We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Apple Inc | NASDAQ:AAPL | NASDAQ | Common Stock |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.75 | 6.21% | 183.78 | 183.35 | 184.00 | 187.00 | 182.66 | 186.645 | 163,224,774 | 05:00:00 |
By Georgia Wells
A fight between two of the largest makers of fitness trackers just got smaller.
In a ruling released Thursday, the U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington invalidated the last of the patents that AliphCom Inc.'s Jawbone said its rival Fitbit Inc. had infringed upon, lifting uncertainty around the sale of Fitbit products in the U.S.
The invalidated patents covered sleep monitoring and data output. Judge Dee Lord said these patents "seek a monopoly on the abstract ideas of collecting and monitoring sleep and other health-related data, and are therefore ineligible."
The two San Francisco companies sell wearable fitness trackers for users' wrists and clothing that monitor activity. The devices are part of a fast-growing segment of consumer electronics that includes Apple Inc.'s Apple Watch.
The complaint Jawbone filed last July sought to halt U.S. imports of Fitbit's wearable devices. The ITC said Jawbone could still pursue claims that Fitbit allegedly stole trade secrets.
"The two patents that are the subject of the ITC ruling represent only a portion of Jawbone's case against Fitbit and a small subset of Jawbone's overall patent portfolio," Jawbone said in a statement. The company said it plans to appeal the patent ruling.
Fitbit declined to comment.
Judge Lord based the ruling on a Supreme Court decision from 2014 that said companies can't claim software patents for abstract ideas without inventive concepts. She previously ruled other Jawbone patents were invalid for the same reason.
The two companies are also suing each other in other courts. Jawbone sued Fitbit for patent infringement in federal court in San Francisco in 2015. Fitbit has also sued Jawbone in federal courts in San Francisco and Wilmington, Del., for allegedly infringing its patents over the technology underpinning its device. The cases are pending.
On May 9, the two sides will meet at the trade commission for a hearing about Jawbone's trade secrets. Jawbone alleged that Fitbit implemented a plan last year to "decimate Jawbone by hiring away key employees and stealing trade secrets."
Jawbone said Fitbit contacted an estimated 30% of Jawbone's workers and ultimately hired five, who then allegedly took 18,000 of Jawbone's confidential digital files to Fitbit.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 29, 2016 19:54 ET (23:54 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
1 Year Apple Chart |
1 Month Apple Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions