ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

AYM Anglesey Mining Plc

0.675
0.00 (0.00%)
23 Jan 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Anglesey Mining Investors - AYM

Anglesey Mining Investors - AYM

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Anglesey Mining Plc AYM London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 0.675 00:00:00
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
0.675
more quote information »
Industry Sector
MINING

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 22/1/2025 12:17 by determined
butty,


Management can't just dream up "news" to satisfy investors.

This company has ground along at less than a snail's pace for 30 or so years, and will continue to do so for another 30 if investors keep supporting it, which it seems they will at ever deceasing prices in a death spiral.


Why would anyone remain here when producing gold mines are shooting up in value daily as the gold price hikes?

IF (and it's a huge IF) AYM ever starts to generate positive news and actually moves toward production there will be plenty of opportunities to buy back in.

Surely that's better than simply funding the director's ifestyle and watching your own money fritter away due to the number of placings at lower and lower prices?
Posted at 22/1/2025 10:17 by kennyp52
I honestly think this is one to avoid now Buttyboy .. the placings have diluted so much that the share in issue now are ridiculous and what have investors ever got back for that money .. a series of failed CEO’S taking money for next to nothing . It just looks like a scam now imho.
Posted at 15/1/2025 09:38 by pigeons
Butty you are agreeing with everything I say. You know the same as I do that. the private investor will not get up and vote them off because they do not have the votes. This ship is now being run by a big boy in the background who's. brought different people in over the last number of years. to cloud all the issues.DElisted us so the regulators can't see what they're doing. I've seen this many times over many years. and it's time that the regulators were brought. to book Too many people incapable of doing jobs and getting paid too much In the past, you had to know what you were talking about, or prove yourself over a number of years that you were capable of keeping THERE job and do. your best for the company.
Posted at 07/1/2025 08:29 by buttyboy
It is some positive news but don't be fooled, this is going to be a long and drawn out procedure, which incidentally is somewhat expected when you have to get the approval of a council committee and sub-committees in a sensitive environmental area. My main concern is whilst all this is in the pipeline then much more cash has to be raised. If you recall to this time 12 months ago, prior to Rob Marsden's appointment, the focus was on completing the PFS by Oct last year; they didn't have enough cash then and they certainly don't have enough cash now. The share price is three-quarters of a penny and with the usual broker discount this new cash will be raised at a pittance. Sure, a backbone investor may come along either as an individual or a consortium, but I can tell you one thing for certain, they will not be doing a deal at 3p+/share.

As MiningLamp alludes to, AYM seriously needs to 'upgrade' their news flow and until this happens the stock will further devalue as retail investors will follow news flow.
Posted at 07/1/2025 07:34 by kooba
Rob Marsden, CEO of Anglesey Mining, commented: "I'm absolutely delighted that the proposed mitigations to potential environmental impacts, put forward by the Company, have been approved by Cyngor Sir Ynys Môn/Anglesey County Council. I'm grateful to the North Wales Minerals and Waste Planning Service for their diligence in forming their opinion of the scope, and for the feedback that will make this project better for all stakeholders. There are three areas where reasonable requests for enhancements to the scope have been requested and Anglesey Mining is happy to comply with those requests so that a more informed planning decision can be made.The permitting objective of Anglesey Mining remains unchanged, that is to make a planning application, that when enacted, will be seen to provide economic returns to investors, job opportunities, mitigation of the impacts to the environment and enhanced respect for, and appreciation of, the mining heritage of Parys Mountain, thus earning us a social licence to operate."
Posted at 02/1/2025 09:57 by calmtrader
So what are people hoping/expecting from AYM in 2026Me: Grangesberg monetisation. Grant on back of zinc added to critical list. Strategic investor coming onboard. Green light from the council.
Posted at 13/11/2024 15:29 by highley1
Kooba,

Parys hasn't attracted any takeovers in well over 30 years, why do you think it's different this time?

It's been a good liefestyle vehicle for management, which is nice,

On the otherhand, it's sucked in investors' money and given nothing back, and I doubt it ever will.
Posted at 06/11/2024 12:15 by highley1
butty

There's plenty of awareness, but podcasts and interviews do not a mine make.

They need access to serious funds to move it forward and I guess at best it's a marginal mine, and for that reason not attractive to potential investors at the corporate level.

So they are left doing tiny financings to keep paying salaries and expenses, and not moving it forward. Do you want to continue to fund that?



With regards to the AIM market, the number of companies is falling all the time. Many people have been burnt by the spiv brokers forward selling placings at the expense of loyal shareholders, whose shareholder value is eroded by the dilution, and have left the market as a result,in my opinion.

It has become a transfer of wealth from investors to the city spivs, and has succeeded, but they're running out of naive newbie investors to fleece, and so its getting harder to fund mainly lifestyle companies where everyone is doing very well, except the investors who are funding it all !!

I think the AIM is in danger of imploding as they run out of inexperienced investors to continue to fund lifestyle companies and the city spivs that feed off them.


92 companies have left AIM this year, and only 10 IPOs!!




I think AIM is finished, killed by city greed, and promotional CEO's of many heavily promoted lifestyle companies.
Posted at 06/10/2024 16:57 by mininglamp
It is disappointing that management never make themselves available via presentation evenings or even online forums like Investor Meet where shareholders are able to challenge them.

The new CEO seems to lack communication skills and the ability to excite investors, the only time this company promotes it's wares is through Alan 'take the money' Green.

Was the company wise to acquire a further stake in Grangesberg circa 18 months ago for example, so far it appears not, why not ?

It is also disappointing they continually resort to bucket shop broker placings when surely what is needed is some other funding route, it does look like they are trying alternative routes now but why has it taken so long ?

There are more questions than answers here HOWEVER one piece of material news and the shares will fly higher that is what long suffering shareholder are hoping for.
Posted at 11/2/2023 05:09 by trader465
If company XYZ has 100 shares in issue, then issues another 100 shares, the original shares are worth half their value, ie a 50% loss of shareholder value to original investors. As the value of each share falls, each placing requires a greater number of shares to be issued to raise the same amount of capital. If original investors allow loss of shareholder value to compound with each placing, it becomes very difficult, and sometimes impossible to recover to the original value of capital invested.

A 50% loss of shareholder value needs a 100% gain in share price just for original investors to remain at a standstill. (We are now at this point)

A 75% loss of shareholder value needs a 300% gain in share price just for original investors to remain at a standstill.

A 87.5% loss of shareholder value needs a 700% gain in share price just for original invests to remain at a standstill.

A 93.7% loss of shareholder value needs a 1500% gain in share price just for original investors to remain at standstill.

The above shows if company XYZ issues 100% of “original̶1; equity per year then after 4 years original investors need a 15 bagger just to recover original capital invested.

In reality the gain needed to recover capital would be far greater than a 15 bagger due to the compounding effect on the loss, as the value of each share falls, each issuance requires a greater number of shares to be issued in order to raise the same amount of capital, which usually results in investors never being able to recover the original capital invested.

In 2 years AYM shares in issue have almost doubled (up 75%) this is the reason we have seen the value of the shares fall by 50% and why we need more speed in progressing the development of our assets and less dragging of the feet by management. Time costs money.

If delays are allowed to continue shares in issue will compound, and losses to investors will compound to an unrecoverable position.

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock