ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

APAX Apax Global Alpha Limited

136.00
-1.00 (-0.73%)
24 Jan 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Apax Global Alpha Limited APAX London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
-1.00 -0.73% 136.00 16:22:17
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
137.00 136.00 137.00 136.00 137.00
more quote information »
Industry Sector
EQUITY INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS

Apax Global Alpha APAX Dividends History

Announcement Date Type Currency Dividend Amount Ex Date Record Date Payment Date
05/09/2024InterimGBP0.05512/09/202413/09/202403/10/2024
05/03/2024FinalGBP0.056414/03/202415/03/202404/04/2024
06/09/2023InterimGBP0.05714/09/202315/09/202303/10/2023
02/03/2023FinalGBP0.058209/03/202310/03/202303/04/2023
19/08/2022InterimGBP0.0601/09/202202/09/202223/09/2022
02/03/2022FinalGBP0.063610/03/202211/03/202204/04/2022
19/08/2021InterimGBP0.059726/08/202127/08/202117/09/2021
02/03/2021FinalGBP0.052811/03/202112/03/202101/04/2021
25/08/2020InterimGBP0.048703/09/202004/09/202025/09/2020
03/03/2020FinalGBP0.046812/03/202013/03/202003/04/2020

Top Dividend Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 24/12/2024 23:10 by speedsgh
Write up on #APAX by Oak Bloke
Posted at 27/11/2024 17:33 by speedsgh
Apax carves out S&W accountants from Evelyn wealth managers -

Apax Global Alpha contributes £23.4m of a reported £700m price tag for Smith & Williamson, the accountancy arm spinning off from Evelyn Partners...
Posted at 27/11/2024 08:33 by speedsgh
Apax Funds to acquire Evelyn Partners -
Posted at 22/11/2024 08:11 by speedsgh
@Mister MD - That's because actions speak louder than words and the APAX buyback programme is being implemented in such a half-hearted manner that it is unlikely to have any meaningful effect.

The first buyback was undertaken on 27 June. The terms of the programme are as voted for at the most recent AGM (1/5/24) and limit buybacks to 14.99% of the Company's issued capital (73,616,005 shares). The Distribution Pool which earmarks funds available for buybacks was seeded with EUR 30m.

To date APAX have bought back 2,136,021 shares (at a cost of approx EUR 3.67m) which represents just 2.90% of the maximum 73m+ shares that can be purchased. That is since 27 June, so over nearly 5 months.

Purchases are being undertaken by Jefferies independent of the company but within parameters set by the company in the agreement with Jefferies. AFAIAA these parameters have not been disclosed to shareholders but are likely the reason behind the scheme's relative ineffectiveness.

To be fair, it should also be noted that many other trusts/companies have been buying back shares over the same period and even in cases where buyback programmes have been implemented more rigourously, it has tended to have limited effect on the share price.
Posted at 23/10/2024 09:55 by craigso
@makinbucks There are different kinds of PE strategies. Not all of them require "significantly grow revenue and EBITDA" or indeed high levels of debt.

What shouldn't be a debate is that an investment trust is required to distribute a high % of the income it declares - I believe it's 85%. So if Apax is making capital gains and receiving dividends, then these must be mostly distributed to shareholders. That doesn't preclude an IT from having uncovered dividends, but even then that's a sign of confidence as no company or IT wants to reduce dividends.

And for a fund targetting mid-teens returns, a 8% "natural yield" is certainly the minimum to be expected from a mature, cash-generating portfolio.
Posted at 22/10/2024 09:37 by makinbuks
craigso, I think that is misguided. PE investors look for companies that can significantly grow revenue and EBITA. To allow that to happen they gear the investee companies. Cash flow generated services the debt and funds the growth, dividends restrict the growth opportunity. After a period of growth the PE investor sells the asset for a capital gain. If a PE IT is paying a dividend it is doing so to smooth the distribution of the capital gains. Whether this is good practice or not is a debate.

Apax is different, unique in fact, in that alongside the PE it has the debt and equity
derivatives portfolio which is there to provide liquidity and income. That gives it a natural yield which other PE IT's don't have but lets not kid ourselves that there is an 8% natural yield
Posted at 18/10/2024 10:44 by parob
Another I've been watching for a while and bought in today. Think we will see quite a move once we break the downtrend and happy to receive the very attractive dividend in the meantime :)
Posted at 17/10/2024 16:15 by spectoacc
Very interesting, thanks. They could be sat on it for a long time tho, APAX been a serial underperformer.
Posted at 17/10/2024 16:10 by speedsgh
"That’s left them [APAX] on a 33% discount to their net asset value of 213p in June, which has ‘disappointed’ long-standing backer James Hart. As the former investment director of Witan Investment Trust, Hart admired Apax Partners and took a cornerstone stake when the investment company floated.

Following Witan’s merger this month with rival Alliance Trust, Hart has joined its fund manager Willis Towers Watson. The 5% stake in Apax has transferred to the now £5bn Alliance Witan (ALW) and although it does not fit its investment strategy, Hart said it ‘will not be sold until we have realised full value for Alliance Witan shareholders.’

That’s good for Apax. If Alliance Witan is not a forced seller, it should remove any ‘overhang̵7; weighing on the shares."
Posted at 26/6/2024 15:59 by speedsgh
I have to agree with you, @ItO. Prioritising the buybacks at a time when the discount remains so stubbornly wide seems sensible to me. And the level of the new absolute dividend (11p) is sufficiently attractive to keep income investors (or growth investors looking for an attractive income alongside) interested & invested here imo. There is nothing to stop them from reverting to the previous dividend policy once the situation has reversed and the discount narrowed to more normal levels, although I accpet that they may just decide to retain the absolute dividend with the possibility of supplementing it with special dividends rather than going back to a dividend as a specific percentage of NAV. They are prely adapting to a changing/changed situation and realigning priorities AFAICS. The only criticism I might make is that they might have done this sooner. AIMHO

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock