We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verdant | VET | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 8.00 | 00:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 02/2/2002 18:54 by justjim37 NAV,BDT now up 18%, RDN a tad down, MCI up 5% and VET .......wow!!!!!!!!. On Monday XTL have a good weekend with Gracey. Does your wife know??? |
Posted at 01/2/2002 07:21 by richoneday NAV_Mike - Wonder if the 30,000 trades yesterday will be investigated. I sold two weeks ago at 33.5p but bought at 24p so I have no complaints. Last weeks rollercoaster meant that i was pleased that I got out when I did. Timing, as they say is everything. On balance If I still had my shares in VET I would sell and invest in other companies likely to be swallowed up.Well done to all VET holders |
Posted at 31/1/2002 07:17 by nav_mike To the poster who said the company would be reporting before Jan month end - was that a wind up?The results will probably give us an idea as to whether VET have been negotiating from a position of strength or not. Trouble is delayed results usually only mean one thing |
Posted at 29/1/2002 14:39 by tonyx NAV,:-))) You are correct-sold CAB because I was down on VET & wanted to bank profits (for once)!!! Sods law I suppose. Should have topped up with VET. Good luck with CAB. Tony |
Posted at 29/1/2002 14:26 by nav_mike Hi Tony - yeah Im still in VET - didnt see the point in bailing out Friday before results. U R right tho...very strange!What a rollercoaster... Friday - VET bomb then CAB jump 30% Tuesday - CAB relist down 30% but VETs jump! who said shares were dull? I still hold CABs but I bought on a 6 to 12 month view - I think the refinancing was positive and has just flushed out the weak holders such as you kind sir! :-P |
Posted at 29/1/2002 14:18 by tonyx Blimey,lucky I didn't sell!!A bit strange though! NAV-u still in VET?? Sold my CAB just after 8 am today. Tony |
Posted at 26/1/2002 00:11 by alsfar I got out today at 35p. No reason related to VET, just decided to take profits and re-invest elsewhere. The elsewhere being FIB, which crashed today on the double wammy of Energis yesterday and a profits warning. May or may not have been a wise move, but a profit taken is better than one in the bush (or something like that). Good luck to those still holding. |
Posted at 02/1/2002 16:59 by chadders HighStreetMike,VET posted final results last year on 9th Jan so I expect roughly the same this year, but no dates announced by the company as far as I know. I'm still holding on hoping for good news on the results front i.e. near break even with cash burn stemmed, and an announcement about the offer must be due shortly. Personally I think the offer will be higher than most people's expectations due to Jason Drummonds majority shareholding of 53%. Wishful thinking maybe but I can't see him selling at less than the cost of his private investments at 45p plus. The only potential downside I see at the moment is the possibility that the takeover talks breakdown but I expect that this is factored into the current price considering the 'whisper' is the offer is at 45p. |
Posted at 08/12/2001 10:17 by chadders Agressive Saver,I believe Jason Drummond holds the key to this one not Chris Akers. Drummond holds the controlling interest at 53% of the equity. He has been buying at 45p, he turned down an offer of £8, according to the Guardian article (although this can be largely discarded), the shares have a 12 month high of around 120p and his 'baby' is going to be one of the first internet technology based companies to turn a profit. Why should he sell cheap? Early yesterday after the initial price rise the MMs marked the price down to catch all the faint hearted and it didn't really succeed and the price moved up aggressively in the afternoon. VET shares are relatively scarce - only 500K traded yesterday and it was a big news item! There is much more scope in this than the current consensus suggests IMHO. This is not the normal scenario where the institutions would be happy to cut their losses, the negotiations will centre on an individual who believes in the company. What value VET when it reports it's first profit? I am sitting tight and remain confident. As always DYOR |
Posted at 07/12/2001 15:13 by stewjames alsfar, I like to see some evidence in the now of undervaluation. VET looks to be burning cash all too quickly and not growing the bottom line quickly enough to deserve a valuation even as high as today's to me. They say breakeven next year, I really can't see it. But then I accept I'm not much of a visionary :-)Host Europe, the operating performance is OK but I certainly don't think it's worth it's current market cap! Strange that even now people are still willing to assign the sort of valuations to techs that they wouldn't even think of giving to 'old' economy shares with similar or better financial perfomance. pacman88, sounds like that method requires a remarkable crystal ball. :-) Funnily enough VET was on my watchlist when the price was at its low, mainly for the cashpile and the hint (from the company, if not the figures) of stemming cash outflow. It'll be interesting to see how it pans out. I wish you (further) good luck. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
