Rose Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[judijudi] 02/3/2016 18:57

Rose Petroleum plc, the AIM-listed (AIM: ROSE) natural resources company, was informed today that as a result of the transactions set out below, Roy Grainger Williams is now interested in 221,162,668 ordinary shares in the Company ("Ordinary Shares"), representing approximately 8.67% of the Company's current issued share capital. These shares are held in the name of Flute Investments Limited, a company over which Mr Williams has voting control.

The change in Mr Williams' interest in Ordinary Shares is as a result of the sale by him and companies over which he has voting control of 27,380,952 Ordinary Shares at 0.115p per share on 29 February 2016 and 221,162,668 Ordinary Shares at 0.13 pence per share on 1 March 2016 and purchase by Flute Investments Limited of 221,162,668 Ordinary Shares at 0.13p per share on 1 March 2016.

[wisteria2] 02/3/2016 18:33

Mart..this time next year!!! lol, having said that the potential is probably a lot higher, and I agree with your earlier post in regards to the increase in the price of gold and oil!! and long may it continue.

[nick159357] 02/3/2016 18:15

Could this guy be selling for tax reasons ?? Ie . to offset tax on gains from other stock..

[judijudi] 02/3/2016 10:40

The analyst is probably out of a job and so they should be!!

[rmart] 02/3/2016 10:21

lol, i wonder what this broker thinks now of their buy recommendation... only august last yr !

21/08/2015 –
Rose Petroleum had its “Buy” rating reiterated by analysts at FinnCap.

They now have a GBP 12.00p price target on the stock.

[judijudi] 02/3/2016 09:27

Yes of course.
The pretend filetered button :)

[rmart] 02/3/2016 09:18

judijudi,

If you really are telling us that you do not understand why a rising oil and gold price is good for rose then you deserve the filetered button.

You mock others but actually you are the funiest poster with remarks like that. I must be stupid. Maybe a lower gold and oil price is best for Rose?

Doh! what was I thinking!.

[judijudi] 02/3/2016 08:31

That has to be the most pathetic but funniest post of the week
Funny funny funny
😂😂😂😂

[yesyesno] 02/3/2016 08:24

These people don't lose as they are paid a month wages to post of forums like this to try and influence people for bookmakers. Why do you think the are so many of them and the post in the same threads about the same stocks. If they had a real investment in this stock they would have left it years ago based on their own words. Just use the filter and see no more of the adverts.

[judijudi] 02/3/2016 08:21

Rmart,
As we do not produce an eggcup full of oil (though a higher price has to be beneficial) nor a gram of gold I was just wondering what relevance your post of a couple of days ago has

08:01 - 5839 of 5868 0 0
gold now at $1240 which is looking good for rose and oil still rising back up.

[asturius101] 02/3/2016 07:58

Yes I'm afraid it's true rmart, ppl like judi and the friendly captain would probably have better results gambling on the horses. I can't imagine how much poor old judi has lost on this dog.

[rmart] 02/3/2016 07:54

of course I know that ! we stopped mining our own gold because the gold price had fallen. Hence my comment about the price of gold rising.

your comments just show how stupid you are to assume things about other people. can't be doing with mouthy know alls.

[captainonthebridge] 02/3/2016 07:42

Thanks for the response guys, makes a little bit more sense. Much appreciated.

[judijudi] 02/3/2016 07:22

rmart,
Did you actually realise that we have stopped Gold mining?
I think you should have a little think before you post next time. Won't do you any harm to do a bit of research into Rose at the same time.
Maybe read the last RNS as a starting point!!

Rabbit Hat Idiens Please

[jovi1] 01/3/2016 22:46

Hi capital
Your purchase was below the mid price at the time of execution there fore show as a sell.
What confuse many people between buy and sales there is no difference as in most cases for ever sell there is a buy and vice versa
If for example in rose stock you need at least 1000000 demand to have a selling price same amount for a buy but if there is stock available (less than 1 mill) this will be allocated first
This should explain the why at time transactions seems wrong
Sorry for my English but nor my 1st language
The minimum number of share to define the spread is the EMS
Ciao

[gazza102] 01/3/2016 22:40

But who controls the spread? The MMs

[rmart] 01/3/2016 22:29

captain, it is down to the spread at the time of your trade.

[captainonthebridge] 01/3/2016 20:00

Judi, he/she is not worth my time but I will report it for the sake of those without thick skin.

BTW, thank you for your answer. I guess I am guilty of regurgitating the shyte (as you say) of others. I always thought that it was "mm games" because that is what I have read on these very forums. You live and learn.

[judijudi] 01/3/2016 19:45

In answer to your question its been posed countless times and I have never heard anybody explain why. Other than the standard "it's MM games" (which is imho Shyte)

[captainonthebridge] 01/3/2016 19:21

Asturias, your use of that foul language towards a complete stranger tells me all I need to know about you.

If anyone else would mind explaining, or at least point me in the right direction, why buys show as sells. It would be appreciated. Many thanks.

[judijudi] 01/3/2016 19:17

Lol :)
Thats funny :)

[bean02] 01/3/2016 18:26

Or maybe a rollover followed by bed n isa?

[bean02] 01/3/2016 18:24

Can anyone shed light on the 3 big trades? If 2 I would have assumed a rollover but the 3 has me flummoxed!?