now they have access to a substantial amount of funding. Will they have a short, medium or long term viewpoint? DL said it would possibly be sold in 2 years, but will it and will REM remain in the venture until at least they start to mine. Any guesses? Remember and do your own research, as this is only my take on the current value, the potential value and where the share price is potentially going. However remember the price of a resource in the ground will always be a lot less that any prediction or estimation. BACKGROUND NOTES ON THE VALUATION. (Info) It is hard to take a company which is not producing and look at it objectively with a view to assessing if it is currently a good investment for others. It is easier when it is only for your own use, but nevertheless the exploration process still has to be done. In the first instance it is hard to evaluate an exploration company when they are not producing, but by their very nature miners tend to be speculative buys, that is until the ground drilling and later feasibility and bankable studies are undertaken that indicate otherwise. Until this happens the Miners are often valued at levels well below the in ground value as they have no real resource identification. But rather than adopt the attitude that, as they are not producing, they are therefore not worth anything, perhaps it is worthy to at least attempt to assign a value on the share price, even if it is speculative due to the lack of exploration results. It may at least indicate that the company is progressing reasonably well with what has been explored and as the resources are slowly defined, or otherwise, a valuation update can be adjusted or re-estimated according to each set of assay results returned. So if they define across different areas we can add them all up to obtain a current valuation for the project based on their NPVs. So this was all about attempting to attach some sort of potential value to the share price for BCN and REM. In the Current Valuation section the LV and JV#1 exploration are advancing and are at an 'indicated' resource stage with just over 10km drilled. However remember we are not as far advanced in JV#2 and it was only my take on a guesstimate on the resource until it is drilled and defined and only when we achieve ‘measured' and ‘reserve' grade categories are we heading towards real value. The more we define the resources, the more we increase our valuation and potential price /worth to any possible buyers. Note also in the Potential Value section it refers to the resource value per share and not the share price. My effort to value the share price was covered above in this NPV section. Notes / comments on the NPV and NAV with regards to the above estimates: The NAV = aggregated NPVs + Working Capital + Investments + Hedgebook value - Liabilities. For example, assume REM is fully costed for 2014 and that as they have working capital of £5m, there are no liabilities. Also any increase in cash due to draw down from the $10m YAGM facility they have available e.g. $3m, is cancelled by an increase in the corresponding liabilities. Assume BCN investment is included in NPV and estimate REM's 2.2% investment in WL is approx $1.3m (£0.775m). Value of Hedge book is zero. (as unknown). Then NAV = aggregate of NPV + £5.0m + £0.775m + 0 - 0 = NPV's + £5.775m So a valuation of £100m for the NPV will only increase the NAV by 5.77%. Therefore as the working capital and investments are low (as far as I know) compared to the NPV, the share price will only be slightly higher based on the NAV, hence the share price calculations above have been estimated using the NPV only. Continuation of post. 4. ESTIMATE ON THE VALUE OF NEODYMIUM OXIDE RESOURCE AT YANGIBANA AND A ROUGH ESTMATE OF THE VALUATION OF THE TREOs (from a previous exploration) This is based on the RNS issued on 5th August, and calcs. the value of the Yangibana Neodymium oxide resource, however as the total TREO list was not supplied an attempt was made to value the TREOs based on the ppm as listed in the previously explored information on the Hastings’s website. Yangibana - Neodymium value from the 5th August JORC. There are 1.86 mt ‘indicatedR17; TREOs at 1.38% and 1.5 mt ‘inferred̵7; at 1.29% which is equivalent to 45.018 million Kg. For the Neodymium we have: Total in tonnes = 3.36 million tonnes Total in Kg = 3360 million kg Neodymium oxide = 2700 ppm or 0.27% of Nd(2)O(3) Neodymium amount = 9.072 million Kg Price is $68/Kg = $616.896 million USD REM share is 30% = $185.0688 million USD REM share in £ = £110.115936 million GBP Shares (million) = 5453.375717 Resource value/sh = 2.019 pence So in terms of the resource value per share the Neodymium alone is worth 2p. If the rest of the TREOs are priced the same we have about 5 times this resource value, but overall they are possibly less in price. A list of the elements is not given in the recent update; however a check can be made on the previous exploration information on the Hastings website which lists the TREOs and ppm. So just for interest and an attempt to value all of the TREOs, I will use the info as given in Hastings Previous Exploration albeit it is old data. This lists the TREOs and their ppm and has a resource tonnage of 3.5 million tonnes. Based on this table and TREO prices at 14/8/2014 from ‘mineralprices.com’ the calculation yields the following resource valuation: Yangibana TREOs are worth a total of $2,258.039 million and REM’s 30% share is worth $677.4117 million or £403.06 million giving a total resource value per share of 7.39 pence. (but based on previous exploration data). So from this, it is not just the Neodymium, (which is used for magnets and electronic components), that will add value to the Yangibana project . Other highlights indicated that the upgraded resource covers only 825 metres of strike length to a maximum 400 metres down-dip to a maximum vertical depth of 100 metres below surface. The resource remains open in all directions with mineralisation cropping out to the east and west. The work is to continue in September with additional reverse circulation and diamond drilling to commence in Q4 on neighbouring targets within the 550 Sq km tenements at Yangibana. Also note that Metallurgical work will commence in the near future to determine the potential to recover the target mineralization within the deposit but preliminary studies suggest there is a potential to produce saleable products. I notice that they have also completed a scoping study to confirm the economics of the project. So on top of the previously calculated resource values for Sonora, we have an additional resource value per share of 7.4 pence for the TREOs. The likelihood is the resources and resource values of both projects will increase with time as exploration advances and the resources are defined. 5. SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS A. Current Resources for LV and JV#1 i) We have a resource for LV of 1.273mt, after costs worth $5.728bn. ii) We also have a resource for JV#1 of 2.01mt after costs worth $9.045bn. iii) A total resource for LV & JV#1 concessions of 3.283mt, worth $14.773bn. iv) From these REM resource worth is $4.183bn and BCN is worth $12.06bn. v) From this REM has a resource value per share of 45.64p and BCN resource value per share is £91.79. B. Potential resource for JV#2 (the Megalit, Buena Vista and San Gabriel) i) Potential resource is approx 16 times the 2.41mt (LV and JV#1 resource) which is 38.5mt (based on guesswork and in the future). ii) At $6500-$2000 = $ 4500/tonne, this is worth £173.5bn. iii) BCN 70% resource is worth $121.5bn or £72.293bn GBP. iv) REM 30% resource is worth $52bn or £31bn. v) REM resource including 12.19% interest in BCN is worth $66.81bn or £39.73bn. C. Combined current and potential resources i) For LV, JV#1 and JV#2, the resource is 41.8433mt and worth $173.5 + $14.773 = $188.273bn. ii) REM is worth $4.183 + $66.811 = $70.994bn. iii) BCN is worth $12.06bn + $121.5bn = $133.56bn. i.e. almost twice REM and REM have 5453.4 million shares whilst BCN have 78.175 milllion (New) shares. D. Future share price estimate from NPV. (w/cap, invest. and liabilities etc, low cf NPV, so assumes NPV = NAV) i) LV - For REM interest in BCN, using BCN's NPV of $848m, the share price is 1.128p. BCN share price is £6.45. ii) LV - For REM interest in BCN using NPV of $1264m, the share price is 1.681p. BCN share price is £9.62. iii) JV#1 - For REM interest (38.533%) using $1404m, the share price is 5.904p. BCN share price is £7.48. iv) LV and JV#1 for REM the combined share price is 1.681 + 5.904 = 7.585p. BCN combined share price is £9.62 + $7.48 = £ 17.10. v) JV#2 - For REM the share price is 96.728p but guesswork and needs to be drilled fully. BCN share price is £122.56. vi) From the total for the 3 concessions, the REM share price is 1.681 + 5.904 + 96.728 = 104.313 pence. For BCN the combined share price is £9.62 + £7.48 + £122.56 = £139.66. E. Yangibana - Estimate of the Neodymium Oxide and TREO valuation (Previous exploration results) i) Neodymium resource 3.36mt at 2700ppm is worth $616.9m USD and REM’s share is £110m GBP with a resource value of 2.02p per share. ii) TREOs total resources are valued at $2.2258bn and REM’s share is worth £403m GBP with a resource value per share of 7.4p. F. BCN’s Magdalena Borate Resource i) BCN calculated a NPV of $113m USD, which on the same basis as the previous NPV/NAV calcs, would roughly equate to a share price in the region of 86p. Remember the potential resources on the Megalit (JV#2) are based on guesswork and need to be fully defined in the future. Also the current indicated resources for LV and JV#1 require upgrading through the relevant studies to declare an ore reserve. LV has had a PEA. Food for thought and just think we have not considered the mud byproduct from the clay for drilling purposes, or any of the other mineral elements that are in the Sonora ground; not to mention the possible resources at Yangibana and Greenland, all still to come and these too are likely to expand in size. Please DYOR. GLA Gil
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
Bacanora Lithium share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
BCN
Bacanora L..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200922 07:50:02