We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anglesey Mining Plc | AYM | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 1.40 | 08:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| MINING |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 09/4/2024 22:59 by buttyboy Kooba; we seem to be going around in never ending circles. Retail investors are like sheep; that well trodden path to new and higher pastures (reminiscent of good company news) and that even more trodden path on the way back down (reminiscent of no news or delayed news). Retail, we love them, we hate them but they give us liquidity (at a cost if we don't play ball)."Me apply"? I'm not the CEO type ... leave it to the professionals ! Now its late, must get my teddy bear and go to bed!! |
Posted at 26/2/2024 13:39 by j5thumbs Calmtrader. Alan Green’s opinions seem to pop up quite frequently on this thread (as in the above post). His professional role for various small cap mining companies is described as Brand Communicator, or Public and Investor Relations, ie: P.R.Is he paid or rewarded in some way by AYM for promoting their shares; if this is so, should we really be taking his pronouncements seriously ? |
Posted at 15/2/2024 18:01 by j5thumbs Kooba, no, I didn’t miss all that. But the activity recently has been so pronounced that it’s hard to keep up with the current stockholding position by institutional investors such as Juno used to be. So Kearney bought out Juno’s entire stake ? Sounds like boardroom revolts come a bit easier than shareholder revolts. :o( |
Posted at 21/1/2024 10:26 by kennyp52 I don’t know what is worse .. the ramper who posts only positives and potentially tries to draw more unsuspecting investors in .. or the deramper who relies on posting the facts for people to make up their own mind. I think if you follow the latter you will maybe be more successful investing in miners .. oops .. I mean explorers . No revenue and reliant on trying to get positive RNS out there to draw in investors for further placings . Rinse and repeat . How many shares will they have in issue before they can even look at financing a mine build ? Meanwhile the directors keep getting their money . Totally risky punt if you get into non revenue black holes like these AIM shares . |
Posted at 12/1/2024 08:35 by kennyp52 All the usual noises to try and pump the share price up for a placing imho . How much capital will be needed to do a full PFS let alone build a mine ? If they lose the confidence that investors see placings are primarily for paying wages ( like they have been for years ) then they will struggle to raise and it goes nowhere. All imho . |
Posted at 03/1/2024 14:32 by trader465 What do you mean by “very good”?Battershill ramping it into the next placing like he did at salt lake potash before investors lost 100% and directors banked the money? Rinse and repeat? |
Posted at 01/1/2024 14:06 by trader465 Happy new year all….AYM investors could well be disappointed with increasing negative news flows and placings |
Posted at 01/1/2024 12:20 by wisteria2 Happy new year all.... AYM investors could well be delighted in 2024 with increasing positive news flow on all fronts... |
Posted at 27/12/2023 06:14 by mininglamp I really think Anglesey will be a winner for investors in 2024, sentiment towards the company has never been higher since the analyst visit, 6p/7p a share for Parys Mountain alone right now they suggest.News on multiple fronts expected also. |
Posted at 11/2/2023 05:09 by trader465 If company XYZ has 100 shares in issue, then issues another 100 shares, the original shares are worth half their value, ie a 50% loss of shareholder value to original investors. As the value of each share falls, each placing requires a greater number of shares to be issued to raise the same amount of capital. If original investors allow loss of shareholder value to compound with each placing, it becomes very difficult, and sometimes impossible to recover to the original value of capital invested.A 50% loss of shareholder value needs a 100% gain in share price just for original investors to remain at a standstill. (We are now at this point) A 75% loss of shareholder value needs a 300% gain in share price just for original investors to remain at a standstill. A 87.5% loss of shareholder value needs a 700% gain in share price just for original invests to remain at a standstill. A 93.7% loss of shareholder value needs a 1500% gain in share price just for original investors to remain at standstill. The above shows if company XYZ issues 100% of “original̶ In reality the gain needed to recover capital would be far greater than a 15 bagger due to the compounding effect on the loss, as the value of each share falls, each issuance requires a greater number of shares to be issued in order to raise the same amount of capital, which usually results in investors never being able to recover the original capital invested. In 2 years AYM shares in issue have almost doubled (up 75%) this is the reason we have seen the value of the shares fall by 50% and why we need more speed in progressing the development of our assets and less dragging of the feet by management. Time costs money. If delays are allowed to continue shares in issue will compound, and losses to investors will compound to an unrecoverable position. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
