We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobox | ARX | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.47 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | 0.47 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 27/2/2014 09:29 by lucky_punter Arc Exploration finds gold-copper-molybdenBy Proactive Investors Arc Exploration's (ASX: ARX) rock chip sampling from initial benching at the Singgahan Prospect of its Trenggalek Project in East Java, Indonesia, has highlighted a broad zone of anomalous gold-copper-molybden Results include 140 metres at 0.045ppm gold, 386ppm copper and 4ppm molybdenum as well as 100 metres at 0.063ppm gold, 276ppm copper and 5ppm molybdenum. |
Posted at 12/1/2009 09:36 by ianbrewster JasI seem to remember reading somewhere that AIM stocks never appear on the list - only main market shares. If you want to claim the loss on ARX, I believe that it needs to be agreed with your tax inspector. Alternative is to put it through at £0 on the CGT forms (with appropriate notes on the calculation sheet) and see what happens. |
Posted at 12/1/2009 09:12 by jaspoland Anyone know if I can claim ARX as a tax loss yet on my tax return. ARX does not appear on the following list yet.If you can what dates and prices can I use. Thanks in advance |
Posted at 24/4/2008 09:07 by dell314 buywell2 - LOL!So you've got a new name now, eh, biswell? I'm sure the ARX chaps will be pleased that you've dropped by to massage your ego.... Rgds dell |
Posted at 24/4/2008 08:40 by buywell2 Should have listened to this guy on another ARX threadbiswell - 4 Jul'06 - 12:18 - 28125 of 28134 For bridgar's benefit RTD up today , and up circa 30% since i recommended it on here It is now the subject of a bidding war .... 200p plus is my take Like 4p on ARX was months back when it was aroind 6.5p B biswell - 4 Jul'06 - 16:24 - 28126 of 28134 This load of tosh will belong to it's last lender within 18 months Silly them B biswell - 6 Jul'06 - 14:00 - 28127 of 28134 I did say 4p was coming when this was 6.5p New call whilst still trading 2p B biswell - 21 Jul'06 - 16:07 - 28128 of 28134 ARX have a deal/arrangement with Watermark do they not ? One of advfn top losers today UK smallcap opening - Watermark plunges as finance talks end, forecast slashed LONDON (AFX) - Shares in Watermark were out of favour, plunging 28-1/2 pence to 79-1/2 following news that the company, which provides in-flight products and services to the airline industry, has terminated talks with potential providers of private equity finance and slashed its full-year profit prediction by 2.7 mln stg to around 3.1 mln. daveelectec - 21 Jul'06 - 16:21 - 28129 of 28134 That sounds like another nail in the lid to me ! biswell - 21 Jul'06 - 17:55 - 28130 of 28134 Oh dear look what Watermark said yesterday in a RNS 'Following recent discussions with potential providers of private equity, these revenue streams have been downgraded by a further #0.6m and expected income derived from the sale of cargo containers has been downgraded by #0.4m. ' B rosemarydoyle - 24 Jul'06 - 07:15 - 28131 of 28134 A week to cheer you all up. biswell - 24 Jul'06 - 11:35 - 28132 of 28134 Post removed by ADVFN |
Posted at 05/2/2008 16:15 by segilla When a Co goes bust, eventually the shares end up on the Shares of Negligible Value list, meaning they can be included in CGT calcs. I expect ARX to join them. But List doesn't seem to include PTG, Stratus or VEOS. is this because they were AIM shares?If so, how does the write down work? TKS |
Posted at 14/1/2008 12:32 by petercrosby Could someone do a reverse takeover of ARX and turn it into a completely different company? What's the likelyhood? |
Posted at 11/1/2008 12:34 by mad mike steve36 is right. I phone the relevant taxation helpline to get confirmation, but in the end it is up to the Tax inspector to decide if it isn't on their formal 'negligible value list'. I got them to check if it was on their list up to today, as the web-list is only updated at the end of each month. ARX isn't yet on their internal list for January.I think, we can include the capital loss on our tax return for tax year 06-07 i.e. the one that must be submitted by the end of this month. But we would need to add the comment justification that:- 1) the Aerobox plc made a regulatory release on 24/1/07 that "the prospects of any returns for shareholders of ARX[Aerobox] are likely to be minimal" [source: RNS] 2) Aerobox's only asset (a US subsidary - ACS) entered Chapter 11 on 23/1/07, when "the Judge declared that the equity interests of Aerobox plc are expunged, determined, retired and effectively wiped out and of no value". [source: the subsidary's CEO] 3) Aerobox made a further regulatory release on 15/3/07 that "there is very little prospect of any return to ARX[Aerobox]" from its only asset (a US subsidary - ACS) [source: RNS] 4) Aerobox filed for the company to be dissolved in November 2007. |
Posted at 30/11/2007 20:07 by mad mike Incidentially, once the shares were suspended, does anyone know how someone shorting ARX can close their short, and thus realise their profit? Afterall, once shares are suspended, nobody can buy or sell them. So how can a shorter buy shares, to close his shorts, in such circumstances?Just an academic question. |
Posted at 23/7/2006 22:05 by metex Good evening everyone....back from the Hungarian Hills.Ref: The Watermark commission shortfall of approx £0.4m. It would appear that the only way this could be related to Arx....is if the following had taken place. 1/ The commission was related the the Middle East airline 5yr long term supply contract....announce 2/ That to achieve a good price for the ULD units over those 5yrs....all monies.i.e. the total contract price of $6m....were paid upfront to Arx. 3/ At approx 10% commission on overall contract....Watermar 4/ Due to quality problems with first years`s batch...delivered between Jan and June....the whole contract....under the initial agreement terms could be terminated....hence Watermark would not receive all the £0.4m they were expecting in this financial year. So hypothetically all of this....1/ to 4/....would have had to have taken place IMHO....for it to have been directly linked to Arx ULD`s....otherwise as mad mike pointed out....there is no way....a commission figure of £0.4m....could have been earnt by Watermark....through Arx contracts....while the new Arx FD also seems to have confirmed in an e-mail....that no Arx ULD orders have been cancelled....or reduced....by Watermark....so the chances of 1/ to 4/ having really happened....appear very slim. Although it is interesting that Arx....have in fact....already highlighted some new "quality" issues....in their Final Results statement of the 18th May 2006....saying that on making investigations....th The alleged comments of the new Arx FD....relating to "quality" issues being general Watermark matters....do give some Arx investor reassurance....but more specific information from Arx concerning this matter....in the next RNS....would help to clear the obvious confusion....that has unfortunately been generated....by Watermark`s recently stated misfortunes....being in part down to air cargo container commission shortfalls. (The separate reference....to a further £0.6m shortfall....made also in Watermark comments....appears to be related to a bad debt issue....with one of Watermark`s own agents....and in no way connected to any Arx issue). Going forward....Arx investors should now be hoping....that the enthusiasm generated by the comments made in the new FD appointment RNS....can be shortly be reinforced....by more new orders....either ULD or non-ULD....and by Arx management clarification of the ULD order situation....through the Watermark connection....DYOR. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
