Sepura Share Discussion Threads

[mister md] 19/9/2016 11:58

briefly out of auction and straight back into auction 17.5-17.5

[kidknocked] 19/9/2016 11:56

Article just come out saying this could be a takeover target. V good.

[glenkaz] 19/9/2016 11:55

Larva you are as bad as naked Steve! Idiots the pair of you 🤒

[mister md] 19/9/2016 11:52

I would guess in the case of larva its

E) A short gone wrong

[sh1984] 19/9/2016 11:24

I think we will see a holding RNS out sometime towards the end of the week which will send the share price up another few notches.......... there have been some big buys in the background.

Those who bought in around the 9p mark will be 100% up sometime this week

[panic investor] 19/9/2016 11:15

and Hendersons would not be too chuffed would they - Im sure they know more than me and you.

[larva] 19/9/2016 11:09

placing at 5p being worked on by the broker?
if it were to be announced then this would tank to 5p of course, that be a risk holding these

[glenkaz] 19/9/2016 11:06

Come on Sepu 20's a nice place! You'll love it 😍

[letmepass] 19/9/2016 10:39

Renting your body

[nakedsteve] 19/9/2016 10:37

There are lots of easier ways to make money than by risking the lot on a share like this....

[tsmith2] 19/9/2016 09:45

Like strength

[tsmith2] 19/9/2016 09:01

Good vol again, seller being seen out

[melody9999] 19/9/2016 08:05

Shroder - thanks for post 1601. I feel this share is now pricing a risk of failure based on the RNS. As you point out we are a long way from that. Shorters should take note as the downside is limited .... certainly taking note will be other acquisitive companies ....it would be unsurprising to see a bid at this share price

[glenkaz] 19/9/2016 07:36

20p thanks! 🤗💷

[glenkaz] 18/9/2016 23:01

£30k average of 11.5p share price 15.5 share price Monday up up up! Now tell me Steven who's the looser! 🤔

[glenkaz] 18/9/2016 22:25

Naked Steve 🐂💩er!

[nakedsteve] 18/9/2016 20:47

more likely to open at 1.7p glenloser

[nakedsteve] 18/9/2016 20:46

Craaaaash bang wallop

[kidknocked] 18/9/2016 20:28

I think larva might be telling porkies.

[tsmith2] 18/9/2016 19:53

Larva - please do stick up a link to whatever you are reading

[glenkaz] 18/9/2016 19:39

Larva! I really don't believe you read something because I don't believe you can read! 🤒

[shroder] 18/9/2016 18:12

Copy of email sent to Peter Connor for reference only, please dyor.

___________________________________________________________________________

Dear Peter,

Thanks for taking the time last week to run through recent press releases, very helpful.

My concern is not everyone has either inclination, and or confidence to do this. Indeed, some private investors will never contact companies directly believing this is preserve of institutions.

In light of the dramatic drop in share price, could I therefore ask the board/nomad to consider issuing further clarification, particularly around breach of bank covenants which the market may perceive as being directly related to cash flow.

“The Group has sufficient liquidity for its forecast needs. The revised revenue expectations may require Sepura to discuss with its lenders a possible waiver of certain of its covenants from March 2017.”

In my opinion, the RNS wording lends itself to this assumption given that ‘covenantsR17; follow directly on from ‘sufficient liquidly’. My suggestion here would be to highlight those convents potentially impacted by the shortfall such as EBITA metric (as discussed) , again it may help to point out these are some way off and not immediate.

Please note, I have posted a copy of this communication online to assist other investors.

Kind regards,