We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shell Plc | LSE:RDSB | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B03MM408 | 'B' ORD EUR0.07 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1,894.60 | 1,900.40 | 1,901.40 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
07/9/2015 07:43 | money What are the odds they follow Glen and cut the Divi on the back of market chaos? | redartbmud | |
06/9/2015 20:14 | Time to average down and keep enjoying the dividend.Plenty of dry powder to keep doing this until it turns into a sharp uptrend. | moneysage | |
05/9/2015 12:16 | down 22% last time i checked......ouch wllm | wllmherk | |
05/9/2015 09:55 | every body is counting their losses. | 2hoggy | |
05/9/2015 08:52 | board gone deliciously quiet | chairman20 | |
04/9/2015 13:41 | "Merrill downgrades BP, cites mounting M&A and dividend risks" | fangorn2 | |
03/9/2015 14:49 | After £18 it will probably move on to £19, these kind of moves dont happen overnight, but they happen | my retirement fund | |
03/9/2015 14:35 | This might help. Spob posted it yesterday: | whiskeyinthejar | |
03/9/2015 13:06 | Anyone have any views on whether Shell at £16.50 is a better/worse buy than BP at £3.50? | hugepants | |
03/9/2015 10:55 | These will be back to 2000+ within 2 years - and could be double by 2025. But you will be able to get them cheaper than they are now in the short-term - 1300-1500. | eisler | |
03/9/2015 09:58 | 3 hurdles cleared not 2 Brazil,USA,Europe all cleared only Aussies & China to go | 84stewart | |
03/9/2015 09:50 | Steve - At these prices I would say half and half. Also have a look at Shaggy | shaggies_view | |
02/9/2015 22:32 | Can anyone help me can you tell me I'm wanting to invest in rdsb am I better to invest in BG or rdsb ta | stevenrevell | |
02/9/2015 19:46 | The energy and natural resources sectors have long been dependable picks for those seeking market-mashing dividend yields. Even as pressured earnings have prompted dividend growth to be halted, the world's major drillers and diggers have continued to outperform their listed peers. And for the likes of Rio Tinto (LSE:RIO), Glencore (LSE:GLEN) and Royal Dutch Shell (LSE:RDSB), this theme is yet to let up. Thanks to massive fears over commodity markets, shares across the resources segments have shuttled lower -- Rio Tinto has seen its share price slump 30% during the past 12 months alone, while Glencore and Shell have conceded 66% and 36% respectively. As a consequence these companies carry yields that many will consider too good to pass up -- Glencore leads the pack with a monster readout of 7.9% for 2015, oil giant Shell boasts a yield of 7.1%, while Rio Tinto boasts a not-too-shabby 6.1%. Dividend cover on the light side Still, I believe investors should resist the pull of these eye-popping yields as broker projections are likely to disappoint. Not surprisingly all three operators are expected to punch heavy, double-digit earnings drops in the current period, leaving predicted payouts woefully exposed. Over at Rio Tinto, an estimated dividend of 222 US cents per share represents an upgrade from last 2014's 215-cent reward, creating meagre dividend coverage of just 1.1 times -- any reading below 2 times is usually considered risky territory, and for those operating in the commodities categories this point is particularly pertinent as material prices keep on sliding. Glencore is anticipated to keep the payment locked at 18 cents per share in 2015, although this still exceeds predicted earnings of 15.4 cents! And even though Shell is expected to cut 2014's dividend of 188 cents per share to 185 cents this year, coverage also registers at a nail-biting 1.1 times. Cash scramble underlines capital pains I do not believe such numbers have any grounding in reality, particularly as the firms desperately scramble to shore up the balance sheet. In August Glencore announced it was cutting capital expenditure in both 2015 and 2016, to $6bn and $5bn respectively, while it is also slashing jobs and hiving off non-core assets to improve its capital strength. This mirrors similar steps across the industry -- Shell took the hatchet to an additional 6,500 posts at the end of July, while it also announced the $1.4bn sale of a 33% stake in its Showa Japanese business. It also cut planned capex for the second time this year, to $30bn from $35bn in 2014, an action matched by Rio Tinto shortly afterwards -- cuts to $5bn for 2015 and $6bn next year are currently planned. But the threat of further commodity price falls means that these operators are likely to need to introduce even more measures to save cash, a worrying scenario for income hunters -- both copper and oil sunk to fresh multi-year lows last week at $4,980 per tonne and $42.50 per barrel correspondingly. And Shell of course still had to finance the £47bn acquisition of rival BG Group -- the company already sports a colossal $52.9bn debt pile, while the situation is hardly great at Glencore or Rio Tinto either. Glencore's net debt stood at $29.6bn as of June, while its mining peer saw net debt rise to $13.7bn at the mid-point of 2015. Given these factors, I believe only the foolhardy would expect the companies I have mentioned to meet the City's bloated dividend targets. Royston Wild has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. | sarkasm | |
02/9/2015 16:32 | That was a volatile day!Surprised how quickly this rally's and shoots up at even a HINT of OPEC cutting back on oil supply. | moneysage | |
02/9/2015 15:51 | U.S. Oil Inventories +4.7m barrels | wynmck | |
02/9/2015 13:33 | take what he says with a pinch | 84stewart | |
02/9/2015 13:29 | For those interested in oil companies check this Interview with Gaurav Sharma - an Independent Energy Analyst: | jek453 | |
02/9/2015 12:57 | European Commission approval of Shell offer So kind of them | fangorn2 | |
02/9/2015 12:12 | the price all hinges on whether the company can continue to maintain the dividend. if it were not for the BG deal i would not be too worried but that deal is going to soak up a huge amount of cash | kkclimber56 | |
02/9/2015 08:48 | Volatile........this is crazy. | 11_percent | |
02/9/2015 08:42 | nobody can give you a simple honest answer to this because these are very volatile markets. | 4spiel | |
02/9/2015 08:37 | Can anyone advise me if oil went down to 30 dollars what would the rough price off these go down to ta | stevenrevell |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions