Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Rusina Mining Nl LSE:RMLA London Ordinary Share AU000000RML9 ORD NPV
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 4.875p 0.00p 0.00p - - - 0 06:37:10
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 1.1 -0.7 -33.1 - 13.65

Rusina Mining Nl (RMLA) Latest News

Real-Time news about Rusina Mining (London Stock Exchange): 0 recent articles
More Rusina Mining Nl News
Rusina Mining Nl Takeover Rumours

Rusina Mining Nl (RMLA) Share Charts

1 Year Rusina Mining Nl Chart

1 Year Rusina Mining Nl Chart

1 Month Rusina Mining Nl Chart

1 Month Rusina Mining Nl Chart

Intraday Rusina Mining Nl Chart

Intraday Rusina Mining Nl Chart

Rusina Mining Nl (RMLA) Discussions and Chat

Rusina Mining Nl Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
23/5/201118:04Rusina Mining - Nickel/PGMS in the Philippines3,074
12/2/200707:43NEW PLACING43

Add a New Thread

Rusina Mining Nl (RMLA) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Rusina Mining Nl trades in real-time

Rusina Mining Nl (RMLA) Top Chat Posts

giant steps: wdurham, i fully understand the ratio and cap limit on the deal - perhaps you misunderstood my previous comment. edit : the max value before scaling gives an implied RMLA price 8.944p
wdurham: Giant steps - The cap value has nothing to do with the level of Rusina's share price. ENK are willing to pay up to £27.1 million for Rusina in ENK paper. Given the number of Rusina shares in issue, that equates to no more than 11.18p per ENK share - irrespective of the price of RMLA shares. If the ENK share price stays below 11.18p per share, then the 4:5 ratio will be maintained. If the ENK share price rises to MORE than 11.18p per share, then the swap ratio of 4:5 will be scaled back so that fewer ENK shares are issued to maintain the total amount payable in ENK paper at £27.1 million. All of this is totally independent of Rusina's share price.
jennyj: Id imagine the share price will get a bit more acurate w/less spread in the merged company, mining funds will be allowed to invest once the market cap gets bigger. It also opens the door to bigger investors.
hectorp: That ENK funding article ( you mention it over there) very timely for the merger event dont you think, ENK could be 2-3 p higher in a month or so IMO.. that would boost Rusina share price considerably at merger, Isn't that the case.. My stragtegy has turned into holding around 2X as many Rusina shares as ENK for the merger. H.
chipperfrd: I like this bit: The Value Cap mechanism has been included on the basis that the European Nickel share price could appreciate strongly, prior to completion of the merger, as a result of a number of initiatives that are currently underway. !! A nod is as good as a wink, etc. Chip
dickturnip: January 21, 2010 Rusina Mining Will Begin Trial Leaching At The Acoje Nickel Laterite Project Within A Matter Of Weeks By Charles Wyatt When we last wrote about Rusina Mining in May last year, things did not look too bright for the company. Once-upon-a-time, Rusina was a great favourite in London. But the fall in the nickel price, when the world fell out of bed at the end of 2008, stymied the company's direct shipping operations from its Acoje project on the island of Luzon in the Philippines. This was Rusina's only source of income at the time, though it was not stretched for cash. Still, time marches on, nickel's regained a fair bit of the ground it lost, and Rusina is very much back in business. It might just be time for investors to think again. Rob Gregory, the chief executive, has just announced that he has been talking to his local partner, DMCI Mining Corporation, about restarting selective shipments. The terms of the deal are being changed so that there is an agreed minimum profit before a shipment takes place. It's also being stipulated that the ore has to be higher than 2% nickel in grade, and that DMCI is responsible for mining, marketing, transport, and capital costs of up to 200,000 tonnes of such ore at a fixed cost. This ought to ensure that a minimum profit is achieved, to be shared equally between the two on a shipment-by-shipment basis. The previous arrangement fell away, not only because of the low price of nickel, but because significant amounts of lower grade ore were present in the shipments. This time round the incremental cost of shipping any of this ore has been reduced significantly by ensuring that the costs of mining it are covered by focussing on the high grade. It will be good to see this operation back, and the current plan is to have it up and running by the end of the month. It's been a while, as it closed officially last July. Having said all that, though, the real focus for investors should be on the nickel heap leach trial facility at Acoje which Rob Gregory has been pushing ahead with during the difficult times. He is a quietly determined fellow, based in the Philippines, who looks as if he had spent a certain amount of time underneath a rugby ruck. In 2007 Aim-traded European Nickel formed a joint venture with Rusina for the advancement of the Acoje deposit. At that stage, European Nickel invested £1 million in Rusina shares and options. It also agreed to earn up to a 40 per cent interest in the nickel laterite portion of Acoje by spending US$10 million on the heap leach trial and feasibility. This meant that Rusina was diluted to 40 per cent, as DMCI Holdings hung onto the balance at the time. The Acoje deposit has a JORC resource estimate in inferred and indicated categories of 50.1 million tonnes grading 1.09% nickel at a cut-off grade of 0.08%, and this is just in the limonite section. The saprolite section, which has yet to be drilled out, could have the same again. Mention of European Nickel will put London investors on the alert London investors, as