We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Watchstone Group Plc | LSE:WTG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYNBFN51 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 52.10 | 50.00 | 54.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/6/2016 20:53 | hxxp://www.shareprop another brilliant bit of analysis by TW@t above (from more than a year ago) | nicky name | |
14/6/2016 20:42 | Squire, these journalists are a herd, one minute they are all negative once one turns positive, the others will follow they are a waste of time and space all too timid to risk saying anything different human nature unfortunately | nicky name | |
14/6/2016 20:39 | I'll eat my hat if they get as much as £10 million 'My Legal Friend' is in the same PI mass motor claims market as QPP was in my opinion, the case was launched to embarass its competitor if I wanted to bring a class action, I would have chosen a firm with expertise in that branch of the law (like Slater Gordon) it is absurd that every time a risk-capital investor loses money, he goes bleating to his lawyer they are going to have to have a rock-solid case to make progress, and not to be overturned on appeal | nicky name | |
14/6/2016 15:24 | I think those that are limiting costs to those shareholders using my legal friend have vastly underestimated the potential losses. If and yes it is a big if, they win, then the floodgates will open. Everyone who has made a loss with any send will make a claim (nicky numb nuts wont!) I think it is only a test amount anyway, so limiting potential losses to £10m is silly. | lydnem | |
14/6/2016 15:07 | Well the motley crew have something nice to say about watchstone group. Special situation There was also news today from AIM-listed Watchstone (LSE: WTG), the renamed and remaining rump of the notorious Quindell, which sold most of its assets to Australian firm Slater & Gordon over a year ago. Watchstone’s new board has cleared up most of the past mess. Today’s news of a payment of $2.75m to settle litigation relating to an old acquisition concludes one of a few outstanding matters. The shares are trading at 207p, valuing the company at around £95m. Watchstone has cash of about £85m, management is “confidentR I reckon the old Quindell directors will bear the brunt of a Serious Fraud Office investigation, while compensation claims from some ex-shareholders — currently amounting to less than £10m — may or may not come to anything. I believe the difference between my calculation of the company’s intrinsic value and the market value gives a sufficiently wide margin of safety to make the shares a buy. | squire007 | |
13/6/2016 21:27 | only fraud here is this troll 'IOPABBM' operating under numerous aliases he doesn't like me pointing this out one day regulation will catch up with the digital information age might take a while though which is why someone is trying to make hay whilst the sun shines in my opinion | nicky name | |
12/6/2016 22:13 | .................... | dalesiders | |
12/6/2016 22:04 | the only fraud at WTG is the troll that is constantly posting here under multiple aliases geoff, leave him to talk to himself? don't give the TW@t oxygen | nicky name | |
12/6/2016 15:11 | Agreed, we do seem to have drifted away from WTG and its prospects. | geoffreen | |
12/6/2016 14:53 | You're just digging a deeper hole. Time to STFU now before you make a bigger idiot of yourself. | ionlypostafterbbms | |
12/6/2016 14:11 | The date of GCR's report was 22/04/14. Today is 12/06/16. On a thread devoted to WTG and its prospects, why do you wish to turn back more than 2 years? | geoffreen | |
12/6/2016 14:02 | You haven't read it. That's truly shocking. It's relevance is to demonstrate your wilful ignorance. I can think of no legitimate reason why you would not inform yourself of an investigative report that wiped £1B (that's BILLION) in a day off a share you claim to own, if not now then certainly when it was red hot fresh news. Are you employed by QPP / WTG to troll BBs? Either way, your posts are worthless stupidity. | ionlypostafterbbms | |
12/6/2016 13:23 | IOnlyPostAfterBBMs, When was GCR's piece published? Why is it relevant to an appreciation of WTG's propects? | geoffreen |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions