We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anglesey Mining Plc | LSE:AYM | London | Ordinary Share | GB0000320472 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.50 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 57,176 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metal Mining Services | 0 | -961k | -0.0023 | -6.09 | 5.88M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/8/2013 11:42 | I can bring it up, but it doesn't look at well ! They use a web hosting service that has screwed up permissions before - looks like they have done it again. | noccer | |
01/8/2013 10:46 | anyone is the lim website down hxxp://www.labradori | laserdisc | |
01/8/2013 10:37 | Danesh Varma, takes over the roles of finance director and company secretary. | laserdisc | |
26/7/2013 17:11 | next lim conference call and webcast on Thursday, August 15, 2013 at 11:00 am (ET) t | laserdisc | |
26/7/2013 15:20 | "We hope that the market will recognise the inherent value in LIM which should be reflected in the Anglesey share price." If the Chairman finds himself wishing and hoping then that is an indicator that he doesn't know what he's doing. | eriktherock | |
26/7/2013 10:10 | chinese railway investment my understanding is that only a third of budget spending has been used to date on the railways as per peoples china daily ie due to seasonal factors , spending to pick up in this 1/4 hxxp://europe.chinad iron ore at the $132 level which all helps the monthly average for lim | laserdisc | |
26/7/2013 06:42 | Al - the LIM investment is currently valued at around 8million and the mcap of AYM is only 10mil. So it is a big part. | georgethefourth | |
26/7/2013 00:46 | Why do we still talk about LIM on this thread, AYM only have a 15% share stake in that company. Can anyone suggest any reason for buying AYM if they want to invest in LIM, when they could buy LIM directly. AYM is not suppose to be an investment company! It should be focused on it's core business, which in value terms is now it's mineral deposits in Anglesey. | hyper al | |
26/7/2013 00:05 | This makes a change from the usual doom and gloom for iron ore. | noccer | |
25/7/2013 20:38 | 5% move in lim this evening lets hope the trend continues a parity with nml would be nice hxxp://www.i3investo | laserdisc | |
25/7/2013 13:06 | over on iii eric reckons this is lims ship for the 5th cargo 03-août 12:00 CAPE ALTHEA I.O.C.2 2 I.O.C. 1C 175 000 LIM SINTER FINES | laserdisc | |
25/7/2013 13:00 | have these sold out showing on the digital i site Gartmore Investment 5,200,000 £318,500 | laserdisc | |
25/7/2013 12:11 | only a guess that 2000 but the co website states july 2012 Number of shareholders: ~1,680 with ian leaving looking likely now we all have more shares than the directors despite them having options i thought jk was holding shares but he seems to have only options notice the spread now about 4% few weeks ago hit 16% that may encourage trades | laserdisc | |
25/7/2013 02:09 | Not sure about 'individual shareholders' being something you can count. Surely from trading houses you only get the aggregate and not how many individuals - or have you tapped into some other source of info ? All but one of my holdings are via intermediaries. Can't understand why LIM share price is nailed down when LIM should be making $20+ per tonne. Maybe the usual commodity/mining investors are waiting in the wings (or on holiday) until they see a really positive signal for a demand rally. I think FXPO is the only pure iron ore play on the FTSE and it has moved up about 20%, but still lacks lustre. LIM lacks any sign of life, maybe when they report some real money coming in then it may tick up, but I think those sorts of investors are just staying away for now. | noccer | |
24/7/2013 12:03 | no more than 2000 individual shareholders hope its not taken private & broken up say another 15% off the share price and possibly opens up possibilities back in 2011 Juno Limited 57,924,248 36.6% Passport Special Opportunities Master Fund 26,525,000 16.7% originally passport had around 42m shares who owns that lot now no one knows | laserdisc | |
24/7/2013 11:55 | laserdisc Parys is worth a lot more than £14m if they get the ore out. Even at £14m it shows that the BoD's prioritys are at odds with the reality that Parys is 100% owned by the company. I would suggest it better that they concentrate on the core asset rather than a 15% share investment in a company across the water. Are there problems with developing Parys which have not been talked about? was it Western that backed off after due diligence, the suggestion was commodity prices, but was it just that? Why are the BoD giving Parys low priority? LSE rules require that major share holders are displayed on the company website. So what is shown on the company wed site should be correct. "Juno Limited 57,924,248 shares 36.1% of voting rights" That's it, so who holds the other shares? | hyper al | |
24/7/2013 11:42 | hyper al Parys has far greater value yes parys in accounts valued at 14m if it was sold maybe get 7m & if lim shares were sold gradually in open market which they can be another 7m MARKET CAP TODAY 10M most of the directors share options now out of money jk has some at 4.3p still needs more sellers to get the price down further & that does not seem to be happening who is holding all the issued shares ? as no major shareholders other than Juno shown in the accounts. where would all the millions of shares passport disposed of over the last 2 years now be registered surely not with private investors | laserdisc | |
24/7/2013 11:41 | Wolf Minerals (WLFE) is opening a large mine in Devon, why can't AYM do the same in Wales. Yep it needs a lot of hard work and the concentrated effort from the BoD, who did do an excellent job in Labrador, but they need to refocus on AYM, now LIM is worth so little. Non-ferrous commodity prices are not that low if you look at long term charts, why wait for iron prices to improve in a company we only have a 15% stake in! WLFE has the 2nd/3rd biggest Tungsten reserve in the World! and they have all the funds in place for the mine, plus support from local people (much like AYM in Anglesey). | hyper al | |
24/7/2013 09:29 | diesel We all know that this industry is risky and often high prices drop back. We just need to see the impact of zinc prices on getting Parys up and running, just as they are about to drive into the zinc bezring white rock, the price drops back. I don't think the BoD can cope with both operations, todays report states: "Our strategy therefore is to weather the current turbulent times, to retain cash where possible, to maintain our holding in Labrador Iron which today has a market value of almost GBP7 million and to leave ourselves ready and able to move forward when metal prices and capital markets return to more positive territory." The trouble with the above comment is they lump Iron with non-ferrous metals. Why do we need to wait for Iron Ore to get stronger, AYM's main asset is a copper/lead/zinc deposit 5 Year copper price looks good hxxp://www.kitconet. Iron ore prices appear to follow roughly the same trends If they sold the £7m stake in LIM, they could move forward with AYM and make sure everything is in place for the next upturn in Zinc prices or even just continue the drive into the white rock, which they started and take whatever they can for the zinc. Why did they stop that drive? the company suggested a drop in zinc, but now they have come back to Parys they have moved back to the shaft again for access. Is the white rock so hard it can't be worked? Once they get down to to engine zone then they are on their way. I'm sure they could get grants towards the CAPEX for port facilities. I consider Parys to be worth more than £7m so for this reason that is what the BoD should be spending their time on. Wolf (WLFE) can get all the funding for a Tungsten mine in Devon, so why can't our BoD get working on Parys and drop LIM. Investors in LIM can invest direct, it makes little sense to invest in AYM for jut a 15% in LIM when Parys has far greater value. | hyper al | |
24/7/2013 09:14 | We are going to need the zinc - in tandem with the IO. Just you see. | squirrel888 | |
24/7/2013 09:03 | HA, re last sentence, I think that was their plan, they subscribed to more shares in LIM at the last placing $1 if I remember correctly. To be fair, They did get close to it all turning out just fine, a very fast start up of operations just happened to correspond to a sudden slump in IO price. Had the price remaind at current levels or above LIM would have looked a totally different business, and perhaps then the funding of AYM would have been simple. | diesel | |
24/7/2013 09:00 | We'd need to get back to a state of TRUE supply and demand. How can we measure supply and demand when all this stockpiling has been going on. Add to that - many Chinese warehouses were supposed to be FULL of stocks and are in fact empty. So when tshtf - the truth will be realised in terms of pricing. We have empty gold vaults, empty silver vaults, we have a pre-determined shortage in zinc and the house of cards has collapsed on the banks & warehouse owners - who have effectively lied. When mines can sell in to the market at REAL demand terms - watch everyone's socks getting blown off. It could well be about getting the timing right for Parry's - all is not lost. | squirrel888 | |
24/7/2013 08:46 | but the reason for the fall since yesterday is not the metals price it is the fact that even if there is a recovery the commodities of Parys, there is no sense that the management are any nearer mining the stuff out of the ground! | diesel | |
24/7/2013 08:40 | Then there's the multiple warehouse fees - which may now be curtailed - since it is deemed to be corrupt. The banks at large again! | squirrel888 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions