We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Apple Inc | NASDAQ:AAPL | NASDAQ | Common Stock |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.98 | 1.17% | 171.28 | 171.23 | 171.46 | 40,601 | 09:30:09 |
By Joe Palazzolo
The U.S. government on Monday faced aggressive questioning from judges reviewing a finding last year that Apple Inc. conspired with publishers to raise the price of electronic books as it prepared to enter the market in 2010.
Amazon.com Inc., though not a party in the case, cast a long shadow over the arguments at the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan. The company held 80% to 90% of the market before the iPhone maker decided to get into the book business, and at least one of the three judges on the appellate panel suggested that Apple's negotiations with publishers spurred competition by "breaking the hold of a monopolist."
"It's like all the mice getting together to put a bell on the cat," said Judge Dennis Jacobs.
Malcolm Stewart, one of the Justice Department's top appellate lawyers, said antitrust officials were aware of Amazon's grip on the market but regarded the company's aggressive discounting, $9.99 for most best sellers, as "a good thing for consumers." A spokeswoman for Amazon didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Justice Department sued Apple in 2012, alleging civil antitrust violations. After a three- week trial, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan ruled last year that Apple, Cupertino, Calif., helped publishers that were fed up with Amazon's discounts, over which they had no control, change the marketplace. Apple's agreements handed publishers power to set their own prices. Some of the publishers had suggested the arrangement in meetings with Apple executives, according to evidence presented during the trial.
A key provision of the Apple contacts required publishers to offer in Apple's store the lowest sale price in the marketplace. That, in turn, ensured publishers would force Amazon to change its business model, otherwise they would suffer heavy losses matching Amazon's discounted prices, according to Judge Cote. Prices on many e-books increased immediately.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., a lawyer for Apple, said Judge Cote ignored the benefits consumers realized after Apple's entry into the market. The iPad maker increased competition by diminishing Amazon's power, he argued. Some new e-book prices increased, but average prices across the market decreased, and the number of available titles increased dramatically.
Apple agreed to pay $450 million in the wake of Judge Cote's decision, most of it to e-book consumers, as part of a settlement with private plaintiffs and 33 states that joined the Justice Department's 2012 lawsuit against the company.
But Apple only has to pay if it loses its appeal. The publishers also reached a settlement with authorities, paying a total of about $160 million.
Write to Joe Palazzolo at joe.palazzolo@wsj.com
Access Investor Kit for Amazon.com, Inc.
Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US0231351067
Access Investor Kit for Apple, Inc.
Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US0378331005
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires
1 Year Apple Chart |
1 Month Apple Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions