ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

SQZ Serica Energy Plc

185.10
3.00 (1.65%)
Last Updated: 14:47:42
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Serica Energy Plc LSE:SQZ London Ordinary Share GB00B0CY5V57 ORD USD0.10
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  3.00 1.65% 185.10 185.30 185.60 185.40 181.30 182.20 847,953 14:47:42
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 812.42M 177.8M 0.4578 4.04 718.44M
Serica Energy Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SQZ. The last closing price for Serica Energy was 182.10p. Over the last year, Serica Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 166.00p to 271.00p.

Serica Energy currently has 388,345,933 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Serica Energy is £718.44 million. Serica Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 4.04.

Serica Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 19776 to 19795 of 35275 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  799  798  797  796  795  794  793  792  791  790  789  788  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
13/12/2018
12:28
But, ironically, some EU leaders see the wide-ranging deal they have agreed with far-off Japan as a possible model for future commercial relations with the United Kingdom, once it formally quits the bloc!!!

Says all you need to know.

wbecki
13/12/2018
12:08
Concur with all you say Pineapple.
JoeStalin spot on as well.

Some people are just deluded.

We voted LEAVE for political reasons, not economic and it was always clear what "Take back control" of laws,borders,trade and money meant..

There was only one set of outcomes that guaranteed all of those and we were told repeatedly.

Outside Single Market.
And for Trade, Outside the Customs Union the only way.

So Brexit, or proper Brexit was always outside both of these.

Anyone who claims the contrary is a liar.

wbecki
13/12/2018
12:04
From the beginning of her time in office, she has taken every opportunity to derail and dismember anything resembling a sovereign people’s Brexit.

In spite of her “no deal is better than a bad deal" pledge, May ensured to relax preparations for a clean separation from the EU on WTO terms. We all saw it coming, the nine-month delay to triggering Article 50 was inauspicious, to say the least.

Thereafter, the strategic missteps and betrayals piled up at an alarming pace: The £20bn cash pledge that quickly doubled, the Irish backstop, Chequers – a monstrosity born out of the backstop – which was quickly rejected, paving the way for the dreadful deal she’s now trying to force upon us.

joestalin
13/12/2018
11:55
Can't say I agree with all that, but, back on topic:


The 1st of 5 permits approved yesterday for Rowallan - Consent to locate the rig


Permits still to come:


Chemical
EIA Direction (undertake drilling ops)
VSP
Oil Discharge

steelwatch
13/12/2018
10:49
DH......i,ve no problem with those who felt remain suits them best. I know people who voted both ways.
The mistake i think the EU has made big time is their attitude during the Brexit negotiations.
Rather than act as if they are sorry to see us leave and they would be delighted if we wished to return ,they have instantly put us into a reverse choke hold and slammed us into the floor. Some will say that its done that way to discourage others leaving. But is the stick going to work better than the carrot. Not on a national level it won't. It will circle the wagons with those who voted to leave.
If they had acted sympathetically and with some show of remorse about the decision i suspect they would have had some that voted leave start to question their decision.
As it turned out they placed a jackboot on the throat.
imho

pineapple1
13/12/2018
10:41
If I had my way they'd each have a sting of convictions by now.
fardels bear
13/12/2018
10:28
Well saw this post that is spot on

Your forgetting that Mark Carney,Bank of England,President,Governor,has clearly indicated via his cronies from Government,if the UK leaves with No Deal,it will impact on 100 billion pound cost to UK Economy over the next fifteen Years?

What clever Mark,hasn't told UK,that if they Remain in Europe,how much it will effect the UK economy over fifteen Years of Mrs May Brexit Deal,why No cost of that proposal,Mark?

15 x 12 Billion per annum= 180 Billion.
1 x 39 Billion = 39 " "
Total = 219 Billion -100 Billion
Saving UK= 119 Billion to re-invest in UK!

If the UK leaves EU,the Netherlands/France Fishing fleets will face an Economic decline that will devastate their CAP Policies!

