 I've obviously come to the wrong thread. Has the link been changed for the Altyn thread. So if this is the climate change thread here we go(TIC).
Louie. One thing the conflicted climate change scientists don't calculate is the volume of ice is greater than the volume of water.
Likewise they don't calculate resource use, as for every barrel of oil, every tonne of copper etc., every tonne of granite, or water extracted, it leaves a void, hence the number of sinkholes occurring.
According to Einstein's Theory of Super Relativity no matter can be created or destroyed. Mind you we now know that theory is incorrect with regards to the speed of light, because of quantum physics where quantum entanglement at a distance is simultaneous, whatever the distance.
Climate changes, always has occurred and even the polarity of the earth changes. Otherwise please explain why in Scotland we have fossil remains of hippos, and animals normally associated with Africa, but also have fossil remains of woolly mammoths and animals associated with arctic conditions.
The famous 'hockey stick' used in many graphs, was made rather dubious, when it was not substantiated in court.
Likewise near me, we have climate monitoring devices placed in the most ridiculous locations. The centre of a traffic island, where obviously it will be warmer and that's by no means an exception.
Some years ago the CIA issued a report concerned at the possibility it would not have enough oil to fight/defend the USA, and its no coincidence that many of the world's wars and many of the sanctioned countries have been those with high reserves of resources.
Even Iraq, where Saddam was originally embraced by the West, soon saw the wrath when
he suggested moving away from dollars. Same with Libya, Venezuela, etc. etc.
Probably explains the rush to renewables more than climate alone, especially when things like EVs were never resource costed, and why we find we need £20,000,000,000 in the UK just to upgrade the grid, why we require approx. £15,000,000,000 to install charging infrastructure, why we pay turbine owners millions NOT to produce, why so many acres of perfectly good agricultural land are then utilised for solar farms and turbines, whilst politicians and farmers talk about safeguarding the UK food supply.
we find EV's just as an example require around 132lb of copper as opposed to 52lb in non ev, where the EV's weight is so extreme we have to close off some parking spaces in high rise car parks. Where also the heavy batteries are not as suggested widely recycled and at present provide a toxic explosive mix if water penetrates the extra titanium battery cover and where another irony is much more plastics being utilised to try to keep the weight down.
Then we have engineers deliberately giving out false information, or just not explaining that at every transition there is an energy loss, so EV manufactures may rightly claim the EV is 95% efficient, excluding of course the losses at every transition at every storage level and where the greatest irony at present is that EVERY EV now requires burning MORE FOSSIL FUELS to generate the electricity. This is fact not fiction, because on a good day we only produce around 56% renewables, so we can't even power our existing energy requirements, so the rush to EV's and even Heat pumps is premature at best, or deliberate misinformation at worst, because until/unless we could guarantee 100% renewable energy for not just existing use but the wholesale transition of the 41,700,000 vehicles in the UK it completely defeats the argument on climate change concerns.
We have probably the most expensive energy in the world, after repeated comments from politicians such as the greens and Labour about cheap renewable energy, and where ordinary residential customers have been shafted having costs foisted upon standing charges, unit costs, which carry the costs of failed energy suppliers, green levies and so much more where governments try to hide the fact they had not calculated true resource costs.
Do we need to clean up the planet. Certainly we do and that should carry more emphasis than the doom-orb climate change lobby very much fanned by those employed to do that, and why I suggest we have a young population so mentally ill, frightened silly about the future. |
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
Hot Features
Premium