the company has had hell's own job in getting the US$20 million equity investment that Chinese company JXTC has promised it for its Caldag project in Turkey. This looks like it'll get sorted out in the current quarter, but in the meantime European Nickel is reliant on a loan from Endeavour Capital and cannot contribute its portion to the development of Acoje. But that hasn't stopped Rob Gregory getting on with the trial heap leach at Acoje, because he wisely raised just over £3 million through London brokers Mirabaud last September. It was at about that time that the rolls crusher arrived from Caldag. It had to have its motors refurbished and its electrical system replaced, but this only took a few weeks. And once it had been erected in working order, 3,000 tonnes of laterite ore from Acoje was crushed, agglomerated and stacked on the heap leach pad, all adhering to the nickel laterite leaching technology developed by European Nickel. The important thing to note is that the trial leach was constructed at the same height as the full commercial operation, so there should be a smooth progression, provided everything works as planned. This trial leach is designed to prove the heap percolation and leach rates on a full scale basis, as well as to demonstrate that the HDPE raincoat covering both the pad and the ponds works effectively, as the Philippines is known for its wet season. The latest September quarter last year was one of the wettest. So, early in December the heap leach pad and pilot plant was officially opened in front of dignitaries from Australia and the Philippines. The 3,000 tonnes of laterite ore that the company is now getting to work on contains both limonite and saprolite and is currently being stacked following crushing and agglomeration. Once stacking is completed the irrigation pipes will be put in place and the HDPE raincoat will then cover the lot. Leaching is expected to start in February. This will be a true test of the technology and a vital part of the definitive feasibility study. In the meantime, a full scale laboratory has been working at Acoje for some time, looking at a number of new technologies designed to lower the current forecast cash cost of US$1.60 per pound, before refining charges are taken into account. A re-costing last year of the 2008 prefeasibility study by China Tianchen Engineering Corporation, which provides construction engineering advice to European Nickel, has already claimed that Chinese construction and materials should reduce Acoje's eventual capital costs by about 15 per cent. It helps, of course, that the price of nickel is now at around US$8.50 per pound, compared with US$4.20 per pound this time last year. Rusina has also benefitted from the fact that DMCI decided to withdraw from the project last year, selling its 20 per cent stake to Montemina Resource Corporation which is an associate company of Rusina. Quite clearly Rob Gregory has started 2010 with a good wind behind him, as he is very confident of the outcome of the trial heap leach. It is surely time UK investors took another look as the share price is only a fraction higher than it was when the placement was undertaken four months ago.
hectorp: This gives the distinct impression there are no funding problems to worry us. Relax and watch our share price gently rise into 2010 then onwards. You can also see volume has steadily risen during September.
chipperfrd: Matty, You may well be right - personally I would prefer RML to remain as a going concern rather than be the subject of any merger or T/O. I agree that any M&A action is much more likely to be focussed on the Acoje project rather than the whole company. But they could do with some cash-flow to fund their other projects and with DSO operations suspended a share of the HL operations look their best bet. Current share price remains at a huge discount to their attributed share of the Acoje NPV(10) of US$375m - current Mkt Cap ~ $20m, whereas 40% of $375 ~ $150m, so there would appear to be plenty of potential upside if/when the market starts to believe in a project go-ahead. I would suggest that shareholders would not appreciate any M&A occurring at anything like the current discount to potential value. I would prefer a diminished share of the Acoje project in exchange for their proportion of a funding deal - perhaps the JXTC 20% of Caldag as a model (ie a reduced stake in Acoje of c. 32%). The attributable future cash-flows would still be substantial once full production was attained.
holism: Matty-Hi!! ENK and RMLA appear to be in the short term disaster long tem hold category, but if you had to have just one of them which one would you hold? ENK appears to be more of a technology company with its heap leach, although the recent news from Turkey has changed things somewhat. It would be better off selling its technology rather than mining but I guess someone has to end up holding the baby. ENK's share price was around the 60p mark when the brokers were peddling the original timesacle and RMLA ranged between 25c and 60c before the major collapse.
ashbox: Chip - I'm only in ENK and that is stressful enough!! I don't think I will buy TMC as any benefit there should flow thru to the ENK share price as a result of the direct shareholding. RMLA is more interesting as the price is still very much 'bombed out' and if positive newsflow were forthcoming whereby ENK's future survival and prosperity were assured, then I think for me that would be a catalyst to buy some RMLA. ENK share volme/price has 'woken up' over the last 3 or 4 days so perhaps some news that will give some guideance will be forthcoming.
Rusina Mining Nl share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
Gulf Keyst..
FTSE 100
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:33 V: D:20180218 18:23:09