The Dutch take 90% of Fish from UK Waters to be processed in Netherlands,then repatriate the fish back to the UK?

Just think,this process has effected the UK for the past Forty Five years of depleting the UK Waters,whilst making profits for EU Counties at UK's expense,our MP's are really good at selling everything good off to Foreign Investors,Railways,Post Office,BT,Gas,Elec,Water etc!

It is just a pity the same UK MP's didn't have any convictions to help the UK residents over this same time period being sold out to the EU Subjugation,Major,Blair,Brown Cameron and Mrs May?

The Conservatives under Ted Heath,(Treaty of Rome Act 1957) EEC 1972 took UK into this Abyss and propose to keep the UK their?

robo175
13/12/2018
10:12
Actually I agree pineapple.
I really am a remainer (not really sure) based upon the fact I know it will potentially cost me more money to leave however, there's more to it than that and 1000% respect the result of the referendum! Best of (sqz) luck all.

dunderheed
13/12/2018
09:20
I just find it remarkable that the trade argument carries any weight with anybody. All goods (unless you want brand specific of course) available for sale within the EUs juristiction are available globally from other sources. These products are generally of at least equal quality and often more competitively priced than similar products available from the EU.
Since i have often been both a buyer and seller in my life i,ve more often than not found that the buyer of any product generally has the upper hand and can draw a price line in the sand over which one will not step. Its then down to the seller to either accept whats on offer or risk i take my business elsewhere and buy the alternative of equal quality that is happy to accept.
But oh no not in the Brexit negotiation . Here for some reason we are being told that the country that buys more than it sells and offers up an additional sum of £39B to boot, is in fact the weaker in the negotiation. Quite Bizzare is all i can say.
imho

pineapple1
13/12/2018
09:03
South American and Australian wine are already cheaper and just as good as French wine so that is not going to be a problem before tarriffs are readjusted either!
bountyhunter
13/12/2018
08:45
No doubt if BMC at Longbridge were to start making cars again the UK could buy such engineering marvels as the all new non EU 'Allegro'. It could have Bojo promoting it like his 'new routemaster'.The idea surely appeals to Bojo and his mates as a way of reviving the depressed UK manufacturing sector.
seangwhite
12/12/2018
22:25
And McDonald's will no doubt come up with the MacBMW...
fardels bear
12/12/2018
21:24
Thanks Bounty.....

I see TM won her vote....200-117
The MSM tabloids and remoaners will be out in force saying how we must all respect this vote. The irony of that statement will be lost on those who for the last 2.5yrs have done anything but respect democratic outcomes. Respect results only if they voted for it and it suits them
imho

pineapple1
12/12/2018
21:19
Good points pineapple. More common sense - you will be sure to get a down tick for that from one of the remoaners!
bountyhunter
12/12/2018
21:12
The irony of the zealots of the DUP holding the UK to ransom seems lost on most of the hard line Brexit bunch. Rees Smog the ultra catholic and Arlene really do make the Odd Couple!
seangwhite
12/12/2018
21:04
Losses. What losses.
If they wish to apply tariffs then so can we. Can't see what the problem is .
Seems like there are quite a few countries around the world who are not EU members and seem to do quite nicely on WTO. Why is WTO so good for others but supposedly so potentially destructive for the UK.??????

pineapple1
12/12/2018
20:25
Sham the 39billion pales into insignificance against losses from no deal and that the fish we catch in our waters we largely export to the EU and do not consume at home..
froop
12/12/2018
19:37
That's way too much like common sense FB, we might even get our fishing back as well with that approach and we can't have that can we!?
I think you should be PM! 😉

bountyhunter
12/12/2018
19:35
We could walk away, give them the two Agincourt fingers and save the 39 billion.
fardels bear
12/12/2018
19:12
So what is your plan for Brexit? Revoke article 50 I presume?
TM's deal will clearly not be accepted as the DUP will not vote for it with the backstop and the EU have said that is non negotiable.

bountyhunter
Chat Pages: Latest  799  798  797  796  795  794  793  792  791  790  789  788  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock