Telephonetics Share Discussion Threads

[lbo] 23/3/2009 11:14

ANSWER THE QUESTIONS POSED TO YOU! Why have you changed your posts? Why have you lied and tried to cover up what you said? And yes you are a "person proven to be a liar and acting corrupt". Its all in black and white on the other Telephonetics thread and in the hands of an emails with myself and Brewin Dolphin.

[rascalhardin] 23/3/2009 11:13

Lol! Sorry to hear about your "Huge Growth", LBO!

[lbo] 23/3/2009 11:07

Rascalhardin is now posting on the other TPH thread and is hiding from the questions! COME ON RASCALHARDIN PLEASE RESPOND to why you are covering up what you said?

rascalhardin - 23 Mar'09 - 10:44 - 3 of 4


Won't buy it while Mike Neville is Chairman. Look at his record elsewhere - WTV, MNT FLX, Crucial Plan.

Much quieter here than on the other thread.

[rascalhardin] 23/3/2009 11:04

Not so keen on this thread now. Too full of people such as LBO who use words such as "liar" and "corrupt" without any evidence whatsoever, and then refuse to explain why they use those words.

It will be interesting to see if his friends support these outrageous accusations. If he has any!

[lbo] 23/3/2009 11:01

WHY ARE YOU HIDING FROM THE QUESTIONS RADCALHARDIN??

LBO - 23 Mar'09 - 09:40 - 695 of 695 edit


Can you also explain why you changed your post making accusations against Brewin Dolphin? REMEMBER THEY AND I HAVE THE ORIGINAL POST ON EMAIL! Can you also explain why you deleted posts?

rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 07:21 - 627 of 694


2t/John,

Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman.

While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors.

So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed.

Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though.

In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though!

As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors.

LBO - 18 Mar'09 - 10:52 - 628 of 694 edit


Ok thanks Rascalhardin! I have copied your post and emailed it to Brewin Dolphin and lets see how they respond. Would you like to put it in writing aswell?

[e-mail]


rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 629 of 694


All fact, LBO. Sadly. Are you close to Brewin Dolphin?

rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 630 of 694


.

[rascalhardin] 23/3/2009 10:44

Won't buy it while Mike Neville is Chairman. Look at his record elsewhere - WTV, MNT FLX, Crucial Plan.

Much quieter here than on the other thread.

[lbo] 23/3/2009 09:40

Can you also explain why you changed your post making accusations against Brewin Dolphin? REMEMBER THEY AND I HAVE THE ORIGINAL POST ON EMAIL! Can you also explain why you deleted posts?

rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 07:21 - 627 of 694


2t/John,

Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman.

While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors.

So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed.

Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though.

In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though!

As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors.

LBO - 18 Mar'09 - 10:52 - 628 of 694 edit


Ok thanks Rascalhardin! I have copied your post and emailed it to Brewin Dolphin and lets see how they respond. Would you like to put it in writing aswell?

[e-mail]


rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 629 of 694


All fact, LBO. Sadly. Are you close to Brewin Dolphin?

rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 630 of 694


.

[lbo] 23/3/2009 09:30

And perhaps they will get in touch with you??? PLEASE ANSWER WHY YOU COVERED UP THINGS YOU SAID AND CHANGED YOUR POSTS DAYS LATER?

"Validated user is a recognised subscriber of ADVFN. The identity of an Unvalidated user is unconfirmed"

[rascalhardin] 23/3/2009 09:28

advfn will probably get in touch with you later. Have a nice day.

[lbo] 23/3/2009 09:25

Please ANSWER THE QUESTIONS! Why did you change your posts days later and cover up what you said?

Your behaviour again supports what I said "the only person proven to be a liar and acting corrupt on here is you??????"

PLEASE TELL US WHY YOU ARE TRYING TO HIDE WHAT YOU SAID?

[rascalhardin] 23/3/2009 09:21

Lol! You were asked to justify your use of the words "liar" and corrupt". You have failed to produce any evidence to justify such serious charges.

[lbo] 23/3/2009 09:19

rascalhardin - 23 Mar'09 - 09:16 - 689 of 689


Lol!


NOT EVEN AN ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS I SEE!

[lbo] 23/3/2009 09:13

Perhaps after you respond to my questions you can then also repond to Euro99???

euro99 - 18 Mar'09 - 19:43 - 663 of 687


rascal

From memory

In your posts about the WTV subsid. accounts you referred to the administration charge of £3MM and, in the same post, suggested that the charge was substantially directors fees and auditors charges. This demonstrates, as has been explained to you, a complete misunderstanding of group accounts. You implied that the directors, and perhaps even the auditors, had enjoyed secret profits from this arrangement at the expense of shareholders.

In another of your posts you imply that over £1MM was "hidden" in a dormant subsidiary (Kamera). Even a cursory reading of the RNS's would have shown you that this was untrue. The assets were sold and the investment subsequently provided for and written off. Note, I am not commenting on the identity of the high profile investors - nor on the wisdom of the transaction. That issue was raised (by CT, and by me - incidentally) years ago. But your "discoveries" in the accounts don't add anything, or evidence anything.

In a number of posts you ask questions about the auditors and suggest that perhaps the same auditors are engaged at other Mike Neville companies. You do so in a way which is riddled with innuendo, and you are treading on dangerous ground. If it was me, and not Mike Neville, who was the subject of your campaign I can assure you that you would not have been allowed to continue as long as you have.

I don't seek to defend Neville's record - it speaks for itself. However - you are not doing the cause of independent shareholders any good by displaying ignorance and peddling innuendo.

The various regulators will eventually reach their decisions on those companies which have not been compliant. There have been, and continue to be, enquiries. There are more to come. I notice that you don't take the time to enquire as to whether anybody other than yourself might be up to date with these issues?

In any event Telephonetics is a well run company with many happy shareholders. What you are doing over here slagging people off with half baked suggestions is quite beyond me.

[lbo] 23/3/2009 09:08

And 2Trying its now in black and white what rascalhardin said and accused me of and how he changed his posts after the fact and made no reference to changing them yet you choose to focus on my comments that a person who does such things and yet never admits to it only after he is caught is not a "person proven to be a liar and acting corrupt"

That is indeed a very suspicious stance aswell! So perhaps you can also explain why its ok for someone to come on here make all sorts of accusations, cover them up afterwards and then be caught and not be a "liar" or "acting corrupt".

[lbo] 23/3/2009 08:59

Again you have failed to explain why you have changed posts days later and not said you changed them until it was proven you were! You made accusations against me on other boards which were wrong and never admitted you were wrong but went back to try and cover them up!

To me this is a "person proven to be a liar and acting corrupt" especially when the only explanation you can give is "It is within advfn rules for a poster to edit posts at any time. No explanation required as no rules broken. That is why they have an "edit" tag". SO YOU NOW ADMIT YOU WERE DOING IT BUT HAVE NOT EXPLAINED WHY?

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY YOU ARE COVERING UP THE THINGS YOU SAID?

[rascalhardin] 22/3/2009 23:12

LBO,

It is within advfn rules for a poster to edit posts at any time. No explanation required as no rules broken. That is why they have an "edit" tag!

However, it is against advfn rules to call other posters "corrupt" and a "liar". I look forward to your prompt explanation for making these outrageous claims for which you have no evidence whatsoever.

Your explanation for amending your post is rather involved and not very believable.

[lbo] 22/3/2009 15:05

WHYS IS RASCALHARDIN TRYING TO CONTINUALLY DEFLECT FROM ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS POSED TO HIM???


LBO - 20 Mar'09 - 14:52 - 672 of 683 edit


I have just noted rascalhardin is going back and changing posts. I was not sure but its now confirmed. He now has no credibility in my eyes. He never even responded to why he was posting on other threads about me and instead of apoligising for his ludicrous assumptions he is going back trying to cover up what he said.I am also sure he has changed other posts. This is not the behaviour of a genuine poster IMHO.




rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 10:21 - 1311 of 1311


Lol! I notice on looking through the company's history that there was a Swedish disposal in 2007. Uncannily similar to WTV. If you want some fun, try telling a poster called LBO about Mike Neville on the TPH thread - Telephonetics. Mike Neville is a Director of the company, so it is on topic.

It seems like LBO is the only poster there most of the time. I wonder, could it be...?



rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 10:21 - 1311 of 1318


Lol! I notice on looking through the company's history that there was a Swedish disposal in 2007. Uncannily similar to WTV. If you want some fun, try telling a poster called LBO about Mike Neville on the TPH thread - Telephonetics. Mike Neville is a Director of the company, so it is on topic.

It seems like LBO is the only poster there most of the time.

[lbo] 22/3/2009 14:44

You really are an idiot! My computer started its scheduled norton scan and it froze while it was doing it. It would not let me finish typing but the mouse worked very slowly and the pointer was disappearing but I was able click on post reply at one stage. After cancelling the scan and closing windows and reopening I was able to finish my post a few mins later later.

Now can you explain why you went back and changed posts days later and why you are intent on accusing everyone on being liars and corrupt when the only person proven to be a liar and acting corrupt on here is you??????

[rascalhardin] 21/3/2009 19:51

Lol! You should know about paranoia!

"No, I was not finished typing before you posted and my computer froze. So perhaps you are 2trying 2 hard! I have not intentionally gone back days after posting and changed posts like certain people in here.Seems to be some very dubious behavior by the plague that has turned up here IMHO"

If you had not finished typing and then your computer froze, how did you manage to transmit? You must have transmitted for 2trying to catch you out. Hang on...your computer was frozen...so you could not have transmitted.

LBO - would you care to explain?

rascal.

[lbo] 20/3/2009 23:55

Investment Psychology

[2trying] 20/3/2009 23:26

I will accept that , LBO

and I apologise accordingly .

John

( this thread does make me paranoid )

anyway back to the war - apparantly we're doing the "conga" at midnight !

goodness knows where everyone is sleeping !

tell ya what though - no-one but no-one is driving .

edit - some think they are - no they are not - wont let 'em .
anyway - must go !