Zinnwald Lithium Share Discussion Threads

[shieldbug] 11/1/2023 14:55

Does anyone know if Henry Maxey who owns 14.7% of ZNWD is the same Henry Maxey who is CIO of Ruffer? He seems to have bought 12.7 million shares in the December 2021 raise at 15.5p.

[5chipper] 27/11/2022 13:49

Zinnwald switched process to planning to produce lithium hydroxide

[bountyhunter] 26/11/2022 21:14

Interesting, "a different kind of lithium to the EMH lithium", that's rather surprising, or is it just the process

[bountyhunter] 23/11/2022 18:19

Pootle being the operative word.

[shieldbug] 23/11/2022 11:52

Not sure what the criticism here is based on. I am happy for this to pootle along. It could accelerate but it probably won't. Personally I would be amazed if they produce a BFS by end of 2023. At least with the exploration they can produce a bigger resource in the BFS than in the PEA so less chance of anti climax. Happy to have Jeremy Martin and Secker on the board. There are plenty of juniors with big bold promises and no chance ever of delivering anything.

[bountyhunter] 22/11/2022 20:36

I must reluctantly confess I am a bit fed up with hearing about their 'strategy'. What we need is action we have had enough words.

[sharekitchen1974] 22/11/2022 16:30

I think this will drift lower for a while as nothing significant to light the fire

[steeplejack] 22/11/2022 13:55

There's some sizeable sales being printed today and clearly some holders,despite the MOU recently arranged,have decided to cut and run.The company's PR lacks dynamism,especially compared with the likes of Atlantic Lithium.Equity markets are very risk averse currently and even good news is greeted with a shrug.The stock is probably well oversold for what that's worth.

[my retirement fund] 22/11/2022 08:46

Wonder what will next wake the share price up ?

[sev22] 04/11/2022 15:09

Zinnwald Lithium aims to deliver Bankable Feasibility Study by the end of 2023.

[my retirement fund] 01/11/2022 09:21

you'll need to get it out of bottom drawer for the odd fundraising though ?

[bsg] 01/11/2022 08:45

Bottom draw for this for the next 5 years.

[bountyhunter] 01/11/2022 07:46

Yes moving in the right direction at last!

[steeplejack] 01/11/2022 07:31

Things beginning to bubble.....at long last.

[bountyhunter] 31/10/2022 12:53

It has been now.

[sporazene2] 31/10/2022 12:40

surprised the move by EMH to tie up to get support from Saxony and Germany governments wasnt picked up here.

[bountyhunter] 31/10/2022 11:32

It's worth reading the EMH RNS out today as it's the same Lithium deposit just across the Czech border...

[sev22] 28/10/2022 13:22

From the same article:

Europe Update.

There have also been developments in Europe just this week. French company Imerys (FR:NK) has announced a €1bn (£870mn) mine and processing plant combination in the centre of the country, which would produce enough lithium hydroxide each year to power 700,000 electric vehicles from 2028 onwards.

The company has bona fides through its existing minerals processing expertise. It is also already mining above the deposit from which it will get its lithium, although this is a separate operation for the ceramics industry. The lithium is deeper down, which means an underground mine needs to be built – no easy task. “I can tell you that many of the choices we are making in terms of technology are more expensive than what is done in China or in Australia,” Imerys chief executive Alessandro Dazza told analysts on 24 October. “Many decisions we are taking do have a cost, but we do believe this is our mission to make this mine an example in France, in Europe, in the world, and to address many of the typical questions that would be posed by environmental institutions.”

As per Imerys’s numbers, if all the serious European lithium projects currently on the drawing board made it to production, they would produce 250,000 tonnes a year of lithium carbonate. Overall global demand by then will be 2.5mn tonnes, according to Benchmark. The 250,000-tonne figure also includes the on-ice Jadar project in Serbia, the removal of which would potentially lower actual production levels by 58,000 tonnes a year. Other projects will likely fall by the wayside as local opposition or simple economics become roadblocks.