![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turbo Power | LSE:TPS | London | Ordinary Share | CA8999101030 | COM SHS NPV |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.035 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
11/3/2013 13:50 | Think what you like, wait and see. :) | unkwn | |
11/3/2013 13:41 | "Days done here..." Apparently not. | ![]() jenny tulwought | |
11/3/2013 13:40 | A friend has been telling me to look at Pure Wafer (LON:PUR) recently, saying it's generating good cashflows, and that the shares might be cheap. Their results this morning seem to indicate he might be onto something, as Pure Wafer (which does some sort of silicon wafer recycling) reports a move into profit (just!), but more importantly net cashflow generated of $2.8m for the 6 months to 31 Dec 2012. There is a large depreciation charge, which is historic, and of course non-cash, so the attraction is that it's now throwing off free cashflow. Following a Placing, net debt has fallen dramatically from $15.1m to $3.4m, so this look pretty interesting. The market cap is only £13.7m at 5.25p, so looks like worthy of more research, although one must remember to convert figures reports in dollars into sterling. It's a turnaround situation that I quite like the look of. IF they can continue improving margins, then they could have a nice business there, and providing no significant replacement capex is needed, which I'm told it isn't. | ![]() petersmith3 | |
11/3/2013 13:11 | Days done here, the rediculous over value will soon be corrected, expected you to stop at 0.80 but you've gone a bit over with all the hype. | unkwn | |
11/3/2013 12:26 | There must have been massive dilutions along the way - Valued at £14million now so if £28 in 2000 the value was hardly £40billion then! -:) | ![]() linney3 | |
11/3/2013 12:18 | Draw a chart back to when this floated!!! £28 equivalent down to 1p is this a record? | robo15 | |
11/3/2013 11:54 | likely to be ferocious when it comes | ![]() brando69 | |
11/3/2013 11:53 | I was about to say this was holding up rather well - is THIS the start of the slide? | ![]() jenny tulwought | |
11/3/2013 10:38 | 11 March 2013 MTI Wireless Edge Ltd ("MTI" or the "Company") US$2M CONTRACT WINS FOR MTI WIRELESS EDGE MTI Wireless Edge (AIM: MWE), the developer and manufacturer of sophisticated antennas and antenna systems, is pleased to announce that it has secured a major new military contract worth US$1.45m and a number of commercial orders which together total US$2m. This brings its total order book to US$7.5m - US$6.6m of which is credited to 2013. MTI CEO, Dov Feiner, commented: 'We are delighted with these orders especially the one from the military sector, which gives us confidence in the long term prospects of this segment, which we are well positioned to fulfil.' .................... This is the next multibagger waiting to happen get in before pros start trading it and drive it in to orbit same as they done here! "US$6.6m of which is credited to 2013." $6.6m is equal to more than the company's total market CAP of £4.19m and the share price hardly moves! Can't believe the share price hasn't jumped at least 100% on news like this! The traders must have missed it completely. Once it gets noticed it will rocket. Perhaps when the US markets open it will take off big time as the contracts are with the US military. | brabazon3 | |
11/3/2013 10:28 | wow... madness... | ![]() brando69 | |
11/3/2013 09:36 | Yes, I will never get involved but unless the company comes out without another statement the punters and mm's might take this to 1.5p, it sure looks like it's heading to crazy levels, already 40 million added for a tiny contract. | 34simon | |
11/3/2013 09:33 | Maybe not - 7 minutes is a long time during swings to and fro of a TPS investor (not that I'm anything more than an observer I would hasten). | ![]() jenny tulwought | |
11/3/2013 09:26 | More like a nightmare later today for those that paid 1.1p! | ![]() linney3 | |
11/3/2013 09:22 | Agreed - falling fast now but is this a chance to get in on the madness (a pause for breath) - or a return to sanity and huge losses for those who chased it up to 1.1. It's like watching a thriller ! | ![]() jenny tulwought | |
11/3/2013 09:19 | Jenny Nobody is perfect on here, any common sense should have seen the price correct itself back around 0.2p, to go over 1p and a market cap of over 40 million is complete madness and a return to dot com boom style chasing ! | 34simon | |
11/3/2013 09:17 | 90% of this stock is held by one investor which means that the some of the remaining 10% is simply being passed from PI to PI so it has to drop back - 40million traded so far this morning so my point is clear | ![]() linney3 | |
11/3/2013 09:14 | This has to come back...BUT then again I was saying that Friday..... | ![]() chesty1 | |
11/3/2013 09:14 | The drop back should start about now | ![]() linney3 | |
11/3/2013 09:12 | Yep - and you could have bought at .49 just over an hour ago. "slaughtered" eh? The offer is 1.1 now - but if you're reading this after 9:15, it's probably very out dated info. | ![]() jenny tulwought | |
11/3/2013 09:12 | Well done to all who have made decent money on this. | ![]() tez123 | |
11/3/2013 09:07 | I'm going to have to take TPS off the monitor, I cannot watch this, 400k buy 1.02p ! | 34simon | |
11/3/2013 09:04 | I wish all of my stocks could rise 9 fold on a 2.5 mil contract and increased losses with a warning they are totally dependent on major shareholder :-)) | 34simon | |
11/3/2013 09:00 | They secured a large contract from Bombardier. Now would Bombardier enter into a contract with a company that wouldn't be able to perform its contractual responsibilities? Of course they wouldn't. Bomb. would have done DD I suspect they could have a placing sorted or maybe an injection of inward investment | ![]() mirabeau | |
11/3/2013 08:58 | Jenny Tulwought 11 Mar'13 - 08:41 - 872 of 874 0 0 It's like Jellyworks - if anyone recalls that particular 'learning curve' ! Jellyworks!!!! dotcom boom,bang pop flop! few years back.....lol | ![]() wisteria2 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions