ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

JPM JP Morgan Chase and Co

191.86
0.12 (0.06%)
After Hours
Last Updated: 21:33:59
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type
JP Morgan Chase and Co NYSE:JPM NYSE Common Stock
  Price Change % Change Share Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.12 0.06% 191.86 194.46 190.79 192.27 7,434,512 21:33:59

Former J.P. Morgan Banker Loses Argument in 'London Whale' Case

22/03/2017 2:53pm

Dow Jones News


JP Morgan Chase (NYSE:JPM)
Historical Stock Chart


From May 2019 to May 2024

Click Here for more JP Morgan Chase Charts.
By Margot Patrick 

LONDON--Former J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. executive Achilles Macris lost a final argument Wednesday over whether the U.K. financial regulator identified him in an enforcement notice over the 2012 "London whale" trading debacle.

The Supreme Court ruled that Mr. Macris wasn't identified by the Financial Conduct Authority in a 2013 action, overturning two earlier rulings in favor of Mr. Macris's claim that references in the notice clearly referred to him.

The decision means several similar suits against the FCA over the identity of traders and executives in enforcement notices are now likely to be abandoned, lawyers said.

J.P. Morgan was fined GBP137.6 million by the FCA in 2013 and the actions of executives in its London-based Chief Investment Office were described in a public enforcement notice. Mr. Macris, the head of the unit, argued that he could be identified by terms such as "CIO London management," without having been given the chance to give his version of events.

Supreme Court Justice Jonathan Sumption disagreed that "CIO" or "CIO management" would be construed to mean Mr. Macris or even an individual.

"The real question is whether the terms of the notice itself would have conveyed to a reasonable member of the public without extrinsic information that any of these terms was a synonym for Mr. Macris. Plainly it would not," Justice Sumption wrote in the ruling.

Mr. Macris in a statement said he was "naturally disappointed" and that the FCA had won its case on a technical interpretation. "Although the Supreme Court has ruled that I was not identified, the reality is that the FCA's Final Notice to J.P. Morgan made findings about my conduct which the FCA had to retract," he said.

An FCA spokesman said it is pleased with the decision and is now considering what it means for other cases involving so-called third-party rights. The FCA has to give parties the right to respond if they are identified in an enforcement action.

J.P. Morgan paid nearly $1 billion to U.S. and U.K. authorities in 2013 and admitted wrongdoing over $6.2 billion in trading losses in the CIO.

The FCA fined Mr. Macris more than $1 million last year for failing to be open with authorities about the trades. Mr. Macris at the time said he agreed to the fine since the FCA didn't accuse him of deliberately misleading authorities and he wanted to end a "drawn-out and burdensome process."

Write to Margot Patrick at margot.patrick@wsj.com

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

March 22, 2017 10:38 ET (14:38 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

1 Year JP Morgan Chase Chart

1 Year JP Morgan Chase Chart

1 Month JP Morgan Chase Chart

1 Month JP Morgan Chase Chart

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock